Example of laravel enabling cross-domain functionality
This article mainly introduces you to the relevant information on how to enable cross-domain functions in Laravel. The article introduces it in great detail through sample code. It has certain reference learning value for everyone's study or work. Friends who need it can follow below. Let’s learn together.
Preface
This article mainly introduces to you the relevant content about laravel enabling cross-domain functions, and shares it for your reference and study. The following words Not much more to say, let’s take a look at the detailed introduction.
Cross-domain requests
For security reasons, browsers will limit cross-domain requests in Script. Since XMLHttpRequest follows the same-origin policy, all applications that use XMLHttpRequest to construct HTTP requests can only access their own domain names. If they need to construct cross-domain requests, developers need to cooperate with the browser to make some configurations that allow cross-domain requests.
The W3C Application Working Group recommends a cross-resource sharing mechanism that allows Web application servers to support cross-site access control, thereby making it possible to secure cross-site data transmission. This mechanism uses several This method extends the original mode:
The response header should be appended with Access-Control-Allow-Orign to indicate which request sources are allowed to access resource content
The browser will verify the match between the request source and the value in the response
For cross-domain requests, the browser will pre-send a non-simple method to determine whether a given resource is ready to accept cross-domain resource access
The server application determines whether the request is cross-domain by checking the Orign in the request header.
Cross-origin resource sharing standard
The cross-origin resource sharing standard allows the server to Can declare which sources can access resources on this server through browsers. In addition, for HTTP request methods that will cause destructive responses to server data (especially HTTP methods other than GET, or POST requests with certain MIME types), the standard strongly requires that the browser must first send a preset request in the OPTIONS request method. request (preflight request) to obtain the HTTP methods supported by the server for cross-origin requests. After confirming that the server allows cross-origin requests, send the real request with the actual HTTP request method. The server can also notify the client whether credit information (including cookies and HTTP authentication related data) needs to be sent along with the request.
The cross-origin sharing standard requires the cooperation of the browser and the server to complete. Currently, browser manufacturers can automatically complete the request part, so the focus of cross-origin resource access is still on the server side.
The following lists some response headers and request headers available in the standard.
Response Header
Access-Control-Allow-Origin: Indicates which request sources are allowed to access resources, the value can be "*", "null", or a single source address.
Access-Control-Allow-Credentials : Indicates whether the response is exposed when the creadentials identifier is omitted from the request. For pre-requests, it indicates that the user credentials can be included in the actual request.
Access-Control-Expose-Headers : Specifies which header information can be safely exposed to the CORS API specification API.
Access-Control-Max-Age : Indicates how long pre-requests can be stored in the pre-request cache.
Access-Control-Allow-Methods: For pre-requests, which request methods can be used for actual requests.
Access-Control-Allow-Headers: For pre-requests, indicates which header information can be used in the actual request.
Origin: Indicates the origin of pre-request or cross-domain request.
Access-Control-Request-Method: For pre-requests, indicate which request methods in pre-requests can be used in actual requests.
Access-Control-Request-Headers: Indicates which header information in the pre-request can be used in the actual request.
Request Header
Origin: Indicates the origin of the request or pre-request.
Access-Control-Request-Method: Bring this request header when sending a pre-request to indicate the request method that will be used in the actual request.
Access-Control-Request-Headers: This request header is included when sending the pre-request, indicating the request headers that the actual request will carry.
Middleware
To allow cross-domain requests in Laravel, we can build a middleware that appends responses to add special processing for cross-domain requests. The response header of the domain request:
<?php namespace App\Http\Middleware; use Closure; use Response; class EnableCrossRequestMiddleware { /** * Handle an incoming request. * * @param \Illuminate\Http\Request $request * @param \Closure $next * @return mixed */ public function handle($request, Closure $next) { $response = $next($request); $response->header('Access-Control-Allow-Origin', config('app.allow')); $response->header('Access-Control-Allow-Headers', 'Origin, Content-Type, Cookie, Accept'); $response->header('Access-Control-Allow-Methods', 'GET, POST, PATCH, PUT, OPTIONS'); $response->header('Access-Control-Allow-Credentials', 'true'); return $response; } }
There are the following things to note:
For cross-domain access requests that need to be accompanied by authentication information, you need to specify withCredentials as true in the XMLHttpRequest instance.
You can build this middleware according to your own needs. If you need to include authentication information (including cookie, session) in the request, then you need to specify Access-Control-Allow-Credentials as true, Because for pre-requests, if you do not specify the response header, the browser will directly ignore the response.
When Access-Control-Allow-Credentials is specified as true in the response, Access-Control-Allow-Origin cannot be specified as *
Post-middleware will only add response headers when responding normally. If an exception occurs, the response will not go through the middleware.
Summarize
The above is the detailed content of Example of laravel enabling cross-domain functionality. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Database operations in PHP are simplified using ORM, which maps objects into relational databases. EloquentORM in Laravel allows you to interact with the database using object-oriented syntax. You can use ORM by defining model classes, using Eloquent methods, or building a blog system in practice.

