How Can We Achieve Type-Safe Discriminated Unions in C#?

Discriminated Union in C

Introduction:

Discriminated unions, also known as tagged unions or disjoint unions, are a programming construct that allows the storage of different types of data in a single variable. They provide a type-safe way to represent a set of values with a limited number of variants.

Understanding the Problem:

The question proposes a Union class in C# to provide similar functionality to the C-style union. However, the class lacks compiler-enforced type checking when using the Is and As functions. The issue arises when attempting to retrieve a value of a specific type without ensuring that the union actually contains that type.

Can We Achieve Type-Safe Union in C#?

Yes, we can implement type-safe discriminated unions in C# using generic constraints and pattern matching. Here's an example:

public abstract class Union<A, B, C>
{
    public abstract T Match<T>(Func<A, T> f, Func<B, T> g, Func<C, T> h);
}

public class Case1<A, B, C> : Union<A, B, C>
{
    public readonly A Item;
    public Case1(A item) { Item = item; }
    public override T Match<T>(Func<A, T> f, Func<B, T> g, Func<C, T> h) => f(Item);
}

public class Case2<A, B, C> : Union<A, B, C>
{
    public readonly B Item;
    public Case2(B item) { Item = item; }
    public override T Match<T>(Func<A, T> f, Func<B, T> g, Func<C, T> h) => g(Item);
}

public class Case3<A, B, C> : Union<A, B, C>
{
    public readonly C Item;
    public Case3(C item) { Item = item; }
    public override T Match<T>(Func<A, T> f, Func<B, T> g, Func<C, T> h) => h(Item);
}

Usage:

To use this Union type, create instances of specific cases:

var union1 = new Case1<int, string, bool>(5);
var union2 = new Case2<int, string, bool>('a');
var union3 = new Case3<int, string, bool>(true);

Pattern Matching:

To retrieve the value from the union, use pattern matching:

var value1 = union1.Match(n => n, _ => null, _ => null); // Returns 5 (int)
var value2 = union2.Match(_ => null, c => c.ToString(), _ => null); // Returns "a" (string)
var value3 = union3.Match(_ => null, _ => null, b => b.ToString()); // Returns "True" (string)

Conclusion:

This solution provides type-safe discriminated unions in C# by leveraging generics and pattern matching. It ensures that the code does not attempt to access incorrect values, enhancing the safety and correctness of the application.

The above is the detailed content of How Can We Achieve Type-Safe Discriminated Unions in C#?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!