Comparison of Await and Result in C# asynchronous programming
In C# asynchronous programming, the await
keyword is used to suspend execution until the task is completed. However, some developers will question, if the task has been completed, why is await
needed? Isn’t it possible to directly access the Task.Result
attribute? This article will explore this issue and explain why await
should be used in preference.
Stephen Cleary recommends the following code snippet in his book "Concurrency in C# Cookbook":
<code class="language-C#">var completedTask = await Task.WhenAny(downloadTask, timeoutTask); if (completedTask == timeoutTask) return null; return await downloadTask; </code>
Here, downloadTask
represents an HTTP GET request, and timeoutTask
serves as a timeout monitor. If the HTTP request does not complete within the given time, timeoutTask
completes.
Assume the HTTP request completes before timing out. In this case, downloadTask
is done. So why does the code snippet use a second await
? Why not just use downloadTask.Result
?
The answer lies in the nuances of exception handling and potential deadlocks. await
handles exceptions differently than Result
or Wait
. await
Avoid wrapping exceptions in AggregateException
, which is generally undesirable in asynchronous code. Additionally, Result
and Wait
can cause deadlocks, especially in asynchronous methods.
Therefore, it is recommended to give priority to await
unless it is clear that the task has been completed. In general, the use of Result
and Wait
should be avoided in asynchronous application code. They can occasionally be used in asynchronous utility libraries or parallel task code.
By following these guidelines, developers can improve the security and maintainability of asynchronous code bases, and improve code readability.
The above is the detailed content of Await vs. Result in C#: When Should You Use Await Instead of Accessing Task.Result?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!