typeof in JavaScript is actually very complex. It can be used to do many things, but it also has many weird behaviors. This article lists its multiple uses, and also points out existing problems and solutions.
The premise of reading this article is that you should now know the difference between primitive values and object values.
Check whether a variable exists and whether it has a value
typeof will return "undefined" in two cases:
The variable is not declared
The value of the variable is undefined
For example:
> typeof undeclaredVariable === "undefined"
true
> var declaredVariable;
> typeof declaredVariable
'undefined'
&g t; typeof undefined
'undefined'
There are other ways to detect whether a value is undefined:
> var value = undefined;
> value === undefined
true
But if this method is used in an undeclared When the variable is on, an exception will be thrown, because only typeof can detect undeclared variables normally without reporting an error:
> undeclaredVariable === undefined
ReferenceError: undeclaredVariable is not defined
Note : Uninitialized variables, formal parameters without passed parameters, and non-existent properties will not have the above problems, because they are always accessible and the value is always undefined:
> var declaredVariable;
> declaredVariable === undefined
true
> (function (x) { return x === undefined }())
true
> ({}).foo = == undefined
true
Translator's Note: Therefore, if you want to detect the existence of a global variable that may not be declared, you can also use if(window.maybeUndeclaredVariable){}.
Problem: typeof seems very complicated when completing such a task.
Solution: This kind of operation is not very common, so some people feel that there is no need to find a better solution. But maybe someone will propose a special operator:
> defined undeclaredVariable
false
> var declaredVariable; Whether the variable is declared by the declaration:
& & gt; Declared UndeClaredvariable
false
& & gt; Var Declaredvariable; DEFINED The operator is equivalent to defined(), and the declared operator above is equivalent to exists().
Determine whether a value is equal to undefined or null
Problem: If you want to detect whether a value has been defined (the value is neither undefined nor null), then you have encountered one of the most famous weird manifestations of typeof ( Considered a bug): typeof null returned "object":
> typeof null
'object'
Translator's Note: This can only be said to be a bug in the original JavaScript implementation, and now the standard is This is standardized. V8 once corrected and implemented typeof null === "null", but it ultimately proved unfeasible. http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:typeof_null.
(Annotation: typeof returns "object" when operating on null. This is a bug in the JavaScript language itself. Unfortunately, this bug will never be fixed because too much existing code already relies on this Performance. But is null an object? There is a discussion on this issue on stackoverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/801032/null-object-in-javascript/7968470@justjavac)
Solved Solution: Don’t use typeof to do this task, use the following function instead:
function isDefined(x) {
return x !== null && x !== undefined;
}
another One possibility is to introduce a "default value operator". If myValue is not defined, the following expression will return defaultValue:
myValue ?? defaultValue
The above expression is equivalent to:
(myValue !== undefined && myValue !== null) ? myValue : defaultValue
Or:
myValue ??= defaultValue
is actually a simplification of the following statement:
myValue = myValue ??defaultValue
When you access a nested property, such as bar, you may need the help of this operator:
obj.foo.bar
If obj or obj.foo is undefined, The above expression will throw an exception. An operator .?? allows the above expression to return the first encountered attribute whose value is undefined or null when traversing the attributes layer by layer:
obj.??foo.??bar
The above expression is equivalent to:
(obj === undefined || obj === null) ? obj
: (obj.foo === undefined || obj.foo === null) ? obj.foo
: obj.foo.bar
Distinguish between object values and primitive values
The following function is used to detect whether x Is an object value:
function isObject(x) {
return (typeof x === "function"
}Problem: The above detection is more complicated because typeof treats functions and objects as different types, and typeof null returns "object". Solution: The following method is also often used to detect objects Value: function isObject2(x) { return x === Object(x);}Warning: You may think that you can use instanceof Object to detect here, but instanceof uses an object by using The prototype is used to determine the instance relationship, so what to do with objects without prototypes: > var obj = Object.create(null);> Object.getPrototypeOf(obj)nullobj Indeed is an object, but it is not an instance of any value: > typeof obj'object'> obj instanceof ObjectfalseIn practice, you may rarely encounter such an object , but it does exist and has its uses. Translator’s Note: Object.prototype is the only built-in object without a prototype. & & Gt; object.getprototypeof (object.prototype) null & gt; Typeoflact.protothpe'Object' & gt; Object.Prototype What is the type of Object lFalse original value ?typeof is the best way to check the type of a primitive value. > typeof "abc"'string'> typeof undefined'undefined'Problem: You must be aware of the weird behavior of typeof null. > typeof null // Be careful! 'object'Solution: The following function can fix this problem (only for this use case). function getPrimitiveTypeName(x) { var typeName = typeof x; switch(typeName) { case "undefined": case "boolean": case "number": case " string": default: // None of the previous judgments passed throw new TypeError("The parameter is not a primitive value: "+x); }}A better solution: implement a function getTypeName(), which can not only return the type of the original value, but also the object The internal [[Class]] attribute of the value. Here is how to implement this function (Translator's Note: $.type in jQuery is such an implementation) Whether a certain value is a functiontypeof can be used to detect whether a value is a function. > typeof function () {}'function'> typeof Object.prototype.toString'function'In principle, instanceof Function can also detect this requirement. At first glance, it seems that the writing method is more elegant. However, browsers have a quirk: every frame and window has its own global variables. Therefore, if you pass an object from one frame to another, instanceof will not work properly because the two frames have different constructors. This is why there is Array.isArray() method in ECMAScript5. It would be nice if there was a cross-framework method for checking whether an object is an instance of a given constructor. The getTypeName() above is a workaround available, but there may be a more fundamental solution. OverviewThe following mentioned should be the most urgently needed in JavaScript at present, which can replace some of the functional features of typeof’s current responsibilities: isDefined() (such as Object.isDefined()): can be used as A function or an operator isObject() getTypeName() A cross-framework mechanism to detect whether an object is an instance of a specified constructor Check a variable Had such a requirement been declared, it might not be necessary to have its own operator.