Home > Web Front-end > Vue.js > Let's talk about how to avoid empty classes when dynamically binding classes in Vue!

Let's talk about how to avoid empty classes when dynamically binding classes in Vue!

青灯夜游
Release: 2022-09-21 20:27:19
forward
1587 people have browsed it

Vue How to avoid empty classes in dynamic binding classes? The following article will introduce to you how to avoid empty classes when dynamically binding classes in Vue. I hope it will be helpful to you!

Let's talk about how to avoid empty classes when dynamically binding classes in Vue!

【Related recommendation: vuejs video tutorial

Passing an empty string may cause the class in the DOM output to be null. In the ternary operator, we can return "null", which ensures that there is no empty class in the DOM?

<!-- ❌ -->
<div :class="isBold ? &#39;bold&#39; : &#39;&#39;">
<!-- <div class> -->

<!-- ✅ -->
<div :class="isBold ? &#39;bold&#39; : null">
<!-- <div> --
Copy after login

Option 1: Use an empty string''

We use the ternary operator to conditionally set the appropriate class based on whether isBold is true or falsy. In the following example, if isBold is true, the class is set to bold. If it is virtual value, it will return an empty string ''.

html

<div :class="isBold ? &#39;bold&#39; : &#39;&#39;"></div>
Copy after login

js

data() {
  return {
    isBold: false
  }
}
Copy after login
Copy after login

The final rendering looks like:

<div class></div>
<!-- ? 啊! 空的class -->
Copy after login

If isBold is true and will be rendered as:

<div class="bold"></div>
Copy after login
Copy after login

Option 2: Use null

Next, let’s see if we give What happens when a class is assigned a value of null.

html

<div :class="isBold ? &#39;bold&#39; : null"></div>
Copy after login

js

data() {
  return {
    isBold: false
  }
}
Copy after login
Copy after login

The final rendering looks like:

<div></div>
<!-- ✅ Nice, 没有空的 class -->
Copy after login

If isBold is true and will be rendered as:

<div class="bold"></div>
Copy after login
Copy after login

Solution 3: Use undefined

By the way, undefined also works fine Working?

<div :class="isBold ? &#39;bold&#39; : undefined"></div>
Copy after login
<div></div>
<!-- ✅ Nice, no empty class -->
Copy after login

Virtual Values

The following are virtual values ​​in JS. Therefore, if isBold is any of these values, it will return the false case of the ternary operator.

false
undefined
null
NaN
0
"" or '' or `` (empty string)
Copy after login

Refactoring using object syntax

For the above example, it would be better to use object syntax:

<div :class="{ bold: isBold }"></div>
Copy after login

A better scenario for using the ternary operator is Set up multiple classes.

<div :class="isActive ? &#39;underline bold&#39; : null"></div>
Copy after login

Using && Setting Class

Let’s look at another scenario to see if it works.

<div :class="isBold && &#39;bold&#39;"></div>
Copy after login
Copy after login
Copy after login

&& is not only a logical operator, it can actually produce a value. Therefore, if isBold is true, bold is returned. However, if isBold is a virtual value, the value of isBold is returned.

Emphasis on the last point - it will return the value of isBold. So depending on what the value of isBold is, our original problem of having an empty class still exists. Let's look at some examples.

Example A: isBold is equal to false

<div :class="isBold && &#39;bold&#39;"></div>
Copy after login
Copy after login
Copy after login

This will still render the empty class?

<div class></div>
Copy after login

Example B: isBold is equal to null

<div :class="isBold && &#39;bold&#39;"></div>
Copy after login
Copy after login
Copy after login

Since isBold is null, the empty class disappears?.

<div></div>
Copy after login

&&That's right - actually, it just does its job. It's just that we need a specific return value. In other respects, we cannot render empty classes, we must pass null or undefined. Any other false values ​​other than these two will not work. Since this is easy to miss, I would prefer the more explicit ternary operator, or just object syntax?

Is the empty class attribute wrong?

I tried using W3C Markup Validation Service to check, and both syntaxes indeed passed.

<!-- Pass -->
<div class>...</div>

<!-- Pass -->
<div>...</div>
Copy after login

Drilling down into the HTML Standard: HTML Standard: Empty attribute syntax, it doesn't seem to allow empty attributes.

But...

But this validity does not apply to id. Because empty id is considered invalid.

<!-- Fail -->
<div id>...</div>

<!-- Fail -->
<div id="">...</div>

<!-- Pass -->
<div id="name">...</div>
Copy after login
❌ Error: ID cannot be an empty string.

Summary

Since empty classes are considered valid and the spec doesn't object to it, it's all your choice. It's your codebase and you decide what to do with it. If you want to keep your HTML output clean, you can pass null to the Vue ternary operator. If it doesn't matter to you, forget it. There is no right answer here, it all depends on your preference?

(Learning video sharing: web front-end development, Basic programming video)

The above is the detailed content of Let's talk about how to avoid empty classes when dynamically binding classes in Vue!. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Related labels:
source:segmentfault.com
Statement of this Website
The content of this article is voluntarily contributed by netizens, and the copyright belongs to the original author. This site does not assume corresponding legal responsibility. If you find any content suspected of plagiarism or infringement, please contact admin@php.cn
Popular Tutorials
More>
Latest Downloads
More>
Web Effects
Website Source Code
Website Materials
Front End Template