Which should you use mysql utfs utfs?

MySQL UTF8 vs. UTF8MB4: Which should you use?

Choosing Between UTF8 and UTF8MB4

The short answer is: always use UTF8MB4. UTF8 (strictly speaking, utf8mb3) is an older character set that's insufficient for modern applications. While it might seem like a simple choice between two seemingly similar options, the implications of selecting the wrong one can be significant. UTF8MB4 offers vastly superior compatibility and avoids potential data loss and display issues. The slight performance overhead of UTF8MB4 is generally negligible compared to the risks associated with using the outdated UTF8.

What are the key differences between MySQL's UTF8 and UTF8MB4 character sets?

Key Differences Between UTF8 and UTF8MB4

The core difference lies in the number of characters each encoding can represent. UTF8 (again, utf8mb3) is a 3-byte encoding, meaning it uses a maximum of 3 bytes to represent a single character. This limits it to representing characters within the Basic Multilingual Plane (BMP), which covers most common characters but excludes many emojis, symbols, and characters from less common languages.

UTF8MB4, on the other hand, is a 4-byte encoding, capable of representing all characters defined in Unicode, including those outside the BMP. This means it supports a far wider range of characters, encompassing emojis, various symbols, and characters from virtually all languages. This broader support is crucial for applications needing to handle diverse text data, such as social media platforms, international websites, or applications dealing with multilingual content.

In summary:

Feature

UTF8 (

Feature	UTF8 (utf8mb3)	UTF8MB4
Maximum Bytes	3	4
Unicode Support	BMP only	Full Unicode support
Emoji Support	No	Yes
Compatibility	Limited	Broad

)

UTF8MB4

Maximum Bytes

3

4

Unicode Support

BMP only

Full Unicode support

Emoji Support

No

Yes

Compatibility

Limited

Broad

How will choosing between UTF8 and UTF8MB4 impact my database's storage space and performance?

Impact on Storage Space and Performance

Choosing UTF8MB4 will generally increase your database's storage space compared to UTF8. This is because each character can now potentially require 4 bytes instead of 3. The actual increase depends on the proportion of characters outside the BMP in your data. If your data predominantly consists of characters within the BMP, the increase might be minimal or even non-existent. However, for data containing many emojis or characters outside the BMP, the storage increase will be more noticeable.

In terms of performance, the impact is usually negligible. The difference in processing speed between UTF8 and UTF8MB4 is typically insignificant for most applications. Any performance hit from using UTF8MB4 is far outweighed by the benefits of broader character support and avoidance of data corruption. Modern hardware and optimized database systems efficiently handle the slightly increased processing demands of UTF8MB4.

What are the potential consequences of choosing the wrong character set (UTF8 or UTF8MB4) for my application?

Consequences of Choosing the Wrong Character Set

Choosing UTF8 instead of UTF8MB4 can lead to several serious problems:

• Data Loss: If your application needs to store characters outside the BMP (e.g., emojis), these characters will be either truncated, replaced with replacement characters (�), or completely lost when using UTF8. This can lead to data corruption and inaccurate information.
• Display Issues: Characters outside the BMP might not display correctly in your application or on different systems. This can lead to a poor user experience and make your application unusable for users employing characters not supported by UTF8.
• Incompatibility: Your database might become incompatible with other systems or applications that require full Unicode support. This can complicate data exchange and integration with other services.
• Maintenance Headaches: Fixing data loss or display issues caused by incorrect character set selection can be time-consuming and complex, requiring significant effort to migrate or repair your database.

In conclusion, while there's a minor storage overhead, the advantages of UTF8MB4 far outweigh any potential performance drawbacks. Choosing UTF8MB4 ensures compatibility, prevents data loss, and avoids the headaches associated with dealing with character encoding issues later. It's the best practice for modern applications that need to handle diverse textual data.

The above is the detailed content of Which should you use mysql utfs utfs?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!