Async Void and ASP.Net: Understanding the Exception
When using async void methods in ASP.Net applications, you may encounter an exception stating, "An asynchronous module or handler completed while an asynchronous operation was still pending." This exception arises because async void increments the count of outstanding operations upon invocation and decrements it upon completion.
In contrast, async Task methods return a Task object, allowing the ASP.Net framework to track the asynchronous operation and handle completion gracefully.
Why Task Helps
By returning Task, you enable the framework to:
Async Void and Fire-and-Forget
While async void methods may appear to implement a fire-and-forget approach, this is inaccurate in the context of ASP.Net. The framework actively tracks these methods, raising an exception if they complete prematurely.
To achieve a true fire-and-forget behavior, use async Task methods and ignore the returned Task. However, premature return from requests in ASP.Net is generally discouraged due to potential issues.
Additional Notes
The above is the detailed content of Why Does Using `async void` in ASP.NET Often Result in 'An asynchronous module or handler completed while an asynchronous operation was still pending'?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!