Home > Backend Development > C++ > Why does asynchronous locking based on a key cause intermittent file access errors, and how can a reference-counting approach improve it?

Why does asynchronous locking based on a key cause intermittent file access errors, and how can a reference-counting approach improve it?

Susan Sarandon
Release: 2025-01-15 09:35:43
Original
238 people have browsed it

Why does asynchronous locking based on a key cause intermittent file access errors, and how can a reference-counting approach improve it?

Asynchronous Key-Based Locking: A Source of Intermittent File Access Errors

The ImageProcessor library's cache mechanism, employing asynchronous locking based on a key, suffers from intermittent file access errors. This stems from a design flaw within the AsyncDuplicateLock class.

The Flaw: Premature Semaphore Release

The original AsyncDuplicateLock code prematurely removes SemaphoreSlim instances from the ConcurrentDictionary before releasing the semaphore. This leads to excessive semaphore churn and potential errors because semaphores might be accessed after removal.

Solution: A Robust Reference-Counting Approach

A superior solution utilizes reference counting. Each semaphore in the dictionary maintains a reference count. A single lock guarantees atomicity for decrementing the count and removing the semaphore, eliminating the need for a ConcurrentDictionary.

<code class="language-csharp">public sealed class AsyncDuplicateLock
{
    private sealed class RefCounted<T>
    {
        public RefCounted(T value)
        {
            RefCount = 1;
            Value = value;
        }

        public int RefCount { get; set; }
        public T Value { get; private set; }
    }

    private static readonly Dictionary<object, RefCounted<SemaphoreSlim>> SemaphoreSlims = new Dictionary<object, RefCounted<SemaphoreSlim>>();

    private SemaphoreSlim GetOrCreate(object key)
    {
        RefCounted<SemaphoreSlim> item;
        lock (SemaphoreSlims)
        {
            if (SemaphoreSlims.TryGetValue(key, out item))
            {
                item.RefCount++;
            }
            else
            {
                item = new RefCounted<SemaphoreSlim>(new SemaphoreSlim(1, 1));
                SemaphoreSlims[key] = item;
            }
        }
        return item.Value;
    }

    public IDisposable Lock(object key)
    {
        GetOrCreate(key).Wait();
        return new Releaser { Key = key };
    }

    public async Task<IDisposable> LockAsync(object key)
    {
        await GetOrCreate(key).WaitAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
        return new Releaser { Key = key };
    }

    private sealed class Releaser : IDisposable
    {
        public object Key { get; set; }

        public void Dispose()
        {
            RefCounted<SemaphoreSlim> item;
            lock (SemaphoreSlims)
            {
                item = SemaphoreSlims[Key];
                item.RefCount--;
                if (item.RefCount == 0)
                    SemaphoreSlims.Remove(Key);
            }
            item.Value.Release();
        }
    }
}</code>
Copy after login

This revised approach guarantees semaphores are released only when no longer needed, effectively preventing the intermittent file access errors during cache operations.

The above is the detailed content of Why does asynchronous locking based on a key cause intermittent file access errors, and how can a reference-counting approach improve it?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Latest Articles by Author
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template