Shiro authorization implementation principle example sharing

Authorization, also called access control, is to control who can access which resources in the application (such as accessing pages/editing data/page operations, etc.). There are several key objects that need to be understood in authorization: Subject, Resource, Permission, and Role. This article mainly introduces to you the implementation principle of shiro authorization. The editor thinks it is quite good, so I will share it with you now and give you a reference. Let’s follow the editor to take a look, I hope it can help everyone.

Subject

The subject is the user who accesses the application. Subject is used in Shiro to represent the user. Users are only allowed to access corresponding resources after authorization.

Resources

Anything that users can access in the application, such as accessing JSP pages, viewing/editing certain data, accessing a Business methods, printed text, etc. are all resources. Users can access only after authorization.

Permissions

The atomic authorization unit in the security policy. Through permissions, we can indicate whether the user has the authority to operate a certain resource in the application. . That is, permissions indicate whether the user can access a certain resource in the application, such as:

Access the user list page

View/add/modify/delete user data (i.e. Many times it is CRUD (Add, Check, Modify and Delete) permission control)

Print documents and so on. . .

As can be seen from the above, permissions represent whether the user has the right to operate a certain resource, that is, whether the operation on a certain resource is allowed or not, and does not reflect who performs the operation. Therefore, it is necessary to grant permissions to users in the future, that is, to define which user is allowed to do what operations (permissions) on a certain resource. Shiro will not do this, but will be provided by the implementer.

Shiro supports coarse-grained permissions (such as all permissions of the user module) and fine-grained permissions (permissions to operate a certain user, that is, instance level), which will be introduced in the subsequent sections.

Role

A role represents a collection of operations, which can be understood as a collection of permissions. Under normal circumstances, we will give users roles instead of permissions, that is, such users You can have a set of permissions, which is more convenient when granting permissions. Typical examples include: project manager, technical director, CTO, development engineer, etc. are all roles, and different roles have a different set of permissions.
Implicit role: that is, directly verifying whether the user has operation permissions through the role. For example, in the application, the CTO, technical director, and development engineer can use the printer. Suppose that the development engineer is not allowed to use the printer on a certain day. At this time, you need to access the printer from the application. Delete the corresponding code; for another example, in the application, the CTO and technical director can view users and view permissions; suddenly one day the technical director is not allowed to view users and view permissions, and the technical director role needs to be deleted from the judgment logic in the relevant code; That is, the granularity is based on role as the unit for access control, and the granularity is relatively coarse; if modifications are made, multiple code modifications may occur.

Display roles: In the program, who can access a certain resource is controlled through permissions. Roles aggregate a set of permissions. In this way, assuming which role cannot access a certain resource, you only need to select the permission set represented by the role. Just remove it; there is no need to modify multiple codes; that is, the granularity is based on resources/instances; the granularity is relatively fine.

Please google "RBAC" and "RBAC New Interpretation" to learn about "role-based access control" and "resource-based access control (Resource-Based Access Control)" respectively.

Authorization methods

Shiro supports three methods of authorization:

Programmatically: by writing if/ Else authorization code block is completed:

Subject subject = SecurityUtils.getSubject(); 
if(subject.hasRole(“admin”)) { 
  //有权限 
} else { 
  //无权限 
}

Annotation: Completed by placing the corresponding annotation on the executed Java method:

@RequiresRoles("admin") 
public void hello() { 
  //有权限 
}

No permission will throw the corresponding exception;

JSP/GSP tag: Complete the JSP/GSP page through the corresponding tag:

<shiro:hasRole name="admin"> 
<!— 有权限 —> 
</shiro:hasRole>

The subsequent sections will introduce how to use it in detail.

