PostgreSQL UPSERT Operations and the RETURNING Clause: Handling Conflicts
PostgreSQL's INSERT ... ON CONFLICT
provides upsert functionality, combining insertion and updates. However, using DO NOTHING
with the RETURNING
clause can lead to incomplete results in concurrent scenarios.
Concurrency Problem 1: Missing Returned Rows
If another transaction modifies the target row before your INSERT ... ON CONFLICT
completes, the upsert might not detect the conflict, resulting in missing rows in the RETURNING
output.
Solutions:
Several approaches mitigate this:
RETURNING
count. Discrepancies indicate missing rows, prompting a re-execution of the statement.Concurrency Problem 2: Row Locking
For transactions requiring row locks, use ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE
with WHERE FALSE
. This locks rows without altering them. Combine this with SELECT ... FOR UPDATE
for additional locking.
Data Type Handling and Casting for Robustness
Existing solutions are insufficient for all concurrent scenarios. A more comprehensive approach involves:
Low Concurrency:
INSERT
and SELECT UNION
to differentiate between inserted and selected rows.High Concurrency:
INSERT ... ON CONFLICT
CTE to manage concurrency.Deadlock Avoidance:
Consistent insertion order minimizes deadlock occurrences.
Data Type Management:
The above is the detailed content of How to Guarantee Consistent Results from PostgreSQL UPSERT Operations with RETURNING?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!