Home > Backend Development > Golang > Go Framework Comparison for Web Development

Go Framework Comparison for Web Development

Linda Hamilton
Release: 2025-01-20 00:08:10
Original
477 people have browsed it

Go Framework Comparison for Web Development

This article compares seven popular Go web frameworks: Gin, Echo, Gorilla Mux, Beego, Revel, Fiber, and go-zero/rest. Each is evaluated based on key features and suitability for various development needs. All examples below demonstrate a simple "Hello, World!" server.

1. Gin

  • Key Features: Fast, efficient, rich feature set (routing, middleware, parameter binding, JSON/XML rendering).
  • Example Code:
<code class="language-go">package main

import "github.com/gin-gonic/gin"

func main() {
    router := gin.Default()

    router.GET("/hello", func(c *gin.Context) {
        c.JSON(200, gin.H{
            "message": "Hello, world!",
        })
    })

    router.Run(":8080")
}</code>
Copy after login

2. Echo

  • Key Features: Lightweight, high-performance, concise API.
  • Example Code:
<code class="language-go">package main

import (
    "net/http"

    "github.com/labstack/echo/v4"
)

func main() {
    e := echo.New()

    e.GET("/hello", func(c echo.Context) error {
        return c.String(http.StatusOK, "Hello, World!")
    })

    e.Start(":8080")
}</code>
Copy after login

3. Gorilla Mux

  • Key Features: Powerful routing capabilities, various components and tools.
  • Example Code:
<code class="language-go">package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "net/http"

    "github.com/gorilla/mux"
)

func main() {
    r := mux.NewRouter()

    r.HandleFunc("/hello", func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
        fmt.Fprintln(w, "Hello, world!")
    })

    http.ListenAndServe(":8080", r)
}</code>
Copy after login

4. Beego

  • Key Features: Full-featured MVC framework, built-in functions (routing, middleware, ORM).
  • Example Code:
<code class="language-go">package main

import (
    "github.com/astaxie/beego"
)

type MainController struct {
    beego.Controller
}

func (c *MainController) Get() {
    c.Ctx.WriteString("Hello, world!")
}

func main() {
    beego.Router("/hello", &MainController{})
    beego.Run(":8080")
}</code>
Copy after login

5. Revel

  • Key Features: High-productivity full-stack framework, includes routing, controllers, and template engines.
  • Example Code:
<code class="language-go">package main

import "github.com/revel/revel"

func Hello() revel.Result {
    return revel.Text("Hello, world!")
}

func main() {
    revel.Get("/hello", Hello)
    revel.Run(":8080")
}</code>
Copy after login

6. Fiber

  • Key Features: Similar to Express.js, high-performance, flexible, concise API.
  • Example Code:
<code class="language-go">package main

import "github.com/gofiber/fiber/v2"

func main() {
    app := fiber.New()

    app.Get("/hello", func(c *fiber.Ctx) error {
        return c.SendString("Hello, world!")
    })

    app.Listen(":8080")
}</code>
Copy after login

7. go-zero/rest

  • Key Features: Simple, easy-to-use RESTful API framework, suitable for high-concurrency.
  • Example Code:
<code class="language-go">package main

import (
    "net/http"

    "github.com/zeromicro/go-zero/rest"
)

func main() {
    engine := rest.NewEngine()
    defer engine.Stop()

    engine.AddRoute(rest.Route{
        Method:  http.MethodGet,
        Path:    "/hello",
        Handler: helloHandler,
    })

    engine.Start()
}

func helloHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
    w.Write([]byte("Hello, world!"))
}</code>
Copy after login

Framework Comparison Table:

A detailed comparison table outlining the features of each framework is provided below. (Note: The original table is reproduced here. Paraphrasing it would significantly alter the content.)

Features Gin Echo Gorilla Mux Beego Revel Fiber go - zero/rest
Type Web framework Web framework Web framework MVC framework Full-stack framework Web framework Web framework
Routing function ✔️ Simple and easy to use ✔️ Simple and easy to use ✔️ Powerful routing function ✔️ Built-in routing function ✔️ Built-in routing function ✔️ Simple and flexible ✔️ Simple and easy to use
Middleware support ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ❌ Requires an additional middleware library ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported
Template engine ❌ Not provided ❌ Not provided, but can integrate third-party template engines ❌ Not provided ✔️ Built-in template engine ✔️ Built-in template engine ❌ Not provided ❌ Not provided
ORM ❌ Not provided ❌ Not provided ❌ Not provided ✔️ Built-in ORM ✔️ Built-in ORM ❌ Not provided ✔️ Supported
WebSocket support ❌ Not provided ❌ Not provided ❌ Not provided ❌ Not provided ✔️ Supported ❌ Not provided ❌ Not provided
Use in production environment ✔️ Suitable for production environment ✔️ Suitable for production environment ✔️ Suitable for production environment ✔️ Suitable for production environment ✔️ Suitable for production environment ✔️ Suitable for production environment ✔️ Suitable for production environment
Performance High High High High High High High
Community support ✔️ Active community support ✔️ Active community support ✔️ Active community support ✔️ Active community support ✔️ Active community support ✔️ Active community support ✔️ Active community support
Learning curve Low Low Medium Medium High Low Low
Documentation quality High High Medium Medium High High High
GitHub stars 42.7k 20.3k 17.2k 12.5k 12.2k 12.4k 7.5k
Routing parameter parsing ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported
Static file service ✔️ Supported ❌ Requires an additional middleware library ❌ Requires an additional middleware library ✔️ Supported ❌ Requires an additional middleware library ❌ Requires an additional middleware library ❌ Requires an additional middleware library
Custom middleware ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ❌ Requires an additional middleware library ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported
Testing support ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ❌ Not provided
Internationalization support ✔️ Supported ❌ Not provided ❌ Not provided ✔️ Supported ❌ Not provided ❌ Not provided ❌ Not provided
Security High High High Medium High High High
Cross-platform support ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported
Expandability ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported ✔️ Supported
Version stability High High High Medium High High High

Leapcell: A Recommendation for Go Web Hosting

Go Framework Comparison for Web Development

Leapcell is presented as a serverless platform well-suited for deploying Go services. Its key advantages include multi-language support, free deployment of unlimited projects (pay-as-you-go), cost efficiency, streamlined developer experience, and effortless scalability and high performance.

Go Framework Comparison for Web Development

For more information, refer to the Leapcell documentation and Twitter account: https://www.php.cn/link/7884effb9452a6d7a7a79499ef854afd

The above is the detailed content of Go Framework Comparison for Web Development. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Latest Articles by Author
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template