Best Practices for Returning Errors in ASP.NET Web API
When dealing with errors in ASP.NET Web APIs, there are two primary approaches: returning errors immediately or accumulating errors and sending them back collectively. This article examines the pros and cons of each approach and provides the recommended best practice.
1. Returning Errors Immediately
In the first approach, errors are returned immediately using HttpResponseExceptions. This is suitable when:
Example:
public void Post(Customer customer) { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(customer.Name)) { throw new HttpResponseException("Customer Name cannot be empty", HttpStatusCode.BadRequest); } if (customer.Accounts.Count == 0) { throw new HttpResponseException("Customer does not have any account", HttpStatusCode.BadRequest); } }
2. Accumulating and Sending Back Errors
In the second approach, errors are accumulated and returned collectively at the end of the action. This is recommended when:
Example:
public void Post(Customer customer) { List<string> errors = new List<string>(); if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(customer.Name)) { errors.Add("Customer Name cannot be empty"); } if (customer.Accounts.Count == 0) { errors.Add("Customer does not have any account"); } var responseMessage = new HttpResponseMessage<List<string>>(errors, HttpStatusCode.BadRequest); throw new HttpResponseException(responseMessage); }
Best Practice
While both approaches have their merits, the recommended best practice is to return errors immediately. This:
However, for non-fatal errors that are part of a larger validation or processing stage, accumulating errors and returning them collectively may be more appropriate.
Updates
This article has been updated over time with insights from blog posts and changes in best practices:
The above is the detailed content of How Should ASP.NET Web APIs Return Errors: Immediately or Collectively?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!