Go Framework Comparison for Web Development
This article compares seven popular Go web frameworks: Gin, Echo, Gorilla Mux, Beego, Revel, Fiber, and go-zero/rest. Each is evaluated based on key features and suitability for various development needs. All examples below demonstrate a simple "Hello, World!" server.
1. Gin
- Key Features: Fast, efficient, rich feature set (routing, middleware, parameter binding, JSON/XML rendering).
- Example Code:
package main import "github.com/gin-gonic/gin" func main() { router := gin.Default() router.GET("/hello", func(c *gin.Context) { c.JSON(200, gin.H{ "message": "Hello, world!", }) }) router.Run(":8080") }
2. Echo
- Key Features: Lightweight, high-performance, concise API.
- Example Code:
package main import ( "net/http" "github.com/labstack/echo/v4" ) func main() { e := echo.New() e.GET("/hello", func(c echo.Context) error { return c.String(http.StatusOK, "Hello, World!") }) e.Start(":8080") }
3. Gorilla Mux
- Key Features: Powerful routing capabilities, various components and tools.
- Example Code:
package main import ( "fmt" "net/http" "github.com/gorilla/mux" ) func main() { r := mux.NewRouter() r.HandleFunc("/hello", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { fmt.Fprintln(w, "Hello, world!") }) http.ListenAndServe(":8080", r) }
4. Beego
- Key Features: Full-featured MVC framework, built-in functions (routing, middleware, ORM).
- Example Code:
package main import ( "github.com/astaxie/beego" ) type MainController struct { beego.Controller } func (c *MainController) Get() { c.Ctx.WriteString("Hello, world!") } func main() { beego.Router("/hello", &MainController{}) beego.Run(":8080") }
5. Revel
- Key Features: High-productivity full-stack framework, includes routing, controllers, and template engines.
- Example Code:
package main import "github.com/revel/revel" func Hello() revel.Result { return revel.Text("Hello, world!") } func main() { revel.Get("/hello", Hello) revel.Run(":8080") }
6. Fiber
- Key Features: Similar to Express.js, high-performance, flexible, concise API.
- Example Code:
package main import "github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2" func main() { app := fiber.New() app.Get("/hello", func(c *fiber.Ctx) error { return c.SendString("Hello, world!") }) app.Listen(":8080") }
7. go-zero/rest
- Key Features: Simple, easy-to-use RESTful API framework, suitable for high-concurrency.
- Example Code:
package main import ( "net/http" "github.com/zeromicro/go-zero/rest" ) func main() { engine := rest.NewEngine() defer engine.Stop() engine.AddRoute(rest.Route{ Method: http.MethodGet, Path: "/hello", Handler: helloHandler, }) engine.Start() } func helloHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { w.Write([]byte("Hello, world!")) }
Framework Comparison Table:
A detailed comparison table outlining the features of each framework is provided below. (Note: The original table is reproduced here. Paraphrasing it would significantly alter the content.)
Features | Gin | Echo | Gorilla Mux | Beego | Revel | Fiber | go - zero/rest |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type | Web framework | Web framework | Web framework | MVC framework | Full-stack framework | Web framework | Web framework |
Routing function | ✔️ Simple and easy to use | ✔️ Simple and easy to use | ✔️ Powerful routing function | ✔️ Built-in routing function | ✔️ Built-in routing function | ✔️ Simple and flexible | ✔️ Simple and easy to use |
Middleware support | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ❌ Requires an additional middleware library | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported |
Template engine | ❌ Not provided | ❌ Not provided, but can integrate third-party template engines | ❌ Not provided | ✔️ Built-in template engine | ✔️ Built-in template engine | ❌ Not provided | ❌ Not provided |
ORM | ❌ Not provided | ❌ Not provided | ❌ Not provided | ✔️ Built-in ORM | ✔️ Built-in ORM | ❌ Not provided | ✔️ Supported |
WebSocket support | ❌ Not provided | ❌ Not provided | ❌ Not provided | ❌ Not provided | ✔️ Supported | ❌ Not provided | ❌ Not provided |
Use in production environment | ✔️ Suitable for production environment | ✔️ Suitable for production environment | ✔️ Suitable for production environment | ✔️ Suitable for production environment | ✔️ Suitable for production environment | ✔️ Suitable for production environment | ✔️ Suitable for production environment |
Performance | High | High | High | High | High | High | High |
Community support | ✔️ Active community support | ✔️ Active community support | ✔️ Active community support | ✔️ Active community support | ✔️ Active community support | ✔️ Active community support | ✔️ Active community support |
Learning curve | Low | Low | Medium | Medium | High | Low | Low |
Documentation quality | High | High | Medium | Medium | High | High | High |
GitHub stars | 42.7k | 20.3k | 17.2k | 12.5k | 12.2k | 12.4k | 7.5k |
Routing parameter parsing | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported |
Static file service | ✔️ Supported | ❌ Requires an additional middleware library | ❌ Requires an additional middleware library | ✔️ Supported | ❌ Requires an additional middleware library | ❌ Requires an additional middleware library | ❌ Requires an additional middleware library |
Custom middleware | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ❌ Requires an additional middleware library | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported |
Testing support | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ❌ Not provided |
Internationalization support | ✔️ Supported | ❌ Not provided | ❌ Not provided | ✔️ Supported | ❌ Not provided | ❌ Not provided | ❌ Not provided |
Security | High | High | High | Medium | High | High | High |
Cross-platform support | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported |
Expandability | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported | ✔️ Supported |
Version stability | High | High | High | Medium | High | High | High |
Leapcell: A Recommendation for Go Web Hosting
Leapcell is presented as a serverless platform well-suited for deploying Go services. Its key advantages include multi-language support, free deployment of unlimited projects (pay-as-you-go), cost efficiency, streamlined developer experience, and effortless scalability and high performance.
For more information, refer to the Leapcell documentation and Twitter account: https://www.php.cn/link/7884effb9452a6d7a7a79499ef854afd
The above is the detailed content of Go Framework Comparison for Web Development. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics





