Zero-Allocation in Go (Golang)

GO language garbage recycling and zero -distribution programming

GO language

Garbage Recycle (GC) is a key feature. It simplifies memory management, prevent memory leakage, and eliminates the need to manually release memory. However, GC also has its own price. In high -performance applications, delay and jittering will be introduced even if the short GC suspension, which may become a bottleneck. For real -time systems, it is usually necessary to give priority to performance rather than GC's simplicity.

In order to solve this problem, developers can use

zero -distribution programming —— a technology that minimizes or completely avoid stacking distribution, thereby reducing GC overhead. This method includes optimizing memory use by efficient distribution strategies to achieve faster and more predictable Go applications.

In this article, we will explore a practical method of reducing the distribution, optimizing memory efficiency, and writing high -performance GO code.

Why to minimize the distribution?

Although the GO garbage recovery device aims to improve efficiency, excessive pile allocation will bring performance challenges:

Increasing delay:
1. Each garbage recycling cycle will increase the processing time, which may be a problem for applications that require consistent response time. higher CPU usage rate:
GC will consume valuable CPU cycles, and these cycles can have been used for key calculations.
2. Unpredictable suspension: Although the GC GC has improved, occasionally suspension will occur, which makes it difficult to predict performance.
3. By using zero distribution technology , developers can significantly reduce the load of garbage recychers, thereby achieving smoother and more reliable application performance.

The challenge of zero -assigning programming

Although zero -distribution programming can improve performance, it also brings some weighing and risks:

Readability and performance:

Optimizing for zero distribution may make the code more complicated and difficult to read. Balance between performance improvement and maintenance can be obtained.

The risk of manual memory management:

GO developers usually depend on garbage recychers, so manual management of memory (for example, using object pools or pre -distribution buffer) may introduce logic errors, such as data Access data after release.
1. The requirements for performance analysis: Always analyze your application before and after application optimization. Tools like PPROF can help ensure that zero -distribution technology does improve performance without making the code unnecessary difficult to maintain.
2. The key strategy of zero -assigning programming
1. Efficient string connection
3. The string in GO is immutable, which means that each modification will create a new string. In order to avoid frequent string allocation, please use and
to connect the string, and avoid using

connecting multiple string in the cycle.

bad example:

<code class="language-go">s := "Hello"
s += " "
s += "World"</code>

Good example:

<code class="language-go">import (
    "bytes"
    "strings"
)

func main() {
    // 使用 bytes.Buffer
    var buffer bytes.Buffer
    buffer.WriteString("Hello")
    buffer.WriteString(" ")
    buffer.WriteString("World")
    fmt.Println(buffer.String()) // 输出：Hello World

    // 使用 strings.Builder
    var builder strings.Builder
    builder.Grow(100) // 可选：预分配空间，预先增长 builder 有助于避免不必要的重新分配。
    builder.WriteString("Hello")
    builder.WriteString(" ")
    builder.WriteString("World")
    fmt.Println(builder.String()) // 输出：Hello World
}</code>

2. Pre -segmentation slices to prevent adjusting the size

Do not dynamically add to slices (this may cause re -distribution), but to allocate it in advance. The unprecedented growth of slices usually leads to stack distribution. By carefully managing the capacity of the slice or avoiding unnecessary adjustment of the size, you can keep the slice on the stack instead of stacking. (Example code is omitted here, because the original example code is incomplete)

3. Use Copy () instead of append ()

Dynamic additional slice may lead to re -distribution. Use more efficient. (Example code is omitted here, because the original example code is incomplete) copy()

4. Pre -setting buffer

Dynamic allocation of memory during runtime usually causes heap distribution, and GC must eventually recover these memory. Rather than creating a new slicing or buffer zone, it is better to allocate reuse buffers in advance to minimize the distribution. (Example code is omitted here, because the original example code is incomplete)

5. Use the stack instead of the heap (avoid escape analysis problems)

If the variable is only used in the function, the escape analysis of GO may allow it to be kept on the stack rather than allocated on the stack.

Escape analysis

—— a compiler technology, which is used to determine whether the variable can be securely assigned to the stack, or to escape to the pile. Unless absolutely necessary, avoid returning pointers to local variables. When the object size is small, the priority use value is not pointer. (Example code is omitted here, because the original example code is incomplete)

6. The allocation of minimized hotspots

The hotspot path is frequently executed code parts (for example, requesting processing programs and loop iterations). Eliminating the distribution in these key parts can bring significant performance improvement. (Example code is omitted here, because the original example code is incomplete)

7. The structure of the fixed key instead of the mapping

Map will dynamically allocate memory. If you know the keys in advance, use the structure. Therefore, the structure has a fixed memory layout, which reduces dynamic distribution. (Example code is omitted here, because the original example code is incomplete)

8. Use sync.pool to reuse objects

Rather than allocating and release objects, it is better to use

to reuse them.

is a powerful tool for managing temporary objects that are often used and discarded. It can be used for use by maintaining reusable objects, thereby helping reduce the cost of distribution and garbage recycling. (Example code is omitted here, because the original example code is incomplete) sync.Pool sync.Pool By applying these strategies, you can write more efficient and more predictable Go code, thereby minimizing the impact of GC and improving the overall performance of the application. Remember that performance analysis is crucial before and after the application of any optimization to ensure that these changes have indeed brought improvements.

The above is the detailed content of Zero-Allocation in Go (Golang). For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!