PHP框架性能测试报告_PHP
作为一个PHP开发者，而且是初创企业团队的技术开发者，选择开发框架是个很艰难的事情。
用ThinkPHP的话，招聘一个刚从培训机构出来的开发者就可以上手了，但是性能和后期代码解耦是个让人头疼的事情。不过很多第三方功能不需要自己写，众多大牛已经给铺好路了。
用Laravel的话，传说写起来很爽扩展性也够，但是学习成本有点高，总不能给初级开发者半个月的时间去学习框架吧。而且据说江湖人士透漏，Laravel性能不怎么样，文档也并不是特别丰富。
用Yii的话，语法有点啰嗦，前后端代码分离有点小麻烦，不过性能是非常好的，而且已经有众多国内大公司在使用了，出现意外可以快速的找到大牛答疑解惑。
不如做个简单的性能评测，选个性能出色的总不会出错
性能测试
测试时间： 2016年05月06日
测试工具： siege (因为MAC系统的ab总是会出现 pr_socket_recv: Connection reset by peer (54) 的错误，所以选择了siege)
测试机器： MacPro Core i5 处理器/8GB内存/256GB SSD闪存
测试环境： Apache PHP5.6
框架版本： ThinkPHP 3.2.3 Laravel 5.2 Yii2.0.5
测试原则： 每次测试循环5次，取中等数据
补充说明：所有项目都是让在子目录中
结果说明
Transactions: 2119 hits 处理请求总数量 Availability: 96.85 % 可用性 Elapsed time: 9.74 secs 运行时间 Data transferred: 1.31 MB 数据传输量 Response time: 0.60 secs 响应时间 Transaction rate: 217.56 trans/sec 每秒处理效率 Throughput: 0.13 MB/sec 每秒处理数据 Concurrency: 130.28 并发 Successful transactions: 2162 成功的请求 Failed transactions: 69 失败的请求 Longest transaction: 2.85 最长的单个请求 Shortest transaction: 0.01 最短的单个请求
开始测试
增加一个控制器，并在控制器中输入10000次HelloWorld
并发50循环10次：
首先向我们走来的是ThinkPHP，看上去还行
Transactions: 500 hits Availability: 100.00 % Elapsed time: 2.81 secs Data transferred: 52.45 MB Response time: 0.26 secs Transaction rate: 177.94 trans/sec Throughput: 18.67 MB/sec Concurrency: 47.10 Successful transactions: 500 Failed transactions: 0 Longest transaction: 0.48 Shortest transaction: 0.03
然后是Laravle，嗯，略微有些失望
Transactions: 500 hits Availability: 100.00 % Elapsed time: 13.33 secs Data transferred: 52.45 MB Response time: 1.27 secs Transaction rate: 37.51 trans/sec Throughput: 3.93 MB/sec Concurrency: 47.55 Successful transactions: 500 Failed transactions: 0 Longest transaction: 3.64 Shortest transaction: 0.07
最后赛前比较看好的Yii
Transactions: 500 hits Availability: 100.00 % Elapsed time: 4.84 secs Data transferred: 52.45 MB Response time: 0.46 secs Transaction rate: 103.31 trans/sec Throughput: 10.84 MB/sec Concurrency: 47.65 Successful transactions: 500 Failed transactions: 0 Longest transaction: 0.88 Shortest transaction: 0.04
并发200循环10次：
首先是ThinkPHP
Transactions: 1977 hits Availability: 98.85 % Elapsed time: 10.03 secs Data transferred: 207.40 MB Response time: 0.95 secs Transaction rate: 197.11 trans/sec Throughput: 20.68 MB/sec Concurrency: 187.68 Successful transactions: 1977 Failed transactions: 23 Longest transaction: 1.22 Shortest transaction: 0.02
然后是Laravel
Transactions: 1890 hits Availability: 94.50 % Elapsed time: 51.85 secs Data transferred: 198.27 MB Response time: 4.88 secs Transaction rate: 36.45 trans/sec Throughput: 3.82 MB/sec Concurrency: 178.00 Successful transactions: 1890 Failed transactions: 110 Longest transaction: 26.01 Shortest transaction: 0.07
最后是Yii
Transactions: 1996 hits Availability: 99.80 % Elapsed time: 18.95 secs Data transferred: 209.39 MB Response time: 1.79 secs Transaction rate: 105.33 trans/sec Throughput: 11.05 MB/sec Concurrency: 188.57 Successful transactions: 1996 Failed transactions: 4 Longest transaction: 3.29 Shortest transaction: 0.10
没想到在没有优化的情况下，ThinkPHP的速度是最快的，Yii略微多一些，Laravel步履蹒跚的跑完了测试。结果是有些出人意料的，不过上述的测试只代表了开发环境，下面会对框架进行优化，模拟线上环境。
优化框架
ThinkPHP：
APP_DEBUG改为false
Laravel：
APP_DEBUG改为false php artisan route:cache php artisan optimize php artisan config:cache composer dumpautoload -o
Yii：
YII_DEBUG改为false
composer dumpautoload -o
并发200循环10次：
ThinkPHP
Transactions: 1655 hits Availability: 82.75 % Elapsed time: 8.21 secs Data transferred: 173.62 MB Response time: 0.69 secs Transaction rate: 201.58 trans/sec Throughput: 21.15 MB/sec Concurrency: 139.29 Successful transactions: 1655 Failed transactions: 345 Longest transaction: 7.83 Shortest transaction: 0.00
Laravel:
Transactions: 1520 hits Availability: 76.00 % Elapsed time: 34.95 secs Data transferred: 159.45 MB Response time: 3.15 secs Transaction rate: 43.49 trans/sec Throughput: 4.56 MB/sec Concurrency: 136.84 Successful transactions: 1520 Failed transactions: 480 Longest transaction: 19.18 Shortest transaction: 0.00
Yii:
Transactions: 1704 hits Availability: 85.20 % Elapsed time: 15.16 secs Data transferred: 178.76 MB Response time: 1.46 secs Transaction rate: 112.40 trans/sec Throughput: 11.79 MB/sec Concurrency: 164.21 Successful transactions: 1704 Failed transactions: 296 Longest transaction: 9.04 Shortest transaction: 0.00
比较奇怪的一点，当框架关掉调试模式后都出现了较多失败的情况。不过明显的看到，Laravel进行简单的优化后，性能大大的提升了，但还是低于其他两个框架。
结论
在测试的过程中，其他我的心情是沮丧的，感觉自己的三观世界已经崩塌了，崩塌至渣。
ThinkPHP的性能比Yii高出一倍，比Laravel高出近四倍
Yii的性能比较中庸，但是在测试中会明显发现请求失败的情况比其他两个框架要少
Laravel依旧优雅，不过性能堪忧，用网友的话形容比较好 学之者生用之者死
最后
我的项目最后使用了自建框架进行开发，得益于composer的强大，开发的过程非常顺利，最后附上自有框架在200并发10次循环的数据，框架开源但是更新比较忙，欢迎在github上搜索PPPHP，和我一起搭建框架。
Transactions: 1672 hits Availability: 83.60 % Elapsed time: 6.18 secs Data transferred: 175.40 MB Response time: 0.57 secs Transaction rate: 270.55 trans/sec Throughput: 28.38 MB/sec Concurrency: 153.16 Successful transactions: 1672 Failed transactions: 328 Longest transaction: 4.57 Shortest transaction: 0.01
Hot AI Tools
Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos
AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.
Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free
Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover
AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.
Hot Article
Hot Tools
Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor
SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use
Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment
Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools
SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)
Hot Topics
Comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of PHP frameworks: Which one is better?
Jun 04, 2024 pm 03:36 PM
The choice of PHP framework depends on project needs and developer skills: Laravel: rich in features and active community, but has a steep learning curve and high performance overhead. CodeIgniter: lightweight and easy to extend, but has limited functionality and less documentation. Symfony: Modular, strong community, but complex, performance issues. ZendFramework: enterprise-grade, stable and reliable, but bulky and expensive to license. Slim: micro-framework, fast, but with limited functionality and a steep learning curve.
Performance differences of PHP frameworks in different development environments
Jun 05, 2024 pm 08:57 PM
There are differences in the performance of PHP frameworks in different development environments. Development environments (such as local Apache servers) suffer from lower framework performance due to factors such as lower local server performance and debugging tools. In contrast, a production environment (such as a fully functional production server) with more powerful servers and optimized configurations allows the framework to perform significantly better.
PHP Frameworks and Microservices: Cloud Native Deployment and Containerization
Jun 04, 2024 pm 12:48 PM
Benefits of combining PHP framework with microservices: Scalability: Easily extend the application, add new features or handle more load. Flexibility: Microservices are deployed and maintained independently, making it easier to make changes and updates. High availability: The failure of one microservice does not affect other parts, ensuring higher availability. Practical case: Deploying microservices using Laravel and Kubernetes Steps: Create a Laravel project. Define microservice controllers. Create Dockerfile. Create a Kubernetes manifest. Deploy microservices. Test microservices.
Integration of PHP frameworks with DevOps: the future of automation and agility
Jun 05, 2024 pm 09:18 PM
Integrating PHP frameworks with DevOps can improve efficiency and agility: automate tedious tasks, free up personnel to focus on strategic tasks, shorten release cycles, accelerate time to market, improve code quality, reduce errors, enhance cross-functional team collaboration, and break down development and operations silos
PHP Frameworks and Artificial Intelligence: A Developer's Guide
Jun 04, 2024 pm 12:47 PM
Use a PHP framework to integrate artificial intelligence (AI) to simplify the integration of AI in web applications. Recommended framework: Laravel: lightweight, efficient, and powerful. CodeIgniter: Simple and easy to use, suitable for small applications. ZendFramework: Enterprise-level framework with complete functions. AI integration method: Machine learning model: perform specific tasks. AIAPI: Provides pre-built functionality. AI library: handles AI tasks.
The best PHP framework for microservice architecture: performance and efficiency
Jun 03, 2024 pm 08:27 PM
Best PHP Microservices Framework: Symfony: Flexibility, performance and scalability, providing a suite of components for building microservices. Laravel: focuses on efficiency and testability, provides a clean API interface, and supports stateless services. Slim: minimalist, fast, provides a simple routing system and optional midbody builder, suitable for building high-performance APIs.
The application potential of artificial intelligence in PHP framework
Jun 03, 2024 am 11:01 AM
The application potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in PHP framework includes: Natural Language Processing (NLP): for analyzing text, identifying emotions and generating summaries. Image processing: used to identify image objects, face detection and resizing. Machine learning: for prediction, classification and clustering. Practical cases: chatbots, personalized recommendations, fraud detection. Integrating AI can enhance website or application functionality, providing powerful new features.
How does the performance comparison of different PHP frameworks affect application selection?
Jun 06, 2024 am 11:16 AM
The performance of different PHP frameworks significantly affects application selection. Benchmark tests show the performance of Slim, Laravel, Symfony and CodeIgniter as follows: Slim: lightweight design, with the fastest processing speed Laravel: suitable for large applications, processing complex queries Strong performance Symfony: enterprise-level framework, excellent performance in handling complex business logic CodeIgniter: lightweight framework, suitable for small applications Factors such as application size, processing power, code complexity and scalability should be taken into consideration to choose the most suitable For example, an e-commerce website may need a high-performance framework like Laravel, while a small blog may be more suitable for Slim.
