Problem:
Asynchronous Entity Framework database calls exhibit significantly slower performance than their synchronous counterparts, often experiencing a tenfold increase in execution time. Consider this example:
<code class="language-csharp">// Retrieve albums var albums = await this.context.Albums .Where(x => x.Artist.ID == artist.ID) .ToListAsync();</code>
Root Cause:
This performance issue stems from a flaw in EF 6's asynchronous implementation. When dealing with tables containing binary columns, EF incorrectly employs non-sequential data retrieval (CommandBehavior.Default) instead of the more efficient sequential access (CommandBehavior.SequentialAccess).
While future EF versions are expected to address this, a workaround involves manually wrapping the synchronous operation within an asynchronous method using TaskCompletionSource<T>
. This bypasses EF's inefficient asynchronous implementation.
The performance drop in asynchronous Entity Framework operations isn't inherent to asynchronous programming but a specific bug in EF 6's implementation. Employing a manual asynchronous wrapper effectively mitigates this performance bottleneck and improves application responsiveness.
The above is the detailed content of Why is My Entity Framework Async Operation 10x Slower Than Synchronous?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!