How to make your Laravel return a 'hello world!' in 15 milliseconds
The following tutorial column from laravel will introduce to you how to make your Laravel return a "hello world!" within 15 milliseconds. I hope it will be helpful to friends who need it. help!
First of all, I think that returning the most basic Hello world!
string is the most basic request process among all projects based on Laravel
. In addition, any http
request in the project will carry more time-consuming operations such as business logic and database queries, and the execution time of these logics is uncontrollable and non-comparable. In other words, any other request will not take less time than returning a Hello world!
string. Therefore, by comparing the most basic Hello world
request response time, we can see the impact of different optimizations on the Laravel
framework from startup to end of execution.
Recommended: The latest five Laravel video tutorials
Test parameters
Parameters | Version |
---|---|
Server | 1c processor, 1G memory, 1M bandwidth |
PHP Version | 8.0 |
Process Management | PHP-FPM |
Default configuration response time
It can be seen that after installing PHP
, under the default configuration, a Hello world!
On average it takes about 140ms
. Next, let’s get started!
Round 1: Laravel cache
Laravel
provides us with a very convenient artisan
command to enable the cache function. Effectively reduces the number of How to make your Laravel return a hello world! in 15 milliseconds reads. The php artisan optimize
command includes the php artisan config:cache
and php artisan route:cache
commands, but one more Files
will appear. cache. Execute the following 5 commands in sequence:
root@Aliyun-ECS / # php artisan optimize root@Aliyun-ECS / # php artisan config:cache root@Aliyun-ECS / # php artisan event:cache root@Aliyun-ECS / # php artisan route:cache root@Aliyun-ECS / # php artisan view:cache
Let’s take a look at the response time:
It can be seen that Laravel
’s cache is Basic request, no noticeable impact.
Round 2: Turn on opcache
This time, I decided to use the method with the most obvious speed-up effect: Turn on opcache
Extension. Since I installed php8 using the remi
source, it will be easier for me to install the opcache
extension here. For installation of other versions, please Google it yourself.
root@Aliyun-ECS / # yum install php80-php-opcache
After waiting for the installation to complete, we restart php
, and then check whether the extension has been installed:
root@Aliyun-ECS / # systemctl restart php80-php-fpm root@Aliyun-ECS / # php -i|grep opcache.enable opcache.enable => On => On opcache.enable_cli => On => On opcache.enable_How to make your Laravel return a hello world! in 15 milliseconds_override => Off => Off
ok, the opcache
extension has been enabled Okay, let’s take a look at the response time of Hello world!
:
30ms, which improves the response time by nearly
5 times. Note that the first request will be slower because opcache is writing the cache. After one access, the speed will skyrocket. Are you satisfied here? Look at the title of the article, we need to further increase our efforts!
Round 3: Turn on swoole
swoole Everyone knows that the module loads the application into memory in advance so that when processing the request , reducing the How to make your Laravel return a hello world! in 15 milliseconds reading and loading process, giving
PHP wings. Install the
swoole extension below, please Google for other versions.
root@Aliyun-ECS / # yum install php80-php-pecl-swoole
root@Aliyun-ECS / # systemctl restart php80-php-fpm root@Aliyun-ECS / # php -i|grep swoole.enable swoole.enable_coroutine => On => On swoole.enable_library => On => On swoole.enable_preemptive_scheduler => Off => Off
swoole is an extension in
cli mode,
php-fpm cannot be used. So we need to implement a
http application in
cli mode. But in fact, we don’t need to manually write the
http application ourselves. There are big guys in the community who have already written it. As the saying goes, "Forefathers plant trees, and future generations enjoy the shade." We introduce the
laravel-swoole software package and start a http service. It's very simple.
// 引入软件包 root@Aliyun-ECS / # composer require swooletw/laravel-swoole // 发布配置文件 root@Aliyun-ECS / # php artisan vendor:publish --tag=laravel-swoole
swoole_http and
swoole_websocket in the
config directory of the project. A basic
Hello world! test, no need to modify the default configuration, we only add
SWOOLE_HTTP_HOST=0.0.0.0 and ## in the
.env How to make your Laravel return a hello world! in 15 milliseconds of the project #SWOOLE_HTTP_PORT=2020
, which means to start a http
listening program on the 2020
port. 0.0.0.0
means any IP can be accessed remotely. <div class="code" style="position:relative; padding:0px; margin:0px;"><pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false">// .env
SWOOLE_HTTP_HOST=0.0.0.0
SWOOLE_HTTP_PORT=2020</pre><div class="contentsignin">Copy after login</div></div>
The basic configuration modification is completed, we start the
application of laravel-swoole
: <div class="code" style="position:relative; padding:0px; margin:0px;"><pre class="brush:php;toolbar:false">root@Aliyun-ECS / # php artisan swoole:http start
Starting swoole http server...Swoole http server started: <http:></http:></pre><div class="contentsignin">Copy after login</div></div>
At this time we visit
Port, you can test the application expanded using swoole
. Let’s look at the response time of the request:
Good guy! Directly do it within
. The first time here takes a long time because opcache
is turned on and the cache will be written. But the opcache
write cache here is much faster than the one in Round 2
that only opens the opache
extension. This is all the result of swoole
. <h1>
<span class="header-link octicon octicon-link"></span>Conclusion</h1>
<p>I tested it again, only enabling the <code>swoole
extension without enabling the opcache
, and found that the response time was the same as two The response time is the same for both extensions enabled. In other words, after having swoole
, opcache
will be useless? I have to ask the big guys for advice on this. Here is a simple comparison:
Through practical comparison, it is found that enabling the opcache
and swoole
extensions at the same time has the fastest response time. Fast.
Other questions
- PHP-FPM process management, why is the master process created? Unscientific
Thanks
Thanks @Hesunfly for the answer. Sometimes the extended information viewed using the
php -i
mode on the command line is inconsistent with the extended information viewed usingphpinfo()
on the page. Here is a quote from @Hesunfly's original words:
"Some distributions do share the configurations ofcli
andfpm
, such as for mac The php installed by brew only has onephp.ini
. But when I install it under centos and ubuntu, I usually distinguish betweencli
andfpm
."
The above is the detailed content of How to make your Laravel return a 'hello world!' in 15 milliseconds. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics



