The power of words in user interfaces lies in their ability to clearly signal a control's action. Effective copywriting ensures each word resonates with users, providing clarity and direction. However, the nuances of language can sometimes lead to misinterpretations. Synonyms can have context-dependent meanings, and some words carry so much weight they risk being misunderstood.
As both a user and developer, I've experienced the challenges of choosing the right words for user interfaces. This article focuses on words used to signal the completion of actions, guiding users smoothly through processes. The goal is to eliminate ambiguity surrounding actions like canceling, quitting, closing, and navigating.
"Cancel" is a ubiquitous term for ending an action. It signifies a decisive break from a process, often due to unexpected complications or a change of mind. Users might cancel a lengthy form, a purchase due to missing information, or a subscription. The act of canceling often feels personal, signifying a rejection of the current path.
However, problems arise when "cancel" fails to truly cancel the action. For example, submitting a form with errors, then clicking "Cancel," yet still having the incorrect information saved.
Therefore, "cancel" should always offer confirmation. It's an opportunity to rectify errors and provide a clean slate. Instead of simply ending, it's about resetting or retrying. Consider alternatives like "reset" or "retry" for actions where a fresh start is needed.
"Quit" and "exit" denote finality. "Quit" implies a complete cessation, a hard stop with no easy return. "Exiting" suggests a departure, potentially with the possibility of re-entry. In development terms, "quit" signifies a complete shutdown of a process, while "exit" allows for a more graceful disengagement.
However, "quit" should be used sparingly. It's so definitive that it closes off future actions. "Cancel" often serves as a suitable alternative, offering a softer, less permanent option.
"Exit" is the gentler counterpart. It's particularly well-suited for ending human-to-human interactions, such as exiting a chat or group. It suggests a temporary goodbye, leaving the door open for future engagement. Sometimes, a stronger term like "quit" can be more reassuring, conveying a sense of finality and completion.
Web navigation involves movement between different points. "Back" (and "previous") moves laterally within a process or hierarchically to a higher level. Explicit labels like "Home" clarify hierarchical navigation.
I avoid "back" for lateral navigation, preferring more explicit guidance, especially when changing states. For instance, "Save and Go Back" or "Cancel and Go Home" clearly communicate both the action and the subsequent navigation.
"Close" serves dual purposes: navigation and action cancellation. However, I prefer more explicit terms for navigation ("Go Back," "Previous," "Go Home") and for actions ("Save and Close").
"Close" is ideal for pop-up dialogues and modals, where its meaning is clear within the limited context.
"End" is the most straightforward way to signal completion, especially for interactions like "End Chat" or "End Webinar." It signifies the termination of a connection, but not necessarily a permanent one, making it similar to "exit."
The choice of words significantly impacts user experience. While many words can convey "ending," selecting the most appropriate one ensures clarity and avoids misinterpretations. Consider the level of finality, the type of interaction, and the need for confirmation when choosing your words. The goal is unambiguous communication, leading to a smoother and more intuitive user experience.
The above is the detailed content of Close, Exit, Cancel: How to End User Interactions Well. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!
![[Web front-end] Node.js quick start](https://img.php.cn/upload/course/000/000/067/662b5d34ba7c0227.png)
