Type conversion methods in LINQ: Comparison of Cast() and OfType()
When using LINQ for type conversion, there are two main methods used: Cast()
and OfType()
. Understanding the nuances of these two approaches is critical for efficient data manipulation.
Cast() method
TheCast()
method attempts to convert each element in IEnumerable
to the specified target type. It does not perform any filtering operations; it simply attempts to convert all elements. If some elements cannot be successfully converted, this may result in a InvalidCastException
exception.
OfType() method
TheOfType()
method filters elements based on their type before converting them. It returns a IEnumerable
containing only those elements that can be safely converted to the target type.
Usage scenarios
When to use each method depends on the desired behavior:
When to use Cast():
When to use OfType():
Example description
Consider the following example:
<code class="language-csharp">object[] objs = new object[] { "12345", 12 }; IEnumerable<string> castCollection = objs.Cast<string>().ToArray(); // 抛出 InvalidCastException 异常 IEnumerable<string> ofTypeCollection = objs.OfType<string>().ToArray(); // 返回 { "12345" }</code>
In this example, Cast()
will try to convert all elements, causing a InvalidCastException
exception. However, OfType()
filters out the integer elements and only returns "12345".
Summary
By understanding the difference between Cast()
and OfType()
, developers can perform more targeted and efficient type conversion operations in LINQ queries, resulting in clearer, more robust code.
The above is the detailed content of LINQ Casting: When to Use Cast() vs. OfType()?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!