What are the differences between uniapp and mpvue?
The difference between uniapp and mpvue: 1. uniapp is a framework that uses Vue.js to develop all front-end applications, while mpvue is a front-end framework that uses Vue.js to develop small programs; 2. uniapp inherits the native Most of the APIs of the mini program and so on.
The operating environment of this tutorial: windows7 system, uni-app2.5.1 version, DELL G3 computer. This method is suitable for all brands of computers.
mpvue (see "https://github.com/Meituan-Dianping/mpvue" for the github address) is a front-end framework that uses Vue.js to develop small programs. The framework is based on the core of Vue.js. mpvue modifies the runtime and compiler implementation of Vue.js so that it can run in the mini program environment, thus introducing a complete set of Vue.js development experience for mini program development.
uni-app is a framework that uses Vue.js to develop all front-end applications. Developers write a set of codes that can be published to iOS, Android, Web (responsive), and various small programs (WeChat/ Alipay/Baidu/Toutiao/QQ/DingTalk/Taobao), Quick App and other platforms.
Comparing uni-app and mpvue to develop small programs?
I have been studying uni-app recently because the company needs to prepare small programs and H5 at the same time. I compared some frameworks online and found that uni-app is more suitable for this kind of development. Here are the native codes and Compare the three frameworks of uni-app and mpvue, and you will know why:
uni-app inherits most of the APIs of the native applet, and the usage is the same as the native applet, so this is basically There will be no incompatibility issues. The API in the mini program can also be used in mpvue, but what should I do if I switch to H5 after using it?
In terms of performance, the official website video of uni-app has been compared. Although I don’t know whether it is true or false, the interactive experience of the page is no different from that of the native applet. Generally speaking, it is When the amount of data loaded on a single page is not large, at this time, the page rendering performance of the native applet and uni-app is basically the same, but mpvue is much worse.
mpvue and uni-app both inherit the syntax of vue, but uni-app is relatively cool. It completely inherits the components of the mini program and the api of the mini program, and is closer to the native mini program. development, so it is still recommended
and the method of converting to H5 is also very simple. When packaging, just package the code into H5 and run it. After comparison, there is no difference between the mini program page and the H5 page. Consistent, here I have to praise uni-app's own pixel unit "upx". For specific upx, you can go to the official website to see
Recommended (free): uni-app development tutorial
The above is the detailed content of What are the differences between uniapp and mpvue?. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

Steps to launch UniApp project preview in WebStorm: Install UniApp Development Tools plugin Connect to device settings WebSocket launch preview

Generally speaking, uni-app is better when complex native functions are needed; MUI is better when simple or highly customized interfaces are needed. In addition, uni-app has: 1. Vue.js/JavaScript support; 2. Rich native components/API; 3. Good ecosystem. The disadvantages are: 1. Performance issues; 2. Difficulty in customizing the interface. MUI has: 1. Material Design support; 2. High flexibility; 3. Extensive component/theme library. The disadvantages are: 1. CSS dependency; 2. Does not provide native components; 3. Small ecosystem.

uniapp development requires the following foundations: front-end technology (HTML, CSS, JavaScript) mobile development knowledge (iOS and Android platforms) Node.js other foundations (version control tools, IDE, mobile development simulator or real machine debugging experience)

UniApp has many conveniences as a cross-platform development framework, but its shortcomings are also obvious: performance is limited by the hybrid development mode, resulting in poor opening speed, page rendering, and interactive response. The ecosystem is imperfect and there are few components and libraries in specific fields, which limits creativity and the realization of complex functions. Compatibility issues on different platforms are prone to style differences and inconsistent API support. The security mechanism of WebView is different from native applications, which may reduce application security. Application releases and updates that support multiple platforms at the same time require multiple compilations and packages, increasing development and maintenance costs.

When choosing between UniApp and native development, you should consider development cost, performance, user experience, and flexibility. The advantages of UniApp are cross-platform development, rapid iteration, easy learning and built-in plug-ins, while native development is superior in performance, stability, native experience and scalability. Weigh the pros and cons based on specific project needs. UniApp is suitable for beginners, and native development is suitable for complex applications that pursue high performance and seamless experience.

In the field of mobile application development, Flutter and uniapp are two cross-platform development frameworks that have attracted much attention. Their emergence enables developers to quickly and efficiently develop applications that support multiple platforms simultaneously. However, despite their similar goals and uses, there are some differences in details and features. Next, we will compare Flutter and uniapp in depth and explore their respective characteristics. Flutte is an open source mobile application development framework launched by Google. Flutter

Recommended component library for uniapp to develop small programs: uni-ui: Officially produced by uni, it provides basic and business components. vant-weapp: Produced by Bytedance, with a simple and beautiful UI design. taro-ui: produced by JD.com and developed based on the Taro framework. fish-design: Produced by Baidu, using Material Design design style. naive-ui: Produced by Youzan, modern UI design, lightweight and easy to customize.
