Why is My SQL Server Query Fast in SSMS but Slow in C# Code?
Query Performance Discrepancy in Code vs. SSMS
A query that performs smoothly in SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) may exhibit excessive slowness when executed within code. This discrepancy, encountered during a recent code development, prompted an investigation into the underlying cause.
Code Implementation
The C# code used to run the query is as follows:
using (var conn = new SqlConnection("Data Source=backend.example.com;...")) { using (var ada = new SqlDataAdapter(sqlCommand, conn)) { ada.SelectCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@clientID", ClientID); ada.SelectCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue("@dt", dtpFilter.Value); conn.Open(); Logs.Clear(); ada.Fill(Logs); // Time out exception for 30 sec limit. } }
SSMS Query
The identical query, extracted from the C# code, is run directly in SSMS:
SELECT [PK_JOB],[CLIENT_ID],[STATUS],[LOG_NAME],dt FROM [ES_HISTORY] inner join [es_history_dt] on [PK_JOB] = [es_historyid] Where client_id = @clientID and dt > @dt and (job_type > 4 or job_type = 0 or job_type = 1 or job_type = 4 ) Order by dt desc
Analysis
Upon examination, a subtle difference exists between the two queries. In the SSMS version, the @clientID parameter is declared as VARCHAR, while in the C# code, it is added using the AddWithValue method, which typically assigns the data type based on the .NET variable's type. In this case, the ClientID variable is of type string, which is mapped to NVARCHAR in SQL Server.
Impact
This difference has a significant impact on query performance. The NVARCHAR parameter type does not allow for Search Argument (SARG) filtering, a crucial optimization technique that SQL Server uses to quickly locate rows based on indexed columns. As a result, the query in the C# code is forced to perform a table scan, which is far less efficient than an index seek.
Solution
To resolve the discrepancy, it is necessary to explicitly specify the VARCHAR data type for the @clientID parameter in the C# code. This can be achieved using the following syntax:
ada.SelectCommand.Parameters.Add("@clientID", SqlDbType.VarChar, 200).Value = ClientID;
By ensuring that the data types of the parameters match those declared in the SSMS query, the application can avoid the performance penalty and execute the query in a time-efficient manner.
The above is the detailed content of Why is My SQL Server Query Fast in SSMS but Slow in C# Code?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics



The article discusses using MySQL's ALTER TABLE statement to modify tables, including adding/dropping columns, renaming tables/columns, and changing column data types.

InnoDB's full-text search capabilities are very powerful, which can significantly improve database query efficiency and ability to process large amounts of text data. 1) InnoDB implements full-text search through inverted indexing, supporting basic and advanced search queries. 2) Use MATCH and AGAINST keywords to search, support Boolean mode and phrase search. 3) Optimization methods include using word segmentation technology, periodic rebuilding of indexes and adjusting cache size to improve performance and accuracy.

Article discusses configuring SSL/TLS encryption for MySQL, including certificate generation and verification. Main issue is using self-signed certificates' security implications.[Character count: 159]

Article discusses popular MySQL GUI tools like MySQL Workbench and phpMyAdmin, comparing their features and suitability for beginners and advanced users.[159 characters]

Article discusses strategies for handling large datasets in MySQL, including partitioning, sharding, indexing, and query optimization.

The article discusses dropping tables in MySQL using the DROP TABLE statement, emphasizing precautions and risks. It highlights that the action is irreversible without backups, detailing recovery methods and potential production environment hazards.

The article discusses creating indexes on JSON columns in various databases like PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MongoDB to enhance query performance. It explains the syntax and benefits of indexing specific JSON paths, and lists supported database systems.

MySQL supports four index types: B-Tree, Hash, Full-text, and Spatial. 1.B-Tree index is suitable for equal value search, range query and sorting. 2. Hash index is suitable for equal value searches, but does not support range query and sorting. 3. Full-text index is used for full-text search and is suitable for processing large amounts of text data. 4. Spatial index is used for geospatial data query and is suitable for GIS applications.
