Home > Backend Development > C++ > Why is `lock(this)` Dangerous in Multithreaded Programming?

Why is `lock(this)` Dangerous in Multithreaded Programming?

Patricia Arquette
Release: 2025-01-31 06:26:09
Original
1000 people have browsed it

Why is `lock(this)` Dangerous in Multithreaded Programming?

Avoid the use of

: hidden dangers in multi -threaded programming lock(this) Microsoft documents are clearly recommended to avoid the use of

at will, and understanding the reasons and potential consequences behind it.

lock(this) The problem of uncontrolled locking

The core of the problem is that it is impossible to control which other threads may lock the same object. This can easily lead to dead locks. Multiple threads wait for each other to release the lock, which eventually causes the system to freeze.

Assume that an object is exposed publicly, anyone can get its reference. If any of these references is used to lock the object, the creator of the object may know nothing about it, which will complicate parallel execution and may cause accident errors.

Destroy the encapsulation and reduce the clarity

Using the illegal packaging principle, the locking mechanism is exposed to public access. This makes it difficult to understand the expected use and behavior of the object. On the contrary, locking with private fields can provide clearer separation of attention points and ensure that locking internally without exposure to unnecessary implementation details. Danger of misunderstandings and string

lock(this) Some misunderstandings have inadvertently contributed to the use of

. One misunderstanding is that the locking object itself is sohow to make the object's non -changeable or avoid modification. This is not the case. The parameter object passed to the

statement is only to identify the key to identify the lock object. Another trap is to try to use a string as a key in the

statement. Because the string is unchanged and shared between applications, this approach may lead to unexpected lock conflicts. Instead, it is best to use private objects as keys to better control the lock mechanism.

lock(this) Case Study: The thread security in parallel treatment lock

In order to explain the potential problem, please consider the following C#code: lock

In the main method, create multiple threads, and each thread tries to perform operations on the object. Method to try to use the lock of the object of

obtaining the object. However, the and methods also try to lock the object directly or indirectly, and use the

as the key. This will lead to unexpected lock conflicts and dead locks, because the code tries to perform operations on it when locking the object of another thread. (It is assumed that the Timewarp and NameChaange methods also use LOCK and use this or Person.name as the lock object. The original text did not provide a complete code)

<code class="language-csharp">public class Person
{
    public int Age { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }

    public void LockThis()
    {
        lock (this)
        {
            System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(10000);
        }
    }
}</code>
Copy after login
In short, use

to destroy thread security and create potential deadlocks. Using private field packaging locking mechanisms, and using private objects as keys in the Person statement, it can provide a more robust and reliable thread synchronization method. LockThis

The above is the detailed content of Why is `lock(this)` Dangerous in Multithreaded Programming?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

source:php.cn
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Latest Articles by Author
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template