In versions prior to C# 5.0, there was a fundamental problem with closure capture in loop structures. Variables declared within a loop will be captured by the closure and retain their final value, leading to convoluted results.
While this issue has been resolved in C# 5.0 for "foreach" loops, it still exists in "for" loops. The question is: why does this inconsistency persist?
The answer lies in the fundamental nature of "for" loops. A "foreach" loop inherently means creating a new variable for each iteration, while a "for" loop allows for more flexible control over variable initialization, condition checking, and iteration.
The logic of “for” loop:
<code>{ initializer; while (condition) { body; iterator; } }</code>
It can be seen that the initialization phase logically occurs only once, establishing a fixed initial value. Then modify the value of the variable in the loop body and operate through the iterator.
Effect on closure capture:
This logical structure means that it makes sense to capture only one instance of a variable in a closure. There is no inherent concept of a "starting" value or progressive update of a variable during loop execution.
Comparison with "foreach" loop:
In contrast, the "foreach" loop seems to declare a new variable for each iteration. This variable is read-only, emphasizing its unique nature in each iteration. This semantic difference justifies capturing a separate variable for each execution.
The decision to retain the legacy behavior of variable capture in "for" loops stems from the inherent flexibility and control provided by these loop constructs. The existing behavior closely matches the logical structure of the "for" loop, ensuring consistent and predictable results.
The above is the detailed content of Why Do C# 5.0 Foreach and For Loops Exhibit Different Captured Closure Behaviors?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!