Customize Go Builds on AWS SAM with Dockerfiles and Makefiles
This post continues the series Building APPS with AWS SAM and Go, building upon the first installment. The previous chapter highlighted AWS's limited guidance on structuring scalable Go projects without redundant code.
This article demonstrates techniques for managing build processes using Dockerfiles and Makefiles.
The accompanying code is available here: https://www.php.cn/link/5655cf23be4dda7082c8bb3a8d8f8016. Explore the different Git branches for various use cases.
Let's begin!
The Challenge
After developing a new project structure, I chose Nix for dependency management (languages, tools, libraries). Nix operates by creating a temporary shell with the specified dependencies.
I encountered an error when executing binaries built within a Nix shell:
<code>libc.so.6 not found in /nix/23fj39chsggb09s.libc</code>
This halted Lambda execution. Debugging revealed the root cause: Go sometimes dynamically links C libraries to executables, specifying system paths. The libraries linked to Nix-built executables were:
<code>$ ldd bootstrap linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffff7fc4000) libresolv.so.2 => /nix/store/65h17wjrrlsj2rj540igylrx7fqcd6vq-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x00007ffff7fac000) libpthread.so.0 => /nix/store/65h17wjrrlsj2rj540igylrx7fqcd6vq-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007ffff7fa7000) libc.so.6 => /nix/store/65h17wjrrlsj2rj540igylrx7fqcd6vq-glibc-2.40-36/lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007ffff7c00000) /nix/store/65h17wjrrlsj2rj540igylrx7fqcd6vq-glibc-2.40-36/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 => /nix/store/65h17wjrrlsj2rj540igylrx7fqcd6vq-glibc-2.40-36/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007ffff7fc6000)</code>
Nix's non-standard dependency storage, combined with Lambda's isolated Docker containers, prevented the Lambda from locating these libraries, as they only existed in my local Nix installation. A solution was needed to instruct AWS SAM on how to compile the code and manage library linking.
Deploying Go Projects to AWS
Two deployment methods exist:
Zip Files ?
Compile locally and send the executable to AWS in a .zip file. AWS copies the executable to the Docker container. This offers the fastest cold starts.
Docker Images ?
Provide AWS with instructions to compile within the execution Docker container. This ensures compatibility but results in slower cold starts.
Solutions
I opted for Dockerfiles to continue using Nix, but both methods are presented below.
Zip Files ?
For Zip files, use this project structure (note the Makefile):
<code>. ├── cmd/ │ ├── function1/ │ │ └── function1.go # contains main() │ └── function2/ │ └── function2.go # contains main() ├── internal/ │ └── SHAREDFUNC.go ├── Makefile ├── go.mod ├── go.sum ├── samconfig.toml └── template.yaml</code>
The Makefile defines build commands for each function using the build-<function_name>
pattern (required by AWS SAM):
<code>.PHONY: build build: sam build build-HelloWorldFunction: GOARCH=amd64 GOOS=linux go build -tags lambda.norpc -o bootstrap ./cmd/function1/main.go cp ./bootstrap $(ARTIFACTS_DIR) build-ByeWorldFunction: GOARCH=amd64 GOOS=linux go build -tags lambda.norpc -o bootstrap ./cmd/function2/main.go cp ./bootstrap $(ARTIFACTS_DIR)</code>
Inform SAM of this process:
<code> HelloWorldFunction: Type: AWS::Serverless::Function Metadata: BuildMethod: makefile Properties: CodeUri: ./ Handler: bootstrap Runtime: provided.al2023 Architectures: - x86_64 Events: CatchAll: Type: Api Properties: Path: /hello Method: GET</code>
BuildMethod: makefile
tells SAM to use the Makefile, located where CodeUri
specifies.
Docker Images ?
Create a Dockerfile
and .dockerignore
in the root directory:
<code>. ├── cmd/ │ ├── function1/ │ │ └── function1.go # contains main() │ └── function2/ │ └── function2.go # contains main() ├── internal/ │ └── SHAREDFUNC.go ├── Dockerfile ├── .dockerignore ├── go.mod ├── go.sum ├── samconfig.toml └── template.yaml</code>
The Dockerfile
specifies build steps. ARG ENTRY_POINT
specifies the lambda entry point at build time:
<code>FROM public.ecr.aws/docker/library/golang:1.19 as build-image ARG ENTRY_POINT # !IMPORTANT WORKDIR /src COPY go.mod go.sum ./ RUN go mod download COPY . . RUN go build -tags lambda.norpc -o lambda-handler ${ENTRY_POINT} FROM public.ecr.aws/lambda/provided:al2023 COPY --from=build-image /src/lambda-handler . ENTRYPOINT ./lambda-handler</code>
Modify template.yaml
:
<code>libc.so.6 not found in /nix/23fj39chsggb09s.libc</code>
Note Metadata
and PackageType: Image
. DockerBuildArgs
passes ENTRY_POINT
from the Dockerfile
, allowing a single Dockerfile
for all lambdas.
Conclusion
This detailed explanation provides a comprehensive approach to managing Go builds within AWS SAM using both Zip files and Docker images. The choice depends on the priorities of build speed versus deployment consistency.
The above is the detailed content of Customize Go Builds on AWS SAM with Dockerfiles and Makefiles. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics











Go language performs well in building efficient and scalable systems. Its advantages include: 1. High performance: compiled into machine code, fast running speed; 2. Concurrent programming: simplify multitasking through goroutines and channels; 3. Simplicity: concise syntax, reducing learning and maintenance costs; 4. Cross-platform: supports cross-platform compilation, easy deployment.

Golang is better than Python in terms of performance and scalability. 1) Golang's compilation-type characteristics and efficient concurrency model make it perform well in high concurrency scenarios. 2) Python, as an interpreted language, executes slowly, but can optimize performance through tools such as Cython.

Golang is better than C in concurrency, while C is better than Golang in raw speed. 1) Golang achieves efficient concurrency through goroutine and channel, which is suitable for handling a large number of concurrent tasks. 2)C Through compiler optimization and standard library, it provides high performance close to hardware, suitable for applications that require extreme optimization.

Goimpactsdevelopmentpositivelythroughspeed,efficiency,andsimplicity.1)Speed:Gocompilesquicklyandrunsefficiently,idealforlargeprojects.2)Efficiency:Itscomprehensivestandardlibraryreducesexternaldependencies,enhancingdevelopmentefficiency.3)Simplicity:

Golang and Python each have their own advantages: Golang is suitable for high performance and concurrent programming, while Python is suitable for data science and web development. Golang is known for its concurrency model and efficient performance, while Python is known for its concise syntax and rich library ecosystem.

The performance differences between Golang and C are mainly reflected in memory management, compilation optimization and runtime efficiency. 1) Golang's garbage collection mechanism is convenient but may affect performance, 2) C's manual memory management and compiler optimization are more efficient in recursive computing.

Golang and C each have their own advantages in performance competitions: 1) Golang is suitable for high concurrency and rapid development, and 2) C provides higher performance and fine-grained control. The selection should be based on project requirements and team technology stack.

Golang is suitable for rapid development and concurrent scenarios, and C is suitable for scenarios where extreme performance and low-level control are required. 1) Golang improves performance through garbage collection and concurrency mechanisms, and is suitable for high-concurrency Web service development. 2) C achieves the ultimate performance through manual memory management and compiler optimization, and is suitable for embedded system development.