Authorization

Role-based access control (implicit role)

1. In the ini configuration file Configure the roles owned by the user (shiro-role.ini)

[users] 
zhang=123,role1,role2 
wang=123,role1

The rule is: "Username = Password, Role 1, Role 2", if necessary In the application, to determine whether the user has the corresponding role, the role information needs to be returned in the corresponding Realm. In other words, Shiro is not responsible for maintaining user-role information. It needs to be provided by the application. Shiro only provides the corresponding interface to facilitate verification. We will introduce how to dynamically Get the user role.

2. Test case (com.github.zhangkaitao.shiro.chapter3.RoleTest)

##

@Test 
public void testHasRole() { 
  login("classpath:shiro-role.ini", "zhang", "123"); 
  //判断拥有角色：role1 
  Assert.assertTrue(subject().hasRole("role1")); 
  //判断拥有角色：role1 and role2 
  Assert.assertTrue(subject().hasAllRoles(Arrays.asList("role1", "role2"))); 
  //判断拥有角色：role1 and role2 and !role3 
  boolean[] result = subject().hasRoles(Arrays.asList("role1", "role2", "role3")); 
  Assert.assertEquals(true, result[0]); 
  Assert.assertEquals(true, result[1]); 
  Assert.assertEquals(false, result[2]); 
}

Shiro provides hasRole/hasRole for Determine whether the user has a certain role/certain permissions; however, there is no provision such as hashAnyRole for determining whether the user has certain permissions.

@Test(expected = UnauthorizedException.class) 
public void testCheckRole() { 
  login("classpath:shiro-role.ini", "zhang", "123"); 
  //断言拥有角色：role1 
  subject().checkRole("role1"); 
  //断言拥有角色：role1 and role3 失败抛出异常 
  subject().checkRoles("role1", "role3"); 
}

The difference between checkRole/checkRoles provided by Shiro and hasRole/hasAllRoles is that it will throw UnauthorizedException when it is judged to be false.

到此基于角色的访问控制（即隐式角色）就完成了，这种方式的缺点就是如果很多地方进行了角色判断，但是有一天不需要了那么就需要修改相应代码把所有相关的地方进行删除；这就是粗粒度造成的问题。

基于资源的访问控制（显示角色）

1、在ini配置文件配置用户拥有的角色及角色-权限关系（shiro-permission.ini）

[users] 
zhang=123,role1,role2 
wang=123,role1 
[roles] 
role1=user:create,user:update 
role2=user:create,user:delete

规则：“用户名=密码，角色1，角色2”“角色=权限1，权限2”，即首先根据用户名找到角色，然后根据角色再找到权限；即角色是权限集合；Shiro同样不进行权限的维护，需要我们通过Realm返回相应的权限信息。只需要维护“用户——角色”之间的关系即可。

2、测试用例（com.github.zhangkaitao.shiro.chapter3.PermissionTest）

@Test 
public void testIsPermitted() { 
  login("classpath:shiro-permission.ini", "zhang", "123"); 
  //判断拥有权限：user:create 
  Assert.assertTrue(subject().isPermitted("user:create")); 
  //判断拥有权限：user:update and user:delete 
  Assert.assertTrue(subject().isPermittedAll("user:update", "user:delete")); 
  //判断没有权限：user:view 
  Assert.assertFalse(subject().isPermitted("user:view")); 
}

Shiro提供了isPermitted和isPermittedAll用于判断用户是否拥有某个权限或所有权限，也没有提供如isPermittedAny用于判断拥有某一个权限的接口。

@Test(expected = UnauthorizedExceptionclass) 
public void testCheckPermission () { 
  login("classpath:shiro-permissionini", "zhang", "123"); 
  //断言拥有权限：user:create 
  subject().checkPermission("user:create"); 
  //断言拥有权限：user:delete and user:update 
  subject().checkPermissions("user:delete", "user:update"); 
  //断言拥有权限：user:view 失败抛出异常 
  subject().checkPermissions("user:view"); 
}

