foreach
Variables and multi-threaded closures in C#: Are they safe?
When using foreach
to loop over a collection in C#, it is crucial to understand the scope and behavior of iteration variables, especially in a multi-threaded environment.
The following code snippet explores whether it is safe to use foreach
variables directly as closure arguments in multi-threading, and whether a local copy needs to be created for each iteration.
Pre-C# 5 versions
In versions prior to C# 5, foreach
variables were declared outside the loop. This means that a single variable instance is shared across all iterations.
Consider the first code snippet:
<code class="language-csharp">foreach (Foo f in ListOfFoo) { Thread thread = new Thread(() => f.DoSomething()); threads.Add(thread); thread.Start(); }</code>
In this example, the f
variable is shared among all threads created during the loop iteration. This can lead to unpredictable results, as multiple threads may end up calling methods on different instances of Foo
, or calling methods on the same instance multiple times.
To avoid such problems, it is recommended to create a local copy of the f
variable in each iteration, as shown in the second code snippet:
<code class="language-csharp">foreach (Foo f in ListOfFoo) { Foo f2 = f; Thread thread = new Thread(() => f2.DoSomething()); threads.Add(thread); thread.Start(); }</code>
C# 5 and above
C# 5 introduces significant changes. In C# 5 and above, foreach
variables are defined within a loop scope. This means each iteration has its own instance of the variable.
Thus, the two code snippets become equivalent and safe. Each thread now has its own f
instance within its closure scope, eliminating the risk of confusion or inconsistency.
The above is the detailed content of Is Using the `foreach` Variable Directly in C# Multi-threaded Closures Safe?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!