Laravel - Artisan Commands - Laravel 5.7 comes with new way of treating and testing new commands. It includes a new feature of testing artisan commands and the demonstration is mentioned below ?

The latest versions of Laravel 9 and CodeIgniter 4 provide updated features and improvements. Laravel9 adopts MVC architecture and provides functions such as database migration, authentication and template engine. CodeIgniter4 uses HMVC architecture to provide routing, ORM and caching. In terms of performance, Laravel9's service provider-based design pattern and CodeIgniter4's lightweight framework give it excellent performance. In practical applications, Laravel9 is suitable for complex projects that require flexibility and powerful functions, while CodeIgniter4 is suitable for rapid development and small applications.

Compare the data processing capabilities of Laravel and CodeIgniter: ORM: Laravel uses EloquentORM, which provides class-object relational mapping, while CodeIgniter uses ActiveRecord to represent the database model as a subclass of PHP classes. Query builder: Laravel has a flexible chained query API, while CodeIgniter’s query builder is simpler and array-based. Data validation: Laravel provides a Validator class that supports custom validation rules, while CodeIgniter has less built-in validation functions and requires manual coding of custom rules. Practical case: User registration example shows Lar

PHP Unit and Integration Testing Guide Unit Testing: Focus on a single unit of code or function and use PHPUnit to create test case classes for verification. Integration testing: Pay attention to how multiple code units work together, and use PHPUnit's setUp() and tearDown() methods to set up and clean up the test environment. Practical case: Use PHPUnit to perform unit and integration testing in Laravel applications, including creating databases, starting servers, and writing test code.

When choosing a framework for large projects, Laravel and CodeIgniter each have their own advantages. Laravel is designed for enterprise-level applications, offering modular design, dependency injection, and a powerful feature set. CodeIgniter is a lightweight framework more suitable for small to medium-sized projects, emphasizing speed and ease of use. For large projects with complex requirements and a large number of users, Laravel's power and scalability are more suitable. For simple projects or situations with limited resources, CodeIgniter's lightweight and rapid development capabilities are more ideal.

For beginners, CodeIgniter has a gentler learning curve and fewer features, but covers basic needs. Laravel offers a wider feature set but has a slightly steeper learning curve. In terms of performance, both Laravel and CodeIgniter perform well. Laravel has more extensive documentation and active community support, while CodeIgniter is simpler, lightweight, and has strong security features. In the practical case of building a blogging application, Laravel's EloquentORM simplifies data manipulation, while CodeIgniter requires more manual configuration.

Comparing Laravel's Blade and CodeIgniter's Twig template engine, choose based on project needs and personal preferences: Blade is based on MVC syntax, which encourages good code organization and template inheritance. Twig is a third-party library that provides flexible syntax, powerful filters, extended support, and security sandboxing.
