GPT 4o vs Claude 3.5 vs Gemini 2.0 - Which LLM to Use When

Choosing the right large language model (LLM) can be challenging, given the constant emergence of new models. This post compares three leading contenders: GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, and Gemini 2.0, highlighting their strengths and ideal applications.

Model Overview:

• GPT-4o (OpenAI): Known for its versatility in creative writing, translation, and real-time conversations. Its high processing speed (approximately 109 tokens per second) makes it ideal for quick responses and engaging dialogues.

• Gemini 2.0 (Google): Designed for multimodal tasks, handling text, images, audio, and code. Its integration with Google's ecosystem enhances information retrieval and research assistance.

• Claude 3.5 (Anthropic): Strong in reasoning and coding. While slower (around 23 tokens per second), its larger context window (200,000 tokens) and accuracy make it suitable for complex data analysis and multi-step processes.

Performance Comparison:

The models were tested on coding, reasoning, image generation, and statistical tasks. Here's a summary:

1. Coding: GPT-4o produced well-structured, commented code; Claude 3.5 offered concise solutions; Gemini 2.0 provided functional but less explained code.

2. Reasoning: GPT-4o provided the most detailed reasoning; Claude 3.5 offered a straightforward approach; Gemini 2.0 presented clear, concise logic.

3. Image Generation: Gemini 2.0 generated the most detailed and visually appealing images; GPT-4o produced acceptable results; Claude 3.5's output was less effective. (See image examples below)

GPT-4o Image Example:

Gemini 2.0 Image Example:

Claude 3.5 Image Example:

4. Statistics: All models provided accurate calculations, but GPT-4o offered the most thorough explanations.

Summarized Comparison:

Feature	GPT-4o	Claude 3.5	Gemini 2.0
Code Generation	Excellent accuracy, clear explanations	Strong in complex tasks	Functional, less detailed explanations
Speed	Fast (~109 tokens/sec)	Moderate (~23 tokens/sec)	Variable, generally slower than GPT-4o
Context Handling	Advanced	Excellent for nuanced instructions	Strong multimodal integration
Multimodal	Superior	Primarily text-focused	Strong multimodal capabilities

Conclusion:

Each model excels in specific areas. GPT-4o is best for creative tasks and conversations; Claude 3.5 for complex coding and reasoning; and Gemini 2.0 for multimodal applications. The optimal choice depends on your specific needs.

Frequently Asked Questions:

• Best for creative writing? GPT-4o
• Best for coding and complex workflows? Claude 3.5
• Best for multimodal tasks? Gemini 2.0
• Most detailed reasoning? GPT-4o
• Best image generation? Gemini 2.0

The above is the detailed content of GPT 4o vs Claude 3.5 vs Gemini 2.0 - Which LLM to Use When. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!