SQL's LIKE
and IN
Operators: Can They Be Combined?
SQL's LIKE
operator is invaluable for pattern matching in text searches, but when dealing with a predefined set of patterns, the IN
operator offers improved readability and flexibility. However, a direct combination of LIKE
and IN
isn't directly supported in standard SQL.
Why No Direct Combination?
The absence of a direct LIKE
and IN
combination stems from the availability of a superior alternative: Full-Text Search (FTS).
Full-Text Search (FTS): A Better Approach
Both Oracle and SQL Server provide robust FTS capabilities, utilizing keywords like CONTAINS
to efficiently search for multiple patterns within a single query. This effectively replaces the need for combining LIKE
and IN
.
Examples using FTS:
Oracle:
<code class="language-sql">WHERE CONTAINS(t.something, 'bla OR foo OR batz', 1) > 0</code>
SQL Server:
<code class="language-sql">WHERE CONTAINS(t.something, '"bla*" OR "foo*" OR "batz*"')</code>
Important Considerations for FTS:
t.something
in the examples) for FTS to function correctly.LIKE
conditions in terms of speed and efficiency.Therefore, while a direct LIKE
and IN
combination isn't available, FTS provides a more powerful and efficient solution for searching multiple patterns.
The above is the detailed content of Can I Combine SQL's `LIKE` and `IN` Operators Without Subqueries?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!