When faced with parsing large XML documents, C# developers grapple with the choice between several approaches, each with its own memory efficiency implications.
XML Serialization vs XSD
XML Serialization and XSD-generated bindings provide a convenient and structured way to map XML to C# objects. However, these approaches rely on caching the entire XML document in memory, which can be problematic for large files.
XmlReader vs Hand-crafted Objects
XmlReader offers a forward-only stream-based approach, consuming less memory than DOM parsers. However, it requires a meticulous hand-crafted object graph to capture the XML's structure.
XLINQ: A Slick Alternative
XLINQ emerges as a compromise between the two. It provides a lightweight object-oriented API for manipulating XML, avoiding the overhead of DOM while allowing for efficient streaming.
Memory Considerations
Solution Recommendation
For large XML documents (e.g., your estimated 150 MB extract), XmlReader with a hand-crafted object graph is recommended. This approach offers the best memory efficiency while enabling a flexible and customizable parsing process.
Sample Code using XmlReader:
using (XmlReader myReader = XmlReader.Create(@"c:\data\coords.xml")) { while (myReader.Read()) { // Process each node (myReader.Value) here // ... } }
Reference:
The above is the detailed content of Large XML Parsing in C#: XSD, XLINQ, or XmlReader – Which Approach Wins for Memory Efficiency?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!