


Why Does My mod_proxy_wstunnel and Go-websocket Setup Fail, and How Can I Fix It?
Mod_proxy_wstunnel and Go-websocket: A Problem and Its Resolution
In an attempt to employ Apache's mod_proxy_wstunnel with the go-websocket implementation, users may encounter obstacles. One user sought assistance in configuring the necessary settings.
A detailed description of the issue was provided: while the reverse proxy established successfully, the websocket connection failed to initiate. The user's configuration mirrored the following:
<VirtualHost *:80> DocumentRoot /var/www/foobar ServerName foobar.com ProxyPass / http://localhost:8080/ ProxyPassReverse / http://localhost:8080/ ProxyPass /ws/ ws://localhost:8080/ws/ ProxyPassReverse /ws/ ws://localhost:8080/ws/ ErrorLog logs/error_log-foobar CustomLog logs/access_log-foobar common LogLevel debug </VirtualHost>
Initially, the user received a "403 Forbidden" response, which suggested an origin check issue. After disabling the origin check, the error shifted to a "400 Bad Request," indicating that the server was not receiving the upgrade request.
After gathering recommendations from numerous sources, the user arrived at a solution:
- Trailing Slash: As Aralo pointed out, adding a trailing slash to the WebSocket path ("/ws/") was crucial. Apache appears to require a valid GET request for WebSocket handling.
- ProxyPass Order: James Henstridge correctly noted that the order of ProxyPass directives is important. The ProxyPass for "/ws/" should precede the general "/".
- Origin Check Removal: The go-websocket example code included an origin check in the ServeWs() function, which was removed.
Implementing these changes resolved the issue, and the user was able to successfully establish the websocket connection behind Apache's mod_proxy_wstunnel.
The above is the detailed content of Why Does My mod_proxy_wstunnel and Go-websocket Setup Fail, and How Can I Fix It?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

C is more suitable for scenarios where direct control of hardware resources and high performance optimization is required, while Golang is more suitable for scenarios where rapid development and high concurrency processing are required. 1.C's advantage lies in its close to hardware characteristics and high optimization capabilities, which are suitable for high-performance needs such as game development. 2.Golang's advantage lies in its concise syntax and natural concurrency support, which is suitable for high concurrency service development.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.