但是失败的情况下会抛出UnauthorizedException异常。

到此基于资源的访问控制（显示角色）就完成了，也可以叫基于权限的访问控制，这种方式的一般规则是“资源标识符：操作”，即是资源级别的粒度；这种方式的好处就是如果要修改基本都是一个资源级别的修改，不会对其他模块代码产生影响，粒度小。但是实现起来可能稍微复杂点，需要维护“用户——角色，角色——权限（资源：操作）”之间的关系。

Permission

字符串通配符权限

规则：“资源标识符：操作：对象实例ID” 即对哪个资源的哪个实例可以进行什么操作。其默认支持通配符权限字符串，“:”表示资源/操作/实例的分割；“,”表示操作的分割；“*”表示任意资源/操作/实例。

1、单个资源单个权限

subject().checkPermissions("system:user:update");

用户拥有资源“system:user”的“update”权限。

2、单个资源多个权限

ini配置文件

role41=system:user:update,system:user:delete

然后通过如下代码判断

subject().checkPermissions("system:user:update", "system:user:delete");

用户拥有资源“system:user”的“update”和“delete”权限。如上可以简写成：

ini配置（表示角色4拥有system:user资源的update和delete权限）

role42="system:user:update,delete"

接着可以通过如下代码判断

subject().checkPermissions("system:user:update,delete");

通过“system:user:update,delete”验证"system:user:update, system:user:delete"是没问题的，但是反过来是规则不成立。

3、单个资源全部权限

ini配置

role51="system:user:create,update,delete,view"

然后通过如下代码判断

subject().checkPermissions("system:user:create,delete,update:view");

用户拥有资源“system:user”的“create”、“update”、“delete”和“view”所有权限。如上可以简写成：

ini配置文件（表示角色5拥有system:user的所有权限）

role52=system:user:*

也可以简写为（推荐上边的写法）：

role53=system:user

然后通过如下代码判断

subject().checkPermissions("system:user:*"); 
subject().checkPermissions("system:user");

通过“system:user:*”验证“system:user:create,delete,update:view”可以，但是反过来是不成立的。

4、所有资源全部权限

ini配置

role61=*:view

然后通过如下代码判断

subject().checkPermissions("user:view");

用户拥有所有资源的“view”所有权限。假设判断的权限是“"system:user:view”，那么需要“role5=*:*:view”这样写才行。

5、实例级别的权限

5.1、单个实例单个权限

ini配置

role71=user:view:1

对资源user的1实例拥有view权限。

然后通过如下代码判断

subject().checkPermissions("user:view:1");

5.2、单个实例多个权限

ini配置

role72="user:update,delete:1"

对资源user的1实例拥有update、delete权限。

然后通过如下代码判断

subject().checkPermissions("user:delete,update:1"); 
subject().checkPermissions("user:update:1", "user:delete:1");

5.3、单个实例所有权限

ini配置

role73=user:*:1

对资源user的1实例拥有所有权限。

然后通过如下代码判断

subject().checkPermissions("user:update:1", "user:delete:1", "user:view:1");

5.4、所有实例单个权限

ini配置

role74=user:auth:*

对资源user的1实例拥有所有权限。

然后通过如下代码判断

subject().checkPermissions("user:auth:1", "user:auth:2");

5.5、所有实例所有权限

ini配置

role75=user:*:*

对资源user的1实例拥有所有权限。

然后通过如下代码判断

subject().checkPermissions("user:view:1", "user:auth:2");

6、Shiro对权限字符串缺失部分的处理

如“user:view”等价于“user:view:*”；而“organization”等价于“organization:*”或者“organization:*:*”。可以这么理解，这种方式实现了前缀匹配。

另外如“user:*”可以匹配如“user:delete”、“user:delete”可以匹配如“user:delete:1”、“user:*:1”可以匹配如“user:view:1”、“user”可以匹配“user:view”或“user:view:1”等。即*可以匹配所有，不加*可以进行前缀匹配；但是如“*:view”不能匹配“system:user:view”，需要使用“*:*:view”，即后缀匹配必须指定前缀（多个冒号就需要多个*来匹配）。

