


The reason why jQuery's Each is much slower than JS's native for loop
In fact, looking at the source code of jQuery, I found that the code of each is very simple, but why is the performance different from the native for loop by dozens of times?
jQuery's core code of each
for (; i < length; i++) { value = callback.call(obj[i], i, obj[i]); if (value === false) { break; } }
Looks very simple, but why is it so much slower?
Write the test code as follows:
var length=300000; function GetArr() { var t = []; for (var i = 0; i < length; i++) { t[i] = i; } return t; } function each1(obj, callback) { var i = 0; var length = obj.length for (; i < length; i++) { value = callback(i, obj[i]); /* if ( value === false ) {去掉了判断 break; }*/ } } function each2(obj, callback) { var i = 0; var length = obj.length for (; i < length; i++) { value = callback(i, obj[i]);/*去掉了call*/ if (value === false) { break; } } } function each3(obj, callback) { var i = 0; var length = obj.length for (; i < length; i++) { value = callback.call(obj[i], i, obj[i]);/*自己写的call*/ if (value === false) { break; } } } function Test1() { var t = GetArr(); var date1 = new Date().getTime(); var lengtharr = t.length; var total = 0; each1(t, function (i, n) { total += n; }); var date12 = new Date().getTime(); console.log("1Test" + ((date12 - date1))); } function Test2() { var t = GetArr(); var date1 = new Date().getTime(); var total = 0; each2(t, function (i, n) { total += n; }); var date12 = new Date().getTime(); console.log("2Test" + ((date12 - date1))); } function Test3() { var t = GetArr(); var date1 = new Date().getTime(); var total = 0; each3(t, function (i, n) { total += n; }); var date12 = new Date().getTime(); console.log("3Test" + ((date12 - date1))); } function Test4() { var t = GetArr(); var date1 = new Date().getTime(); var total = 0; $.each(t, function (i, n) { total += n; }); var date12 = new Date().getTime(); console.log("4Test" + ((date12 - date1))); }
Run the test and find that the difference between the first and second is not very big, which shows that the performance difference caused by the break judgment is very small, but the first The deviation between the second and third, and the fourth is more than double, and the only difference between the second and the third is that call is called. It seems that call will cause performance loss, because call will switch context. Of course, jQuery There are other reasons why each is slow. It also calls other methods in the loop, and call is just one reason.
Therefore, it can be said that call and apply are relatively performance-consuming methods in js. When performance requirements are strict, it is recommended to use them sparingly.
Let’s look at the performance comparison between jquery’s each and js native for loop through a piece of code
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head runat="server"> <title>for与each性能比较</title> <script src="../Cks/jquery-1.7.1.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"> function getSelectLength() { var time1 = new Date().getTime(); var len = $("#select_test").find("option").length; var selectObj = $("#select_test"); for (var i = 0; i < len; i++) { if (selectObj.get(0).options[i].text == "111111") { selectObj.get(0).options[i].selected = true; break; } } var time2 = new Date().getTime(); alert("for循环执行时间:" + (time2 - time1)); time1 = new Date().getTime(); $("#select_test").find("option").each(function () { if ($(this).text() == "111111") { $(this)[0].selected = true; } }); time2 = new Date().getTime(); alert("each循环执行时间:" + (time2 - time1)); } </script> </head> <body> <form id="form1" runat="server"> <div><select id="select_test"> <option value='1'>111111</option> <option value='2'>222222</option> <option value='3'>333333</option> <option value='4'>444444</option> <option value='5'>5</option> <option value='6'>6</option> <option value='7'>7</option> <option value='8'>8</option> <option value='9'>9</option> <option value='10'>10</option> <option value='11'>11</option> <option value='12'>12</option> <option value='13'>13</option> <option value='14'>14</option> <option value='15'>15</option> <option value='16'>16</option> <option value='17'>17</option> <option value='18'>18</option> <option value='19'>19</option> <option value='20'>20</option> </select><input type="button" value="开始比较" onclick="getSelectLength();" /></div> <div> </form> </body> </html>
Input discrepancy:
for loop execution time: 1
each loop execution time: 3
The two results directly illustrate the problem.
The above is the reason why the jQuery Each is much slower than the JS native for loop performance introduced by the editor. I hope it will be helpful to you. If you have any questions, please leave me a message and the editor will Reply to everyone promptly. I would also like to thank you all for your support of the PHP Chinese website!
For more related articles on why jQuery's Each is much slower than JS's native for loop, please pay attention to the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Detailed explanation of JavaScript string replacement method and FAQ This article will explore two ways to replace string characters in JavaScript: internal JavaScript code and internal HTML for web pages. Replace string inside JavaScript code The most direct way is to use the replace() method: str = str.replace("find","replace"); This method replaces only the first match. To replace all matches, use a regular expression and add the global flag g: str = str.replace(/fi

This tutorial shows you how to integrate a custom Google Search API into your blog or website, offering a more refined search experience than standard WordPress theme search functions. It's surprisingly easy! You'll be able to restrict searches to y

So here you are, ready to learn all about this thing called AJAX. But, what exactly is it? The term AJAX refers to a loose grouping of technologies that are used to create dynamic, interactive web content. The term AJAX, originally coined by Jesse J

This article series was rewritten in mid 2017 with up-to-date information and fresh examples. In this JSON example, we will look at how we can store simple values in a file using JSON format. Using the key-value pair notation, we can store any kind

Leverage jQuery for Effortless Web Page Layouts: 8 Essential Plugins jQuery simplifies web page layout significantly. This article highlights eight powerful jQuery plugins that streamline the process, particularly useful for manual website creation

Core points This in JavaScript usually refers to an object that "owns" the method, but it depends on how the function is called. When there is no current object, this refers to the global object. In a web browser, it is represented by window. When calling a function, this maintains the global object; but when calling an object constructor or any of its methods, this refers to an instance of the object. You can change the context of this using methods such as call(), apply(), and bind(). These methods call the function using the given this value and parameters. JavaScript is an excellent programming language. A few years ago, this sentence was

jQuery is a great JavaScript framework. However, as with any library, sometimes it’s necessary to get under the hood to discover what’s going on. Perhaps it’s because you’re tracing a bug or are just curious about how jQuery achieves a particular UI

This post compiles helpful cheat sheets, reference guides, quick recipes, and code snippets for Android, Blackberry, and iPhone app development. No developer should be without them! Touch Gesture Reference Guide (PDF) A valuable resource for desig