The latest versions of Laravel 9 and CodeIgniter 4 provide updated features and improvements. Laravel9 adopts MVC architecture and provides functions such as database migration, authentication and template engine. CodeIgniter4 uses HMVC architecture to provide routing, ORM and caching. In terms of performance, Laravel9's service provider-based design pattern and CodeIgniter4's lightweight framework give it excellent performance. In practical applications, Laravel9 is suitable for complex projects that require flexibility and powerful functions, while CodeIgniter4 is suitable for rapid development and small applications.

Compare the data processing capabilities of Laravel and CodeIgniter: ORM: Laravel uses EloquentORM, which provides class-object relational mapping, while CodeIgniter uses ActiveRecord to represent the database model as a subclass of PHP classes. Query builder: Laravel has a flexible chained query API, while CodeIgniter’s query builder is simpler and array-based. Data validation: Laravel provides a Validator class that supports custom validation rules, while CodeIgniter has less built-in validation functions and requires manual coding of custom rules. Practical case: User registration example shows Lar

For beginners, CodeIgniter has a gentler learning curve and fewer features, but covers basic needs. Laravel offers a wider feature set but has a slightly steeper learning curve. In terms of performance, both Laravel and CodeIgniter perform well. Laravel has more extensive documentation and active community support, while CodeIgniter is simpler, lightweight, and has strong security features. In the practical case of building a blogging application, Laravel's EloquentORM simplifies data manipulation, while CodeIgniter requires more manual configuration.

Laravel - Artisan Commands - Laravel 5.7 comes with new way of treating and testing new commands. It includes a new feature of testing artisan commands and the demonstration is mentioned below ?

When choosing a framework for large projects, Laravel and CodeIgniter each have their own advantages. Laravel is designed for enterprise-level applications, offering modular design, dependency injection, and a powerful feature set. CodeIgniter is a lightweight framework more suitable for small to medium-sized projects, emphasizing speed and ease of use. For large projects with complex requirements and a large number of users, Laravel's power and scalability are more suitable. For simple projects or situations with limited resources, CodeIgniter's lightweight and rapid development capabilities are more ideal.

For small projects, Laravel is suitable for larger projects that require strong functionality and security. CodeIgniter is suitable for very small projects that require lightweight and ease of use.

Comparing Laravel's Blade and CodeIgniter's Twig template engine, choose based on project needs and personal preferences: Blade is based on MVC syntax, which encourages good code organization and template inheritance. Twig is a third-party library that provides flexible syntax, powerful filters, extended support, and security sandboxing.

Laravel - Artisan Console - Laravel framework provides three primary tools for interaction through command-line namely: Artisan, Ticker and REPL. This chapter explains about Artisan in detail.