7、WildcardPermission

如下两种方式是等价的：

subject().checkPermission("menu:view:1"); 
subject().checkPermission(new WildcardPermission("menu:view:1"));

因此没什么必要的话使用字符串更方便。

8、性能问题

通配符匹配方式比字符串相等匹配来说是更复杂的，因此需要花费更长时间，但是一般系统的权限不会太多，且可以配合缓存来提供其性能，如果这样性能还达不到要求我们可以实现位操作算法实现性能更好的权限匹配。另外实例级别的权限验证如果数据量太大也不建议使用，可能造成查询权限及匹配变慢。可以考虑比如在sql查询时加上权限字符串之类的方式在查询时就完成了权限匹配。

授权流程

流程如下：

1、首先调用Subject.isPermitted*/hasRole*接口，其会委托给SecurityManager，而SecurityManager接着会委托给Authorizer；
2、Authorizer是真正的授权者，如果我们调用如isPermitted(“user:view”)，其首先会通过PermissionResolver把字符串转换成相应的Permission实例；
3、在进行授权之前，其会调用相应的Realm获取Subject相应的角色/权限用于匹配传入的角色/权限；
4、Authorizer会判断Realm的角色/权限是否和传入的匹配，如果有多个Realm，会委托给ModularRealmAuthorizer进行循环判断，如果匹配如isPermitted*/hasRole*会返回true，否则返回false表示授权失败。

ModularRealmAuthorizer进行多Realm匹配流程：

1、首先检查相应的Realm是否实现了实现了Authorizer；
2、如果实现了Authorizer，那么接着调用其相应的isPermitted*/hasRole*接口进行匹配；
3、如果有一个Realm匹配那么将返回true，否则返回false。

如果Realm进行授权的话，应该继承AuthorizingRealm，其流程是：

1.1、如果调用hasRole*，则直接获取AuthorizationInfo.getRoles()与传入的角色比较即可；
1.2、首先如果调用如isPermitted(“user:view”)，首先通过PermissionResolver将权限字符串转换成相应的Permission实例，默认使用WildcardPermissionResolver，即转换为通配符的WildcardPermission；

2、通过AuthorizationInfo.getObjectPermissions()得到Permission实例集合；通过AuthorizationInfo. getStringPermissions()得到字符串集合并通过PermissionResolver解析为Permission实例；然后获取用户的角色，并通过RolePermissionResolver解析角色对应的权限集合（默认没有实现，可以自己提供）；

3、接着调用Permission. implies(Permission p)逐个与传入的权限比较，如果有匹配的则返回true，否则false。

Authorizer、PermissionResolver及RolePermissionResolver

Authorizer的职责是进行授权（访问控制），是Shiro API中授权核心的入口点，其提供了相应的角色/权限判断接口，具体请参考其Javadoc。SecurityManager继承了Authorizer接口，且提供了ModularRealmAuthorizer用于多Realm时的授权匹配。PermissionResolver用于解析权限字符串到Permission实例，而RolePermissionResolver用于根据角色解析相应的权限集合。

我们可以通过如下ini配置更改Authorizer实现：

authorizer=org.apache.shiro.authz.ModularRealmAuthorizer 
securityManager.authorizer=$authorizer

对于ModularRealmAuthorizer，相应的AuthorizingSecurityManager会在初始化完成后自动将相应的realm设置进去，我们也可以通过调用其setRealms()方法进行设置。对于实现自己的authorizer可以参考ModularRealmAuthorizer实现即可，在此就不提供示例了。

设置ModularRealmAuthorizer的permissionResolver，其会自动设置到相应的Realm上（其实现了PermissionResolverAware接口），如：

permissionResolver=org.apache.shiro.authz.permission.WildcardPermissionResolver 
authorizer.permissionResolver=$permissionResolver

