Detailed explanation of covariance, contravariance and "in/out" in .NET generics
Covariance and contravariance play a crucial role in the design of .NET generic interfaces and delegates. They determine how to safely replace generic types in different scenarios.
Covariance and contravariance
Covariance allows a more "derived" (more specific) type to be used in place of a primitive type, provided that the primitive type is only a "return value" (e.g., as a return value). In contrast, contravariance allows a more "base" (less specific) type to be used in place of the original type, provided that the original type is only used as "input" (for example, as a method parameter).
“in” and “out”
The "in" and "out" keywords are abbreviations for covariance and contravariance respectively. When a generic type appears only as a return value, use "out"; when a generic type only appears as a method parameter, use "in".
Relationship Clarification
The example in the article about the inability to treat List
In-depth explanation of using generic interfaces
For a deeper understanding of covariance and contravariance, consider the following two generic methods:
<code>public Base DoSomething(int variable) public Derived DoSomethingElse(int variable)</code>
Assume an interface MyInterface
interface MyInterface<out T>
indicates that T can only be used as a return type. Assigning MyInterfaceinterface MyInterface<in T>
indicates that T can only be used as a method parameter. Assigning MyInterfaceSummary
Understanding the concepts of covariance, contravariance, and "in/out" is crucial to effectively using generics in .NET. It allows you to create type-safe code by ensuring that generic types are replaced correctly based on their usage.
The above is the detailed content of What are Covariance, Contravariance, and the 'in'/'out' Keywords in .NET Generics?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!