Traditional C# "fire-and-forget" asynchronous operations, using delegates and asynchronous delegates, execute tasks without blocking the main thread. The introduction of async
/await
refines this approach.
Let's examine a comparison of the older and newer methods:
<code class="language-csharp">// Old approach Action<string> asyncAction = DoIt; asyncAction.BeginInvoke("Test", ar => { asyncAction.EndInvoke(ar); ar.AsyncWaitHandle.Close(); }, null); Console.WriteLine("Old-style main thread finished"); // New approach DoIt2("Test2"); Console.WriteLine("New-style main thread finished");</code>
Both achieve the same outcome, but async
/await
simplifies the process, eliminating the need for EndInvoke
and manual handle closure. However, await Task.Yield();
might be necessary in certain scenarios.
The performance difference between these methods is negligible. The key advantage of async
/await
lies in its improved resource management; it automatically handles cleanup, removing the risk of resource leaks associated with manual handle management.
To asynchronously execute a synchronous method, A()
, without altering its code, wrap it within an asynchronous method:
<code class="language-csharp">public static async Task<TResult> InvokeAsync<TResult>(Func<TResult> action) { return await Task.Run(action); }</code>
Call the wrapper:
<code class="language-csharp">var task = InvokeAsync(A);</code>
async void
It's best practice to avoid async void
methods due to their complexities in exception handling. The Task
-based approach above provides a more robust and manageable solution for handling potential errors.
The above is the detailed content of How Does the New Async/Await Syntax Impact Fire-and-Forget Operations in C#?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!