


Laravel Lecture 3: Global constraints on routing parameters, routing redirection and routing view binding
A previous article has already explained some knowledge about routing, and I will continue to add a few points today.
Global constraints of routing parameters
We already know that we can use the where method to constrain parameters, as follows:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 |
|
About This ID is used by multiple routes and the constraints are the same. Then, we can constrain ids on a global scale. In this way, local routing does not need to be constrained, and the code will not be redundant.
Now, let’s edit the boot method in app/Providers/RouteServiceProvider.php and add a line of code, as follows:
1 2 3 4 5 |
|
Once defined, these rules will be automatically applied to all on the route using this parameter name. But if I want to cancel this restriction or reset parameter rules on individual routes, how should I do it?
To reset, just reset the rules in the where method
1 2 3 4 |
|
The method to cancel the restriction is actually to reset the rules, but use .* in the rules to regularize any characters
1 2 3 4 |
|
Route redirection
We can jump from one route to another address or another route, just use the redirect method of Route
1 2 3 4 5 |
|
The default route redirection uses 302 temporary redirection. If you want to set up a 301 permanent redirection, you need to set the third parameter or use another method, which is permanentRedirect.
1 2 |
|
Routing and view binding
Routing can also be directly bound to the view without going through the controller. Here we need to use the view method, which has three parameters: uri (required parameters), view name (required parameters), and parameters (optional parameters).
1 |
|
Now let’s create a view file named view1 and create a view1.blade.php file in the resources/views directory. The content of the file is as follows:
1 |
|
In addition to using Route::view In addition, you can also use the global view function in the closure of get or other methods to achieve the same effect.
1 2 3 4 |
|
The above is the detailed content of Laravel Lecture 3: Global constraints on routing parameters, routing redirection and routing view binding. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics



The latest versions of Laravel 9 and CodeIgniter 4 provide updated features and improvements. Laravel9 adopts MVC architecture and provides functions such as database migration, authentication and template engine. CodeIgniter4 uses HMVC architecture to provide routing, ORM and caching. In terms of performance, Laravel9's service provider-based design pattern and CodeIgniter4's lightweight framework give it excellent performance. In practical applications, Laravel9 is suitable for complex projects that require flexibility and powerful functions, while CodeIgniter4 is suitable for rapid development and small applications.

Compare the data processing capabilities of Laravel and CodeIgniter: ORM: Laravel uses EloquentORM, which provides class-object relational mapping, while CodeIgniter uses ActiveRecord to represent the database model as a subclass of PHP classes. Query builder: Laravel has a flexible chained query API, while CodeIgniter’s query builder is simpler and array-based. Data validation: Laravel provides a Validator class that supports custom validation rules, while CodeIgniter has less built-in validation functions and requires manual coding of custom rules. Practical case: User registration example shows Lar

Laravel - Artisan Commands - Laravel 5.7 comes with new way of treating and testing new commands. It includes a new feature of testing artisan commands and the demonstration is mentioned below ?

For beginners, CodeIgniter has a gentler learning curve and fewer features, but covers basic needs. Laravel offers a wider feature set but has a slightly steeper learning curve. In terms of performance, both Laravel and CodeIgniter perform well. Laravel has more extensive documentation and active community support, while CodeIgniter is simpler, lightweight, and has strong security features. In the practical case of building a blogging application, Laravel's EloquentORM simplifies data manipulation, while CodeIgniter requires more manual configuration.

When choosing a framework for large projects, Laravel and CodeIgniter each have their own advantages. Laravel is designed for enterprise-level applications, offering modular design, dependency injection, and a powerful feature set. CodeIgniter is a lightweight framework more suitable for small to medium-sized projects, emphasizing speed and ease of use. For large projects with complex requirements and a large number of users, Laravel's power and scalability are more suitable. For simple projects or situations with limited resources, CodeIgniter's lightweight and rapid development capabilities are more ideal.

Microservice architecture uses PHP frameworks (such as Symfony and Laravel) to implement microservices and follows RESTful principles and standard data formats to design APIs. Microservices communicate via message queues, HTTP requests, or gRPC, and use tools such as Prometheus and ELKStack for monitoring and troubleshooting.

For small projects, Laravel is suitable for larger projects that require strong functionality and security. CodeIgniter is suitable for very small projects that require lightweight and ease of use.

Comparing Laravel's Blade and CodeIgniter's Twig template engine, choose based on project needs and personal preferences: Blade is based on MVC syntax, which encourages good code organization and template inheritance. Twig is a third-party library that provides flexible syntax, powerful filters, extended support, and security sandboxing.
