Performance competition between laravel9 and laravels!
Foreword: I recently wanted to use swoole to try websocket. I just installed and tested the performance of laravel and swoole. I don’t know if the performance of laravel9 is optimized well. The final stress test results are similar to those of laravels~
Laradock installed swoole
Encountered problems after hands-on operation:
Because of the original PHP The version is 7.4. You need to modify the .env file and switch the version to 8.0 and above (Laravels requires php to be 8.1 when installed, so it is still set to version 8.1):
Execute again The build command succeeds. [Recommendation: laravel video tutorial]
Verification results:
Configure laravels http server
1. Install laravel project
There are many tutorials, here you can refer to: Laravel 9 Chinese Document - Installation
Based on the environment where docker is installed
curl -s "https://laravel.build/laravel9" | bashCopy
2. Install laravels
composer require hhxsv5/laravel-sCopy
3. Publish laravels configuration
php artisan laravels publishCopy
4. Configuring the site
Instructions: The project codes corresponding to the site are/var/www/laravel9/public
(1) Configure laravels http server
upstream laravels { # Connect IP:Port server workspace:5200 weight=5 max_fails=3 fail_timeout=30s; keepalive 16; } server { listen 80; server_name swoole.test; root /var/www/laravel9/public; index index.php index.html index.htm; # Nginx 处理静态资源,LaravelS 处理动态资源 location / { try_files $uri @laravels; } location @laravels { proxy_http_version 1.1; proxy_set_header Connection ""; proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr; proxy_set_header X-Real-PORT $remote_port; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for; proxy_set_header Host $http_host; proxy_set_header Scheme $scheme; proxy_set_header Server-Protocol $server_protocol; proxy_set_header Server-Name $server_name; proxy_set_header Server-Addr $server_addr; proxy_set_header Server-Port $server_port; proxy_pass http://laravels; } error_log /var/log/nginx/swoole_test_error.log; access_log /var/log/nginx/swoole_test_access.log; }
Note: laravels project You need to add the following configuration to the .env file under the laravel9 project:
LARAVELS_LISTEN_IP=workspace LARAVELS_DAEMONIZE=trueCopy
(2) Configure the normal laravel project site
server { listen 80; listen [::]:80; # For https # listen 443 ssl; # listen [::]:443 ssl ipv6only=on; # ssl_certificate /etc/nginx/ssl/default.crt; # ssl_certificate_key /etc/nginx/ssl/default.key; server_name laravel.test; root /var/www/laravel9/public; index index.php index.html index.htm; location / { try_files $uri $uri/ /index.php$is_args$args; } location ~ \.php$ { try_files $uri /index.php =404; fastcgi_pass php-upstream; fastcgi_index index.php; fastcgi_buffers 16 16k; fastcgi_buffer_size 32k; fastcgi_param SCRIPT_FILENAME $document_root$fastcgi_script_name; #fixes timeouts fastcgi_read_timeout 600; include fastcgi_params; } location ~ /\.ht { deny all; } location /.well-known/acme-challenge/ { root /var/www/letsencrypt/; log_not_found off; } error_log /var/log/nginx/laravel_error.log; access_log /var/log/nginx/laravel_access.log; }
(3) Local host configuration
127.0.0.1 swoole.test127.0.0.1 laravel.testCopy
(4) Rebuild the container
docker-compose stop docker-compose build workspace nginx docker-compose up -d redis mysql nginx workspaceCopy
(5) Enter the workspace container and start laravels
Enter container command:
docker exec -it d4940755a928 /bin/bashCopy
AB performance test results
- Core Concern is the number of requests per second (Requests per second)
- They are all based on the Laradock environment
- Share the same project code
1. The total number of requests is 100, The number of concurrency is 10 (swoole on the left, laravel9 on the right):
2. The total number of requests is 1000, and the number of concurrency is 20 (swoole on the left, laravel9 on the right) );
The gap is not obvious, and sometimes the results of laravel9 are even better. Is such a result considered an overturn~
Original address: https://learnku.com /articles/73575
The above is the detailed content of Performance competition between laravel9 and laravels!. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics

PHP and Flutter are popular technologies for mobile development. Flutter excels in cross-platform capabilities, performance and user interface, and is suitable for applications that require high performance, cross-platform and customized UI. PHP is suitable for server-side applications with lower performance and not cross-platform.

Database operations in PHP are simplified using ORM, which maps objects into relational databases. EloquentORM in Laravel allows you to interact with the database using object-oriented syntax. You can use ORM by defining model classes, using Eloquent methods, or building a blog system in practice.

Laravel - Artisan Commands - Laravel 5.7 comes with new way of treating and testing new commands. It includes a new feature of testing artisan commands and the demonstration is mentioned below ?

PHP unit testing tool analysis: PHPUnit: suitable for large projects, provides comprehensive functionality and is easy to install, but may be verbose and slow. PHPUnitWrapper: suitable for small projects, easy to use, optimized for Lumen/Laravel, but has limited functionality, does not provide code coverage analysis, and has limited community support.

The latest versions of Laravel 9 and CodeIgniter 4 provide updated features and improvements. Laravel9 adopts MVC architecture and provides functions such as database migration, authentication and template engine. CodeIgniter4 uses HMVC architecture to provide routing, ORM and caching. In terms of performance, Laravel9's service provider-based design pattern and CodeIgniter4's lightweight framework give it excellent performance. In practical applications, Laravel9 is suitable for complex projects that require flexibility and powerful functions, while CodeIgniter4 is suitable for rapid development and small applications.

Compare the data processing capabilities of Laravel and CodeIgniter: ORM: Laravel uses EloquentORM, which provides class-object relational mapping, while CodeIgniter uses ActiveRecord to represent the database model as a subclass of PHP classes. Query builder: Laravel has a flexible chained query API, while CodeIgniter’s query builder is simpler and array-based. Data validation: Laravel provides a Validator class that supports custom validation rules, while CodeIgniter has less built-in validation functions and requires manual coding of custom rules. Practical case: User registration example shows Lar

PHP Unit and Integration Testing Guide Unit Testing: Focus on a single unit of code or function and use PHPUnit to create test case classes for verification. Integration testing: Pay attention to how multiple code units work together, and use PHPUnit's setUp() and tearDown() methods to set up and clean up the test environment. Practical case: Use PHPUnit to perform unit and integration testing in Laravel applications, including creating databases, starting servers, and writing test code.

When choosing a framework for large projects, Laravel and CodeIgniter each have their own advantages. Laravel is designed for enterprise-level applications, offering modular design, dependency injection, and a powerful feature set. CodeIgniter is a lightweight framework more suitable for small to medium-sized projects, emphasizing speed and ease of use. For large projects with complex requirements and a large number of users, Laravel's power and scalability are more suitable. For simple projects or situations with limited resources, CodeIgniter's lightweight and rapid development capabilities are more ideal.
