This article is part of a series created in partnership with SiteGround. Thank you for supporting the partners who make SitePoint possible.
Net neutrality is now a buzzword-quality term, bandied about by many, but perhaps not paid any real attention by more than a few. The concept of net neutrality is a fairly simple one at its core. It’s the idea that the governments who create rules and regulations for Internet access within a given country, or the companies providing Internet services, will not discriminate Internet traffic.
That is, your provider will not charge you differently for access to Netflix, for example, or throttle your bandwidth to slow your speeds when accessing Hulu. They won’t discriminate in cost or speed of access between the websites or services you’re using, or in any way limit your Internet browsing experience. Some people are staunchly for net neutrality as a principle; others are against it. Those against it are often ISPs and companies that might benefit from a lack of it, and they often use false flag arguments (we could give you faster streaming, we could help protect the Internet from bad actors, etc) to sell their point.
Note that this isn’t theory – prior to the 2015 rulings, Netflix was forced into paying multiple communications providers to not have throttled traffic on their networks.
The reality is that an Internet completely without Net Neutrality rules is one that only favors the large communications providers, and select other corporations. Imagine the money that could be made by extorting large companies into deals to favor their network traffic, or the fees that might have to be paid by small businesses to make it past a bandwidth limitation imposed by ISPs. The possibilities are endless for the broadband providers, and endlessly frustrating to the consumer — the everyday citizen of the Internet, who will have no say in this matter.
Net Neutrality has been, for the most part, the status quo in the United States, with the 2015 FCC rules declaring that broadband Internet providers fall under Title II of the Communications Act. This means that ISPs are now able to be governed as common carriers, and FCC rules could stop those ISPs from throttling or favoring traffic in their lines — forcing ISPs to treat users’ broadband connections as “dumb pipes” through which data flows, rather than attempting to regulate what does and does not appear on your device, and how quickly.
These moves by the FCC have been seen as excessive government regulation by some, especially by those ISPs in question, but the majority of the public on either end of the political spectrum, when the issue is explained to them, seem to favor net neutrality.
The new leadership of the FCC, however, has voted to begin the process of ending the FCC net neutrality rules and de-classifying ISPs as common carriers. This move will end the net neutrality rules that have kept the large broadband providers in check in recent years. You can read the FCC’s public stance here.
There is now a public comment period, where individuals and organizations alike may submit comments, questions, and essentially drum up support, but in the end, a decision will be made, and it seems dubious that the current FCC leadership will protect net neutrality.
Comments on the issue are due to the FCC by July 17, 2017. This will be a slow process either way, but if you want your voice to be heard, you can contact members of Congress or the FCC. Here are a few options for making your voice heard:
And don’t think that these efforts are just for Americans. Those who don’t live in the U.S. will still deal with the ripple effects of the battle there, and many countries are already grappling with the same issues, if they haven’t already lost the fight. Have any thoughts? Let us know in the comments.
The concept of net neutrality has been around since the early days of the internet. It was first introduced in the United States in 2005 by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The principle was further solidified in 2015 when the FCC classified internet service providers as public utilities under Title II of the Communications Act. However, in 2017, the FCC voted to repeal these protections, sparking a nationwide debate about the future of the internet.
Net neutrality is crucial because it ensures that all internet traffic is treated equally. Without it, internet service providers could potentially slow down or block access to certain websites or charge extra fees for faster speeds. This could lead to a tiered internet system where only those who can afford to pay more get access to the best services.
Those against net neutrality argue that it stifles innovation and competition. They believe that internet service providers should be able to charge more for certain services, which could potentially lead to better quality and more diverse offerings. They also argue that net neutrality regulations are an overreach of government authority.
Without net neutrality, consumers could potentially face higher costs for internet services. They could also experience slower speeds or limited access to certain websites. This could particularly impact low-income individuals who may not be able to afford higher-priced services.
Net neutrality is particularly important for small businesses and startups, which rely on the open internet to reach customers and compete with larger companies. Without net neutrality, these businesses could be at a disadvantage if they can’t afford to pay for faster internet speeds.
As of now, net neutrality regulations have been repealed in the United States. However, several states have passed their own net neutrality laws, and there are ongoing legal challenges to the FCC’s decision.
The issue of net neutrality is not just confined to the United States. Many countries around the world have their own regulations regarding net neutrality, with some strongly supporting the principle and others opposing it.
There are several ways to support net neutrality. You can contact your local representatives and urge them to support net neutrality legislation. You can also support organizations that are fighting for net neutrality, such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union.
The future of net neutrality is uncertain. It will likely continue to be a contentious issue, with ongoing debates about the best way to regulate the internet. However, what is clear is that the decisions made about net neutrality will have a significant impact on the future of the internet.
Net neutrality is often seen as a free speech issue. Without it, internet service providers could potentially control what content is available online, which could limit freedom of expression and access to information.
The above is the detailed content of Why Net Neutrality Matters to Web Professionals. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!
![[Web front-end] Node.js quick start](https://img.php.cn/upload/course/000/000/067/662b5d34ba7c0227.png)