设置ModularRealmAuthorizer的rolePermissionResolver，其会自动设置到相应的Realm上（其实现了RolePermissionResolverAware接口），如：

rolePermissionResolver=com.github.zhangkaitao.shiro.chapter3.permission.MyRolePermissionResolver 
authorizer.rolePermissionResolver=$rolePermissionResolver

示例

1、ini配置（shiro-authorizer.ini）

[main] 
#自定义authorizer 
authorizer=org.apache.shiro.authz.ModularRealmAuthorizer 
#自定义permissionResolver 
#permissionResolver=org.apache.shiro.authz.permission.WildcardPermissionResolver 
permissionResolver=com.github.zhangkaitao.shiro.chapter3.permission.BitAndWildPermissionResolver 
authorizer.permissionResolver=$permissionResolver 
#自定义rolePermissionResolver 
rolePermissionResolver=com.github.zhangkaitao.shiro.chapter3.permission.MyRolePermissionResolver 
1authorizer.rolePermissionResolver=$rolePermissionResolver 
 
securityManager.authorizer=$authorizer

#自定义realm 一定要放在securityManager.authorizer赋值之后（因为调用setRealms会将realms设置给authorizer，并给各个Realm设置permissionResolver和rolePermissionResolver） 
realm=com.github.zhangkaitao.shiro.chapter3.realm.MyRealm 
securityManager.realms=$realm

设置securityManager 的realms一定要放到最后，因为在调用SecurityManager.setRealms时会将realms设置给authorizer，并为各个Realm设置permissionResolver和rolePermissionResolver。另外，不能使用IniSecurityManagerFactory创建的IniRealm，因为其初始化顺序的问题可能造成后续的初始化Permission造成影响。

2、定义BitAndWildPermissionResolver及BitPermission

BitPermission用于实现位移方式的权限，如规则是：

权限字符串格式：+资源字符串+权限位+实例ID；以+开头中间通过+分割；权限：0 表示所有权限；1 新增（二进制：0001）、2 修改（二进制：0010）、4 删除（二进制：0100）、8 查看（二进制：1000）；如 +user+10 表示对资源user拥有修改/查看权限。

public class BitPermission implements Permission { 
  private String resourceIdentify; 
  private int permissionBit; 
  private String instanceId; 
  public BitPermission(String permissionString) { 
    String[] array = permissionString.split("\\+"); 
    if(array.length > 1) { 
      resourceIdentify = array[1]; 
    } 
    if(StringUtils.isEmpty(resourceIdentify)) { 
      resourceIdentify = "*"; 
    } 
    if(array.length > 2) { 
      permissionBit = Integer.valueOf(array[2]); 
    } 
    if(array.length > 3) { 
      instanceId = array[3]; 
    } 
    if(StringUtils.isEmpty(instanceId)) { 
      instanceId = "*"; 
    } 
  } 
 
  @Override 
  public boolean implies(Permission p) { 
    if(!(p instanceof BitPermission)) { 
      return false; 
    } 
    BitPermission other = (BitPermission) p; 
    if(!("*".equals(this.resourceIdentify) || this.resourceIdentify.equals(other.resourceIdentify))) { 
      return false; 
    } 
    if(!(this.permissionBit ==0 || (this.permissionBit & other.permissionBit) != 0)) { 
      return false; 
    } 
    if(!("*".equals(this.instanceId) || this.instanceId.equals(other.instanceId))) { 
      return false; 
    } 
    return true; 
  } 
}  
Permission接口提供了boolean implies(Permission p)方法用于判断权限匹配的；
public class BitAndWildPermissionResolver implements PermissionResolver { 
  @Override 
  public Permission resolvePermission(String permissionString) { 
    if(permissionString.startsWith("+")) { 
      return new BitPermission(permissionString); 
    } 
    return new WildcardPermission(permissionString); 
  } 
}

BitAndWildPermissionResolver实现了PermissionResolver接口，并根据权限字符串是否以“+”开头来解析权限字符串为BitPermission或WildcardPermission。

