DeepSeek R1: A Budget-Friendly LLM Rivaling GPT-4 and Claude
Chinese AI innovator DeepSeek has been making waves since the New Year, launching the DeepSeek V3 model (a GPT-4 competitor) and its accompanying mobile app. Their latest offering, DeepSeek R1, is a large language model (LLM) challenging industry leaders at a significantly reduced price. This blog post compares DeepSeek R1 against OpenAI's o1 and Claude Sonnet 3.5, putting its performance claims to the test.
DeepSeek R1: An Overview
DeepSeek R1 is an open-source LLM prioritizing advanced reasoning capabilities. Its unique training methodology leverages reinforcement learning (RL), minimizing reliance on traditional supervised fine-tuning (SFT). This focus on logic, problem-solving, and interpretability makes it well-suited for STEM tasks, coding, and complex Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning. It directly competes with OpenAI's o1 and Claude's Sonnet 3.5. Importantly, DeepSeek R1's API boasts a significantly lower cost—97% cheaper than Sonnet 3.5 and 93% cheaper than o1 (for cache hit input).
Accessing DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1 is accessible via the DeepSeek Chat interface (https://www.php.cn/link/9f3ad7a14cd3d1cf5d73e8ec7205e7f1) or its API (https://www.php.cn/link/23264092bdaf8349c3cec606151be6bd). The chat interface requires account creation or login, then selecting "DeepThink." API access requires obtaining an API key from the developer portal and configuring your development environment. The API base URL is: https://www.php.cn/link/aaf9290b7570c56dd784f192425658d4
DeepSeek R1 vs. OpenAI o1 vs. Claude Sonnet 3.5: A Detailed Comparison
Feature | DeepSeek R1 | OpenAI o1 Series | Claude Sonnet 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|
Training Approach | Reinforcement learning (RL), minimal SFT | Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) RLHF | Supervised fine-tuning RLHF |
Special Methods | Cold-start data, rejection sampling, pure RL | Combines SFT and RL for general versatility | Focused on alignment and safety |
Core Focus | Reasoning-intensive tasks (math, coding, CoT) | General-purpose LLM | Ethical and safe AI, balanced reasoning |
Input Token Cost (per million) | .14 (cache hit), .55 (cache miss) |
.50– | .45–.60 |
Output Token Cost (per million) | .19 | – | |
Affordability | Extremely cost-effective | High cost | Moderately priced |
Accessibility | Fully open-source (free for hosting/customization) | Proprietary, pay-per-use API | Proprietary, pay-per-use API |
Task 1: Logical Reasoning:
Task 2: Scientific Reasoning:
Task 3: Coding Skills:
Task 4: Problem-Solving Skills:
(Detailed results and screenshots of each task's output are included in the original article.)
Final Results and Conclusion
While DeepSeek R1 demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities, particularly in scientific reasoning and coding tasks, it wasn't flawless. Occasional syntax errors and slower response times were observed. OpenAI o1 provided detailed explanations, while Sonnet 3.5 offered speed and conciseness. The choice between these models depends on individual needs and priorities. DeepSeek R1's significant cost advantage makes it a compelling option for users with budget constraints.
(The original article's concluding section, including FAQs, is also included in the original response.)The above is the detailed content of DeepSeek R1 vs OpenAI o1 vs Sonnet 3.5: Battle of Best LLMs. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!