OpenSSL, as an open source library widely used in secure communications, provides encryption algorithms, keys and certificate management functions. However, there are some known security vulnerabilities in its historical version, some of which are extremely harmful. This article will focus on common vulnerabilities and response measures for OpenSSL in Debian systems. DebianOpenSSL known vulnerabilities: OpenSSL has experienced several serious vulnerabilities, such as: Heart Bleeding Vulnerability (CVE-2014-0160): This vulnerability affects OpenSSL 1.0.1 to 1.0.1f and 1.0.2 to 1.0.2 beta versions. An attacker can use this vulnerability to unauthorized read sensitive information on the server, including encryption keys, etc.

The library used for floating-point number operation in Go language introduces how to ensure the accuracy is...

Queue threading problem in Go crawler Colly explores the problem of using the Colly crawler library in Go language, developers often encounter problems with threads and request queues. �...

Backend learning path: The exploration journey from front-end to back-end As a back-end beginner who transforms from front-end development, you already have the foundation of nodejs,...

This article introduces a variety of methods and tools to monitor PostgreSQL databases under the Debian system, helping you to fully grasp database performance monitoring. 1. Use PostgreSQL to build-in monitoring view PostgreSQL itself provides multiple views for monitoring database activities: pg_stat_activity: displays database activities in real time, including connections, queries, transactions and other information. pg_stat_replication: Monitors replication status, especially suitable for stream replication clusters. pg_stat_database: Provides database statistics, such as database size, transaction commit/rollback times and other key indicators. 2. Use log analysis tool pgBadg

The problem of using RedisStream to implement message queues in Go language is using Go language and Redis...

The difference between string printing in Go language: The difference in the effect of using Println and string() functions is in Go...

Under the BeegoORM framework, how to specify the database associated with the model? Many Beego projects require multiple databases to be operated simultaneously. When using Beego...
