OpenAI's o1 and o1 pro models, offered as part of their 12 Days of OpenAI event with unlimited access via a $200 ChatGPT Pro subscription, sparked considerable debate. This article compares their performance across six diverse challenges to determine the subscription's value.
Challenges and Results:
The models were tested on: solving a complex logic puzzle (Zebra Problem), identifying differences in images, solving a calculus problem, summarizing a technical article, image generation, and creating a flowchart.
Challenge 1: Zebra Problem: o1 pro correctly solved the puzzle, albeit more slowly than o1, which failed. Verdict: o1 ❌ | o1 pro ✅
Challenge 2: Find Differences: Both models struggled, failing to accurately identify all differences. Verdict: o1 ❌ | o1 pro ❌
Challenge 3: Math Problem: Both models provided the correct solution, but o1 was significantly faster. Verdict: o1 ✅ | o1 pro ✅
Challenge 4: Analyzing Article: o1 pro offered a more comprehensive and technically accurate summary of a complex article on building a vector database. Verdict: o1 ❌ | o1 pro ✅
Challenge 5: Image Creation: Neither model supported image generation. Verdict: o1 ❌ | o1 pro ❌
Challenge 6: Flowchart Creation: o1 produced a functional flowchart, while o1 pro only provided text. Verdict: o1 ✅ | o1 pro ❌
Overall Assessment:
o1 pro demonstrated superior performance in complex tasks requiring deeper understanding, while o1 excelled in speed for simpler problems. The $200 subscription's value depends on individual needs. For complex problem-solving, o1 pro offers a significant advantage. However, for less demanding tasks, other, more affordable options might suffice. Given OpenAI's ongoing model development, waiting for future improvements before committing to the subscription is advisable.
The above is the detailed content of o1 vs o1 pro: Is it worth spending $200? - Analytics Vidhya. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!