Custom AuthorizeAttribute Dependency Injection Challenges
Problem:
Direct dependency injection (using property injection) into custom AuthorizeAttribute
classes often fails, resulting in null dependency properties at runtime.
Why Dependency Injection in Attributes is Problematic:
Several factors make dependency injection into attributes difficult and generally undesirable:
-
Constructor Injection Infeasibility: Attributes cannot be readily intercepted during creation, preventing constructor injection.
-
Temporal Coupling: Property injection introduces problematic temporal coupling.
-
Container Validation Issues: It complicates container configuration validation.
-
Caching Conflicts: Framework attribute caching can lead to unintended dependency issues and bugs.
Effective Alternatives:
Approach 1: Decoupled Attributes (Passive Attributes)
-
Separate Concerns: Create a dedicated service to encapsulate the logic and manage dependencies.
-
Attribute Role: The attribute acts as a simple wrapper, resolving and invoking the service's methods.
Approach 2: Service Locator Pattern
-
Service Encapsulation: Move all attribute logic into a dedicated service that manages dependencies.
-
Service Registration: Register this service with the dependency injection container.
-
Service Resolution: Within the attribute, use a service locator to resolve and call the service's methods.
Best Practices:
-
Approach 1 (Decoupled Attributes): Recommended for cleaner designs, especially when managing multiple attributes or working across different assemblies.
-
Approach 2 (Service Locator): A pragmatic solution for simpler scenarios where strict attribute isolation is less critical.
By employing these strategies, developers can effectively manage dependencies without compromising the integrity and maintainability of their attribute-based code.
The above is the detailed content of How Can I Successfully Inject Dependencies into Custom AuthorizeAttributes?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!