Async Invocation in Console Applications: Debunking the 'Up' and 'Down' Myth
In C#, when invoking asynchronous methods, it is commonly asserted that synchronization must be maintained "up" and "down" the call stack. However, this dogma does not hold true for console applications.
Consider this code snippet:
public static async Task<int> SumTwoOperationsAsync() { // Simulate time-consuming operations var firstTask = GetOperationOneAsync(); var secondTask = GetOperationTwoAsync(); // Sum the results of the operations return await firstTask + await secondTask; } private static async Task<int> GetOperationOneAsync() { await Task.Delay(500); // Simulating operation delay return 10; } private static async Task<int> GetOperationTwoAsync() { await Task.Delay(100); // Simulating operation delay return 5; }
According to the "up and down" rule, it seems logical to mark the Main function, where SumTwoOperationsAsync is invoked, as asynchronous. However, this assumption is incorrect. Console applications do not support asynchronous entry points. Attempting to do so will result in a compilation error stating, "an entry point cannot be marked with the 'async' modifier."
So, how do we invoke asynchronous code in console applications? There are two primary approaches:
static void Main() { MainAsync().Wait(); // Alternatively, to avoid wrapping exceptions in AggregateException: // MainAsync().GetAwaiter().GetResult(); } static async Task MainAsync() { // Async code goes here }
static void Main() { AsyncContext.Run(() => MainAsync()); } static async Task MainAsync() { // Async code goes here }
For more comprehensive insights into asynchronous console applications, visit the provided blog post. Remember, the "up and down" rule may not apply seamlessly in all scenarios.
The above is the detailed content of How Do I Properly Invoke Asynchronous Code in C# Console Applications?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!