Home > Backend Development > C++ > What are Covariance, Contravariance, and the 'in'/'out' Keywords in .NET Generics?

What are Covariance, Contravariance, and the 'in'/'out' Keywords in .NET Generics?

Mary-Kate Olsen
Release: 2025-01-20 17:27:09
Original
497 people have browsed it

What are Covariance, Contravariance, and the

Detailed explanation of covariance, contravariance and "in/out" in .NET generics

Covariance and contravariance play a crucial role in the design of .NET generic interfaces and delegates. They determine how to safely replace generic types in different scenarios.

Covariance and contravariance

Covariance allows a more "derived" (more specific) type to be used in place of a primitive type, provided that the primitive type is only a "return value" (e.g., as a return value). In contrast, contravariance allows a more "base" (less specific) type to be used in place of the original type, provided that the original type is only used as "input" (for example, as a method parameter).

“in” and “out”

The "in" and "out" keywords are abbreviations for covariance and contravariance respectively. When a generic type appears only as a return value, use "out"; when a generic type only appears as a method parameter, use "in".

Relationship Clarification

The example in the article about the inability to treat List as List illustrates the concept of contravariance. Writing to a more specific (derived) type means using an "in" constraint (contravariance) because the type of data being written should be more specific.

In-depth explanation of using generic interfaces

For a deeper understanding of covariance and contravariance, consider the following two generic methods:

<code>public Base DoSomething(int variable)
public Derived DoSomethingElse(int variable)</code>
Copy after login

Assume an interface MyInterface, which has a method MyFunction(int variable), which returns a T.

  • Use "out" to modify T: interface MyInterface<out T> indicates that T can only be used as a return type. Assigning MyInterface to MyInterface is valid because Derived is a derived type from Base.
  • Use "in" to modify T: interface MyInterface<in T> indicates that T can only be used as a method parameter. Assigning MyInterface to MyInterface is invalid because it violates the contravariance rule.

Summary

Understanding the concepts of covariance, contravariance, and "in/out" is crucial to effectively using generics in .NET. It allows you to create type-safe code by ensuring that generic types are replaced correctly based on their usage.

The above is the detailed content of What are Covariance, Contravariance, and the 'in'/'out' Keywords in .NET Generics?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Latest Articles by Author
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template