What is the difference between Promise.all and Promise.allSettled?

What is the difference between Promise.all and Promise.allSettled?

Promise.all and Promise.allSettled are both methods in JavaScript used to handle multiple promises, but they differ in how they treat the promises and the results they return.

Promise.all takes an iterable of promises and returns a single promise that resolves when all of the promises in the iterable have resolved, or rejects immediately upon any of the input promises rejecting. The resolved value of the returned promise is an array of the resolved values of the input promises, in the same order as they were in the iterable.

On the other hand, Promise.allSettled also takes an iterable of promises, but it waits until all promises have either resolved or rejected. The returned promise resolves once all the input promises have settled (either resolved or rejected). The resolved value is an array of objects, where each object describes the outcome of the corresponding promise in the iterable. Each object has a status field, which is either "fulfilled" (for a promise that resolved) or "rejected" (for a promise that rejected), along with a value field (for resolved promises) or a reason field (for rejected promises).

In summary, the key difference lies in how these methods handle promise rejections: Promise.all fails fast, rejecting as soon as any of the promises reject, while Promise.allSettled waits for all promises to either resolve or reject before resolving itself.

How does Promise.all handle promise rejections compared to Promise.allSettled?

Promise.all handles promise rejections differently compared to Promise.allSettled. When using Promise.all, if any of the promises in the iterable reject, the entire Promise.all promise rejects immediately. The rejection reason will be the reason of the first promise that rejected. Any subsequent promises, whether they resolve or reject, do not affect the state of the Promise.all promise, as it has already been rejected.

In contrast, Promise.allSettled does not reject upon encountering a rejected promise. Instead, it continues to wait for all promises in the iterable to either resolve or reject. Once all promises have settled, the Promise.allSettled promise resolves with an array of objects that describe the outcome of each promise.

To illustrate the difference, consider an example where you have three promises: two that resolve quickly and one that rejects after a delay. With Promise.all, the promise would reject as soon as the delayed promise rejects, even if the other two promises have already resolved. With Promise.allSettled, the promise would eventually resolve with an array indicating that two promises resolved and one rejected.

In what scenarios would you choose to use Promise.allSettled over Promise.all?

You would choose to use Promise.allSettled over Promise.all in scenarios where you need to know the outcome of all promises, regardless of whether they resolve or reject. Here are some specific scenarios:

1. Gathering Results from Multiple Sources: If you are fetching data from multiple APIs and you want to proceed with all the results, even if some of the requests fail, Promise.allSettled is ideal. It allows you to process successful responses while handling errors for failed requests.
2. Batch Processing: When you are performing a batch operation and you need to know the status of each operation, Promise.allSettled helps you understand which operations succeeded and which failed without interrupting the whole process.
3. User Experience: In a user interface where you want to show partial results or handle errors gracefully, Promise.allSettled can be used to display all the available data and error messages, improving the user experience by not stopping on the first error.
4. Logging and Monitoring: If you need to log or monitor the outcome of multiple asynchronous operations, Promise.allSettled provides comprehensive results that can be useful for debugging or monitoring purposes.

What are the performance implications of using Promise.all versus Promise.allSettled?

The performance implications of using Promise.all versus Promise.allSettled can be summarized as follows:

1. Speed of Resolution/Rejection: Promise.all can be faster in resolving if all promises resolve quickly, but it will reject immediately if any promise rejects. This can be beneficial in scenarios where early rejection is desirable, as it stops processing further promises. Promise.allSettled, on the other hand, will always wait for all promises to settle, which may take longer if some promises take a long time to reject.
2. Resource Usage: Promise.all may use fewer resources since it stops processing as soon as any promise rejects. Promise.allSettled will continue to process all promises until they settle, potentially using more resources, especially if some promises are long-running or resource-intensive.
3. Error Handling: With Promise.all, you only need to handle a single rejection, which can simplify error handling in some cases. Promise.allSettled requires handling an array of outcomes, which may involve more complex error handling logic.
4. Concurrency Considerations: Both methods support concurrent execution of promises, but Promise.allSettled ensures that all promises are executed to completion. This can be advantageous in scenarios where you need the results of all promises, but it could be a disadvantage if some promises are unnecessary to process further after an initial failure.

In summary, while Promise.all can be faster and more resource-efficient in certain situations, Promise.allSettled provides more comprehensive results at the potential cost of increased processing time and resource usage. The choice between them should be based on the specific requirements of your application.

The above is the detailed content of What is the difference between Promise.all and Promise.allSettled?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!