


The reason why jQuery's Each is much slower than JS's native for loop
In fact, looking at the source code of jQuery, I found that the code of each is very simple, but why is the performance different from the native for loop by dozens of times?
jQuery's core code of each
for (; i < length; i++) { value = callback.call(obj[i], i, obj[i]); if (value === false) { break; } }
Looks very simple, but why is it so much slower?
Write the test code as follows:
var length=300000; function GetArr() { var t = []; for (var i = 0; i < length; i++) { t[i] = i; } return t; } function each1(obj, callback) { var i = 0; var length = obj.length for (; i < length; i++) { value = callback(i, obj[i]); /* if ( value === false ) {去掉了判断 break; }*/ } } function each2(obj, callback) { var i = 0; var length = obj.length for (; i < length; i++) { value = callback(i, obj[i]);/*去掉了call*/ if (value === false) { break; } } } function each3(obj, callback) { var i = 0; var length = obj.length for (; i < length; i++) { value = callback.call(obj[i], i, obj[i]);/*自己写的call*/ if (value === false) { break; } } } function Test1() { var t = GetArr(); var date1 = new Date().getTime(); var lengtharr = t.length; var total = 0; each1(t, function (i, n) { total += n; }); var date12 = new Date().getTime(); console.log("1Test" + ((date12 - date1))); } function Test2() { var t = GetArr(); var date1 = new Date().getTime(); var total = 0; each2(t, function (i, n) { total += n; }); var date12 = new Date().getTime(); console.log("2Test" + ((date12 - date1))); } function Test3() { var t = GetArr(); var date1 = new Date().getTime(); var total = 0; each3(t, function (i, n) { total += n; }); var date12 = new Date().getTime(); console.log("3Test" + ((date12 - date1))); } function Test4() { var t = GetArr(); var date1 = new Date().getTime(); var total = 0; $.each(t, function (i, n) { total += n; }); var date12 = new Date().getTime(); console.log("4Test" + ((date12 - date1))); }
Run the test and find that the difference between the first and second is not very big, which shows that the performance difference caused by the break judgment is very small, but the first The deviation between the second and third, and the fourth is more than double, and the only difference between the second and the third is that call is called. It seems that call will cause performance loss, because call will switch context. Of course, jQuery There are other reasons why each is slow. It also calls other methods in the loop, and call is just one reason.
Therefore, it can be said that call and apply are relatively performance-consuming methods in js. When performance requirements are strict, it is recommended to use them sparingly.
Let’s look at the performance comparison between jquery’s each and js native for loop through a piece of code
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head runat="server"> <title>for与each性能比较</title> <script src="../Cks/jquery-1.7.1.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"> function getSelectLength() { var time1 = new Date().getTime(); var len = $("#select_test").find("option").length; var selectObj = $("#select_test"); for (var i = 0; i < len; i++) { if (selectObj.get(0).options[i].text == "111111") { selectObj.get(0).options[i].selected = true; break; } } var time2 = new Date().getTime(); alert("for循环执行时间:" + (time2 - time1)); time1 = new Date().getTime(); $("#select_test").find("option").each(function () { if ($(this).text() == "111111") { $(this)[0].selected = true; } }); time2 = new Date().getTime(); alert("each循环执行时间:" + (time2 - time1)); } </script> </head> <body> <form id="form1" runat="server"> <div><select id="select_test"> <option value='1'>111111</option> <option value='2'>222222</option> <option value='3'>333333</option> <option value='4'>444444</option> <option value='5'>5</option> <option value='6'>6</option> <option value='7'>7</option> <option value='8'>8</option> <option value='9'>9</option> <option value='10'>10</option> <option value='11'>11</option> <option value='12'>12</option> <option value='13'>13</option> <option value='14'>14</option> <option value='15'>15</option> <option value='16'>16</option> <option value='17'>17</option> <option value='18'>18</option> <option value='19'>19</option> <option value='20'>20</option> </select><input type="button" value="开始比较" onclick="getSelectLength();" /></div> <div> </form> </body> </html>
Input discrepancy:
for loop execution time: 1
each loop execution time: 3
The two results directly illustrate the problem.
The above is the reason why the jQuery Each is much slower than the JS native for loop performance introduced by the editor. I hope it will be helpful to you. If you have any questions, please leave me a message and the editor will Reply to everyone promptly. I would also like to thank you all for your support of the PHP Chinese website!
For more related articles on why jQuery's Each is much slower than JS's native for loop, please pay attention to the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics



Frequently Asked Questions and Solutions for Front-end Thermal Paper Ticket Printing In Front-end Development, Ticket Printing is a common requirement. However, many developers are implementing...

There is no absolute salary for Python and JavaScript developers, depending on skills and industry needs. 1. Python may be paid more in data science and machine learning. 2. JavaScript has great demand in front-end and full-stack development, and its salary is also considerable. 3. Influencing factors include experience, geographical location, company size and specific skills.

How to merge array elements with the same ID into one object in JavaScript? When processing data, we often encounter the need to have the same ID...

JavaScript is the cornerstone of modern web development, and its main functions include event-driven programming, dynamic content generation and asynchronous programming. 1) Event-driven programming allows web pages to change dynamically according to user operations. 2) Dynamic content generation allows page content to be adjusted according to conditions. 3) Asynchronous programming ensures that the user interface is not blocked. JavaScript is widely used in web interaction, single-page application and server-side development, greatly improving the flexibility of user experience and cross-platform development.

In-depth discussion of the root causes of the difference in console.log output. This article will analyze the differences in the output results of console.log function in a piece of code and explain the reasons behind it. �...

Discussion on the realization of parallax scrolling and element animation effects in this article will explore how to achieve similar to Shiseido official website (https://www.shiseido.co.jp/sb/wonderland/)...

Once you have mastered the entry-level TypeScript tutorial, you should be able to write your own code in an IDE that supports TypeScript and compile it into JavaScript. This tutorial will dive into various data types in TypeScript. JavaScript has seven data types: Null, Undefined, Boolean, Number, String, Symbol (introduced by ES6) and Object. TypeScript defines more types on this basis, and this tutorial will cover all of them in detail. Null data type Like JavaScript, null in TypeScript

JavaScript can be run in PowerPoint, and can be implemented by calling external JavaScript files or embedding HTML files through VBA. 1. To use VBA to call JavaScript files, you need to enable macros and have VBA programming knowledge. 2. Embed HTML files containing JavaScript, which are simple and easy to use but are subject to security restrictions. Advantages include extended functions and flexibility, while disadvantages involve security, compatibility and complexity. In practice, attention should be paid to security, compatibility, performance and user experience.
