Unfortunately, clip-path: path() is Still a No-Go
Initially, the prospect of clip-path: path()
in Firefox was incredibly exciting. Imagine effortlessly creating a dynamic shape, like the breathing box shown below, using a single HTML element and minimal CSS – no SVGs or lengthy polygon point lists needed!
This potential thrilled Chris as well. The possibilities seemed endless.
However, my enthusiasm quickly waned upon closer inspection. While clip-path: path()
functions in Firefox (versions 63-70 with a specific flag enabled, and 71 without), a significant limitation emerged: the path coordinates are pixel-based. This means they don't scale responsively.
The MDN examples, using pixel values within the path()
function, highlighted this issue. The path()
function accepts an SVG <path></path>
string, whose coordinates, like the d
attribute in SVG, are unitless pixels. Unlike SVG's viewBox
, these pixels remain fixed within the CSS path()
function, preventing responsive scaling.
This renders the function largely impractical for responsive design. A responsive element clipped with path()
maintains a fixed clipped area regardless of its size. For instance, a square scaling with the viewport will have a statically sized clipped heart shape.
This limitation severely restricts the usefulness of clip-path: path()
. SVG or polygon() approximations remain superior alternatives for most scenarios. Improvements are crucial to make clip-path: path()
a viable option.
Amelia Bellamy-Royds proposed two solutions:
- Support
calc()
values/units within path data. This would extend SVG path syntax. - Introduce a
viewBox
within theclip-path
declaration, allowing scaling.
I favor the first option. The second, while eliminating the need for separate SVGs, offers limited advantage over using SVG directly, which enjoys broader support. The first option, however, would significantly enhance clip-path: path()
, potentially surpassing SVG in convenience for certain applications.
Consider the breathing box example. The SVG implementation requires careful viewBox
configuration to center the shape. The SCSS code, using viewBox
and path commands (M, v, h), generates the necessary path string.
However, creating a breathing effect necessitates quadratic Bézier curves (q), requiring more complex path definitions for both "swollen" and "squished" states. This leads to lengthy, repetitive CSS.
Ideally, using clip-path: path()
with calc()
support and custom properties would allow dynamic control over the shape. A custom property, like --sgn
, could control the sign within calc()
, enabling animation between states with a single path definition. This would greatly simplify the code and ensure responsive scaling. Currently, however, clip-path: path()
falls short of its potential.
The above is the detailed content of Unfortunately, clip-path: path() is Still a No-Go. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

It's out! Congrats to the Vue team for getting it done, I know it was a massive effort and a long time coming. All new docs, as well.

With the recent climb of Bitcoin’s price over 20k $USD, and to it recently breaking 30k, I thought it’s worth taking a deep dive back into creating Ethereum

I had someone write in with this very legit question. Lea just blogged about how you can get valid CSS properties themselves from the browser. That's like this.

The other day, I spotted this particularly lovely bit from Corey Ginnivan’s website where a collection of cards stack on top of one another as you scroll.

I'd say "website" fits better than "mobile app" but I like this framing from Max Lynch:

If we need to show documentation to the user directly in the WordPress editor, what is the best way to do it?

There are a number of these desktop apps where the goal is showing your site at different dimensions all at the same time. So you can, for example, be writing

Questions about purple slash areas in Flex layouts When using Flex layouts, you may encounter some confusing phenomena, such as in the developer tools (d...
