


PHP4 and PHP5 performance testing and comparison Test code and environment_PHP tutorial
作者:heiyeluren
博客:http://blog.csdn.net/heiyeshuwu
时间:2007年8月6日
PHP 4到今年年底PHP Group将不再对其进行支持了,所以为了让大家更有信心的转移到PHP 5平台上,我特别做了这个测试,看看我们PHP 4.x 是否真的性能比我们的PHP 5.x要好捏,测试结果很明显,那就是PHP 5.x 比php 4.x不论是面向对象还是面向过程,都要比PHP 4.x 要快,所以大家完全有必要转移到PHP 5.x 平台上,去体验PHP 5.x 平台的各种功能和性能。
因为PHP 5 包括新的对象模型,更多新特点,更快的处理速度,特别是处理面向对象代码的速度,虽然在php 4中面向对象代码的速度比较一般,但是在PHP5.x中面向对象代码的速度都超过了面向过程的速度,所以不要对面向对象的性能持有怀疑,下面的测试结果将说明这一切。
【测试环境】
- CPU: Intel Pentium4 2.66GHz
- Memory: 1GB
- Disk: 73GB/SCSI
- OS: FreeBSD 4.11
- Web: Apache 1.3.37
测试工具:ab (也可以选用http_load)
名词RPS: Requests per second (每秒的请求数量)
相关
测试工具:ab (也可以选用http_load)
名词RPS: Requests per second (每秒的请求数量)
【PHP 4.4.2 测试结果】
[ 函数 Function ]
function signin(){
echo “test”;
}
signin();
?>
测试结果:ab -n 10000 -c 50 的结果是1047.23/rps
[ 类 Class ]
不实例化类
class User{
function signin(){
echo “test”;
}
}
User::signin();
?>
测试结果:ab -n 10000 -c 50 的结果是 1034.98/rps
实例化类
class User{
function signin(){
echo “test”;
}
}
$user=new User();
$user->signin();
?>
测试结果:ab -n 10000 -c 50 的结果是 1006.14/rps
类的继承
class AUser{
function signin(){}
}
class User extends Auser{
function signin(){
echo “test”;
}
}
$user=new User();
$user->signin();
?>
测试结果:ab -n 10000 -c 50 的结果是 992.95/rps
【PHP 5.2.1测试结果】
[ 函数 Function ]
function signin(){
echo “test”;
}
signin();
?>
测试结果:ab -n 10000 -c 50 的结果是 1176.06/rps
[ 类 Class ]
不实例化类
class User{
public function signin(){
echo “test”;
}
}
User::signin();
?>
测试结果:ab -n 10000 -c 50 的结果是 1197.17/rps
实例化类
class User{
public function signin(){
echo “test”;
}
}
$user=new User();
$user->signin();
?>
测试结果:ab -n 10000 -c 50 的结果是 1187.93/rps
类的继承和抽象
abstract class AUser{
abstract function signin();
}
class User extends Auser{
public function signin(){
echo “test”;
}
}
$user=new User();
$user->signin();
?>
测试结果:ab -n 10000 -c 50 的结果是 1128.54/rps
【测试结果和分析】
[ 测试结果数据 ]
版本 | 函数测试 | 不实例化类 | 实例化类 | 类的继承 |
PHP 4.4.2 | 1047.23/rps | 1034.98/rps | 1006.14/rps | 992.95/rps |
PHP 5.2.1 | 1176.06/rps | 1197.17/rps | 1187.93/rps | 1128.54/rps |
[Result Analysis]
1. Generally speaking, it is obvious that the performance of PHP5.2 is slightly higher than that of PHP4.4, so don’t doubt that the performance of PHP5.2 will be worse, it is obviously faster than PHP4
2. The parsing performance of classes in PHP4.4 is obviously slower than that of functions, especially when inheritance is used, it drops sharply, so it is more suitable in PHP4.4 Using process-oriented and non-inherited class operations
3. The result in PHP5.2 is that the execution speed of classes is faster than that of functions. It can be seen that the PHP5.2 engine spends a lot of time on object-oriented processing. A lot of effort, and at the same time, whether they are functions or classes, their performance is good
4. Through this test, we have every reason to upgrade PHP4 to PHP5 with little code change. Moreover, PHP5 is basically backward compatible with PHP4 code, except for some special codes. In addition, it is mentioned above that PHP Group will no longer continue to maintain PHP4 after the end of this year, so upgrade early and have peace of mind.
PS: Thanks to my colleague Jianxiang for providing some test codes

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics





Performance comparison of different Java frameworks: REST API request processing: Vert.x is the best, with a request rate of 2 times SpringBoot and 3 times Dropwizard. Database query: SpringBoot's HibernateORM is better than Vert.x and Dropwizard's ORM. Caching operations: Vert.x's Hazelcast client is superior to SpringBoot and Dropwizard's caching mechanisms. Suitable framework: Choose according to application requirements. Vert.x is suitable for high-performance web services, SpringBoot is suitable for data-intensive applications, and Dropwizard is suitable for microservice architecture.

The performance comparison of PHP array key value flipping methods shows that the array_flip() function performs better than the for loop in large arrays (more than 1 million elements) and takes less time. The for loop method of manually flipping key values takes a relatively long time.

Since the launch of ChatGLM-6B on March 14, 2023, the GLM series models have received widespread attention and recognition. Especially after ChatGLM3-6B was open sourced, developers are full of expectations for the fourth-generation model launched by Zhipu AI. This expectation has finally been fully satisfied with the release of GLM-4-9B. The birth of GLM-4-9B In order to give small models (10B and below) more powerful capabilities, the GLM technical team launched this new fourth-generation GLM series open source model: GLM-4-9B after nearly half a year of exploration. This model greatly compresses the model size while ensuring accuracy, and has faster inference speed and higher efficiency. The GLM technical team’s exploration has not

Effective techniques for optimizing C++ multi-threaded performance include limiting the number of threads to avoid resource contention. Use lightweight mutex locks to reduce contention. Optimize the scope of the lock and minimize the waiting time. Use lock-free data structures to improve concurrency. Avoid busy waiting and notify threads of resource availability through events.

How to implement HTTP streaming in C++? Create an SSL stream socket using Boost.Asio and the asiohttps client library. Connect to the server and send an HTTP request. Receive HTTP response headers and print them. Receives the HTTP response body and prints it.

Produced by 51CTO technology stack (WeChat ID: blog51cto) Mistral released its first code model Codestral-22B! What’s crazy about this model is not only that it’s trained on over 80 programming languages, including Swift, etc. that many code models ignore. Their speeds are not exactly the same. It is required to write a "publish/subscribe" system using Go language. The GPT-4o here is being output, and Codestral is handing in the paper so fast that it’s hard to see! Since the model has just been launched, it has not yet been publicly tested. But according to the person in charge of Mistral, Codestral is currently the best-performing open source code model. Friends who are interested in the picture can move to: - Hug the face: https

In PHP, the conversion of arrays to objects will have an impact on performance, mainly affected by factors such as array size, complexity, object class, etc. To optimize performance, consider using custom iterators, avoiding unnecessary conversions, batch converting arrays, and other techniques.

According to benchmarks, for small, high-performance applications, Quarkus (fast startup, low memory) or Micronaut (TechEmpower excellent) are ideal choices. SpringBoot is suitable for large, full-stack applications, but has slightly slower startup times and memory usage.