3、定义MyRolePermissionResolver

RolePermissionResolver用于根据角色字符串来解析得到权限集合。

public class MyRolePermissionResolver implements RolePermissionResolver { 
  @Override 
  public Collection<Permission> resolvePermissionsInRole(String roleString) { 
    if("role1".equals(roleString)) { 
      return Arrays.asList((Permission)new WildcardPermission("menu:*")); 
    } 
    return null; 
  } 
}

此处的实现很简单，如果用户拥有role1，那么就返回一个“menu:*”的权限。

4、自定义Realm

public class MyRealm extends AuthorizingRealm { 
  @Override 
  protected AuthorizationInfo doGetAuthorizationInfo(PrincipalCollection principals) { 
    SimpleAuthorizationInfo authorizationInfo = new SimpleAuthorizationInfo(); 
    authorizationInfo.addRole("role1"); 
    authorizationInfo.addRole("role2"); 
    authorizationInfo.addObjectPermission(new BitPermission("+user1+10")); 
    authorizationInfo.addObjectPermission(new WildcardPermission("user1:*")); 
    authorizationInfo.addStringPermission("+user2+10"); 
    authorizationInfo.addStringPermission("user2:*"); 
    return authorizationInfo; 
  } 
  @Override 
  protected AuthenticationInfo doGetAuthenticationInfo(AuthenticationToken token) throws AuthenticationException { 
    //和com.github.zhangkaitao.shiro.chapter2.realm.MyRealm1. getAuthenticationInfo代码一样，省略 
} 
}

此时我们继承AuthorizingRealm而不是实现Realm接口；推荐使用AuthorizingRealm，因为：
AuthenticationInfo doGetAuthenticationInfo(AuthenticationToken token)：表示获取身份验证信息；
AuthorizationInfo doGetAuthorizationInfo(PrincipalCollection principals)：表示根据用户身份获取授权信息。
这种方式的好处是当只需要身份验证时只需要获取身份验证信息而不需要获取授权信息。对于AuthenticationInfo和AuthorizationInfo请参考其Javadoc获取相关接口信息。

另外我们可以使用JdbcRealm，需要做的操作如下：

1、执行sql/ shiro-init-data.sql 插入相关的权限数据；
2、使用shiro-jdbc-authorizer.ini配置文件，需要设置jdbcRealm.permissionsLookupEnabled为true来开启权限查询。

此次还要注意就是不能把我们自定义的如“+user1+10”配置到INI配置文件，即使有IniRealm完成，因为IniRealm在new完成后就会解析这些权限字符串，默认使用了WildcardPermissionResolver完成，即此处是一个设计权限，如果采用生命周期（如使用初始化方法）的方式进行加载就可以解决我们自定义permissionResolver的问题。

5、测试用例

public class AuthorizerTest extends BaseTest { 
 
  @Test 
  public void testIsPermitted() { 
    login("classpath:shiro-authorizer.ini", "zhang", "123"); 
    //判断拥有权限：user:create 
    Assert.assertTrue(subject().isPermitted("user1:update")); 
    Assert.assertTrue(subject().isPermitted("user2:update")); 
    //通过二进制位的方式表示权限 
    Assert.assertTrue(subject().isPermitted("+user1+2"));//新增权限 
    Assert.assertTrue(subject().isPermitted("+user1+8"));//查看权限 
    Assert.assertTrue(subject().isPermitted("+user2+10"));//新增及查看 
 
    Assert.assertFalse(subject().isPermitted("+user1+4"));//没有删除权限 
 
    Assert.assertTrue(subject().isPermitted("menu:view"));//通过MyRolePermissionResolver解析得到的权限 
  } 
}

通过如上步骤可以实现自定义权限验证了。

相关推荐：

shiro源码的详细介绍

实例讲解shiro登录认证和权限控制

关于shiro的源码学习之Session session = getSession()的实例分析

The above is the detailed content of Shiro authorization implementation principle example sharing. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!