A Comparison of Static Form Providers
Let's explore the world of "Static Form Providers." These services handle the backend complexities of your HTML forms, freeing you from the burden of validation, storage, notifications, and API integrations. While often subscription-based (monthly or annual), their cost typically undercuts more comprehensive form builders that include front-end design tools.
This article compares several popular static form providers:
- Kwes
- Basin
- FieldGoal
- Formcarry
- FormKeep
- Formspree
- FormSubmit
- formX
- Getform
- Netlify Forms
Note: Feature comparisons are based on website information and provider confirmations. Thanks to Kwes, FormKeep, Formspree, FormSubmit, formX, and Netlify Forms for verifying details.
Form Construction, Validation & Spam Filtering
Provider | Custom Components | Front-End Validation | Back-End Validation |
---|---|---|---|
Kwes | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Basin | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
FormKeep | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Formspree | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
FormSubmit | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
formX | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Getform | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Netlify Forms | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Most providers require adding custom HTML attributes to your form elements (text inputs, textareas, etc.). The form's action
attribute points to the provider's URL for submission and processing. FormKeep offers a form designer, but otherwise, styling is your responsibility. Kwes and FormKeep uniquely support custom components. Only Kwes provides front-end and back-end validation, enhancing security. Others rely on HTML5 validation and spam protection.
Provider | Spam Protection |
---|---|
Kwes | AI, Honeypot, Blacklists, Proprietary Tech |
Basin | Akismet, CleanTalk, reCAPTCHA, Honeypot |
FieldGoal | Provided, details unconfirmed |
FormCarry | Akismet, reCAPTCHA |
FormKeep | Provided, details unconfirmed |
Formspree | Akismet, Profanity Filter, Authorized Domains, Custom reCAPTCHA, Honeypot, Custom Filtering |
FormSubmit | reCAPTCHA, Honeypot |
formX | reCAPTCHA, Honeypot |
Getform | Akismet, reCAPTCHA |
Netlify Forms | Akismet, reCAPTCHA, Honeypot |
Kwes boasts a 99.6% spam block rate without extra setup. All providers offer spam protection, employing various methods (reCAPTCHA, Akismet, honeypots, AI). Remember that additional security measures might slightly impact submission rates.
Notifications, Branding & Redirects
Provider | Confirmations | Notifications | Email Routing |
---|---|---|---|
Kwes | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Basin | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
FormKeep | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Formspree | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
FormSubmit | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
formX | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Getform | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Netlify Forms | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
Email confirmations are crucial for user experience. All providers (except FieldGoal) offer confirmations, notifications, and email routing. Some also support alternative notifications (push, Slack).
Provider | White Label | Custom Redirects |
---|---|---|
Kwes | ✅ | ✅ |
Basin | ✅ | ✅ |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ✅ | ✅ |
FormKeep | ✅ | ✅ |
Formspree | ✅ | ✅ |
FormSubmit | ✅ | ✅ |
formX | ✅ | ✅ |
Getform | ✅ | ✅ |
Netlify Forms | ✅ | ✅ |
White labeling allows for branded communications. All providers (except potentially FieldGoal) support this, enhancing brand consistency. Custom redirects improve user flow after submission; most providers offer this (again, FieldGoal's status is unconfirmed).
File Storage, Data Export & API Access
Provider | Upload Storage |
---|---|
Kwes | 200MB/file, 20GB total |
Basin | 100MB/submission |
FieldGoal | Amazon S3 |
FormCarry | 5MB/file, 5GB total |
FormKeep | 2.5GB total |
Formspree | 10MB/file, 10GB total |
FormSubmit | Included, amounts unconfirmed |
formX | ❌ |
Getform | 25MB/submission, 25GB total |
Netlify Forms | 1GB total |
File storage varies significantly. formX lacks this feature. Limits on individual file sizes and total submission sizes are crucial considerations.
Provider | Data Export | API Access |
---|---|---|
Kwes | ✅ | ✅ |
Basin | ✅ | ✅ |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ✅ | ✅ |
FormKeep | ✅ | ✅ |
Formspree | ✅ | ✅ |
FormSubmit | ✅ | ✅ |
formX | ✅ | On demand |
Getform | ✅ | ❌ |
Netlify Forms | ✅ | ✅ |
Data export (CSV, JSON) is essential for analysis and integration. Most providers support this. API access is vital for custom integrations; Getform is the exception, while formX offers it on demand.
Webhooks, Zapier & Analytics
Provider | Webhooks | Zapier |
---|---|---|
Kwes | ✅ | ✅ |
Basin | ✅ | ✅ |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed | ✅ |
FormCarry | ✅ | ✅ |
FormKeep | ✅ | ✅ |
Formspree | ✅ | ✅ |
FormSubmit | ✅ | ❌ |
formX | ✅ | ✅ |
Getform | ✅ | ✅ |
Netlify Forms | ✅ | ✅ |
Webhooks and Zapier integration facilitate third-party connections. FormSubmit is the only provider without Zapier support.
Provider | Analytics |
---|---|
Kwes | ❌ |
Basin | ✅ |
FieldGoal | Unconfirmed |
FormCarry | ❌ |
FormKeep | ✅ |
Formspree | ❌ |
FormSubmit | ❌ |
formX | ✅ |
Getform | ❌ |
Netlify Forms | ❌ |
Analytics dashboards provide valuable insights into form performance. This feature is less common, with only Basin, FormKeep, and formX offering it.
Pricing
(Detailed pricing table omitted for brevity, but original table should be included here for completeness. It would be beneficial to summarize key pricing tiers and features across providers).
Conclusion
Static form providers simplify form integration for static sites. Key features include spam protection, email notifications, and data management capabilities. Consider your specific needs (custom components, validation, analytics) when selecting a provider. The author's personal preference is Kwes, highlighting its strengths in spam protection, usability, and comprehensive validation. Remember to thoroughly evaluate your requirements before making a decision.
The above is the detailed content of A Comparison of Static Form Providers. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

It's out! Congrats to the Vue team for getting it done, I know it was a massive effort and a long time coming. All new docs, as well.

With the recent climb of Bitcoin’s price over 20k $USD, and to it recently breaking 30k, I thought it’s worth taking a deep dive back into creating Ethereum

I had someone write in with this very legit question. Lea just blogged about how you can get valid CSS properties themselves from the browser. That's like this.

The other day, I spotted this particularly lovely bit from Corey Ginnivan’s website where a collection of cards stack on top of one another as you scroll.

I'd say "website" fits better than "mobile app" but I like this framing from Max Lynch:

There are a number of these desktop apps where the goal is showing your site at different dimensions all at the same time. So you can, for example, be writing

If we need to show documentation to the user directly in the WordPress editor, what is the best way to do it?

Questions about purple slash areas in Flex layouts When using Flex layouts, you may encounter some confusing phenomena, such as in the developer tools (d...
