!=, ==, !==, === usage summary-JS Tutorial-php.cn

!=, ==, !==, === usage summary

php中世界最好的语言

Release： 2018-04-23 10:15:28

Original

5039 people have browsed it

This time I will bring you a summary of the use of !=, ==, !==, ===, what are the precautions when using !=, ==, !==, === , the following is a practical case, let’s take a look.

var num = 1;  
var str = '1'; 
var test = 1; 
test == num  //true　相同类型　相同值 
test === num //true　相同类型　相同值 
test !== num //false test与num类型相同，其值也相同,　非运算肯定是false 
num == str  //true 　把str转换为数字，检查其是否相等。 
num != str  //false == 的 非运算 
num === str //false 类型不同，直接返回false 
num !== str //true  num 与 str类型不同 意味着其两者不等　非运算自然是true啦

Copy after login

== and != If the types are different, try converting the type first, then perform value comparison, and finally return the value comparison result.

And

=== and !== will only compare their values if they are of the same type.

First of all, == equality is equal, === identity is equal.

==, when the value types on both sides are different, type conversion must be performed first, and then compared.

===, no type conversion is performed, and different types must not be equal.

The following are explained separately:

Let’s talk about === first, this is relatively simple. The following rules are used to determine whether two values are === equal:

1. If the types are different, [not equal]

2. If both are numerical values and are the same A value, then [equal]; (except!) if at least one of them is NaN, then [not equal]. (To determine whether a value is NaN, you can only use isNaN() to determine)

3. If both are strings, and the characters in each position are the same, then [equal ]; otherwise [not equal].

4. If both values are true, or both are false, then [equal].

5. If both values refer to the same object or function, then [equal]; otherwise [not equal].

6. If both values are null, or both are undefined, then [equal].

Let’s talk about ==, according to the following rules:

1. If the two value types are the same, perform === comparison.

2. If two value types are different, they may be equal. Perform type conversion and then compare according to the following rules:

a. If one is null and the other is undefined, then [equal].

b. If one is a string and the other is a numerical value, convert the string into a numerical value and then compare.

c. If any value is true, convert it to 1 and then compare; if any value is false, convert it to 0 and compare.

d. If one is an object and the other is a numerical value or string, convert the object into a value of the basic type and then compare. The object is converted to the base type using its toString or valueOf method. JS core built-in classes will try valueOf before toString; the exception is Date, which uses toString conversion. Non-js core objects, such as

e or any other combination (it’s more troublesome, I don’t quite understand it), are [not equal].

Example:

"1" == true

The types are not equal, true will be converted to the value 1 first, and now it becomes "1" == 1, then convert "1" into 1, compare 1 == 1, equal.

= Assignment operator
== equals
=== strictly equals

Example:
var a = 3;
var b = "3";

a==b returns true
a===b returns false

Because the types of a and b are different

=== Used for strict comparison judgment

var data = ({"val":"7","flag":"true"});
<FONT face=Verdana></FONT>

Copy after login

How to judge the value of flag below?

Because true with double quotes == is presumed to be a string true

If without double quotes==== it is a Boolean value true

This is very important, I have never had it before Figure this out

Writing method 1

if(data.flag=true){…}else{..}

Copy after login

No matter how you write it, it is correct. You cannot get the value of else at all. The reason is this This way of writing is equivalent to

if(true){…}

Copy after login

Writing 2

if(data.flag==true){…}else{..}

Copy after login

There is no such way of writing

##Writing 3

if(data.flag='true'){…}else{..}

Copy after login

is correct no matter how you write it, you can’t get the value of else at all. The reason is that this way of writing is equivalent to the way of writing