GPT-4 was asked to be banned due to complaints: OpenAI does not meet any of the artificial intelligence standards issued by the FTC

A few days ago, Musk, Yoshua Bengio and others jointly signed an open letter calling on all AI laboratories to immediately suspend the training of AI models more powerful than GPT-4. Now, someone wants to stop the released GPT-4.

This time it was the non-profit organization Center for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Policy (CAIDP) that stopped GPT-4. CAIDP requested the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate OpenAI and prohibit the company from further releasing GPT-4.

File address: https://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/CAIDP-FTC -Complaint-OpenAI-GPT-033023.pdf

CAIDP filed this application with the FTC because they believed that "the consumer product GPT-4 released by OpenAI is biased, Deceptive and posing a risk to privacy and public safety. The model's output cannot be proven or reproduced and is not independently evaluated before deployment."

CAIDP calls for independent oversight and evaluation of all commercial artificial intelligence products in the United States and ensures necessary "safeguards" are in place to protect consumers, businesses, and the commercial market.

Previously, the FTC has announced an artificial intelligence standard that "while promoting accountability, requires the use of artificial intelligence to be transparent, explainable, fair, and "Empirically reasonable", CAIDP stated that "OpenAI's GPT-4 does not meet any of these requirements."

It’s only been two weeks since the release of GPT-4, and people are already deeply divided over this type of powerful AI model. On the one hand, those who want to stop powerful models such as GPT-4 believe that these models will pose greater risks to information security and even human society; on the other hand, some people believe that this is a good time for artificial intelligence to flourish. Accelerated technological progress should be promoted.

Interestingly, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman posted a new tweet: "Stay calm in the center of the storm." This may be his response to the recent series of "suspended GPT-4, etc." A response to the call for “model research”.

In terms of risk, OpenAI said at the time of the release that it had asked external experts to assess the potential risks posed by GPT-4. However, CAIDP made it clear in its filing to the FTC which acts GPT-4 violated.

CAIDP believes that GPT-4 has seriously affected commercial fairness, saying: "The commercial release of GPT-4 violates Section 5 of the FTC Act and the FTC's regulations on the use and advertising of artificial intelligence products. Standards set by enterprises, as well as emerging norms for artificial intelligence governance, etc."

In addition, OpenAI did not disclose any technical details of GPT-4. This is one of the reasons why CAIDP filed an application with the FTC.

CAIDP said: "OpenAI did not disclose details about the architecture, model size, hardware, computing resources, training techniques, dataset construction or training methods, and it is common practice in the research community to document Training data and training technology for large language models, but OpenAI chose not to do these things for GPT-4. In particular, generative artificial intelligence models are not ordinary consumer products, because they may exhibit some abnormal behaviors during use, These behaviors may not have been discovered by the issuing company before."

Complaint details

Specifically, CAIDP targeted GPT-4 and A related model, ChatGPT, points out a range of potential risks.

For example, OpenAI has made it clear in the article "GPT-4 System Card" that GPT-4 may reinforce and reproduce specific biases and worldviews, including against certain marginalized groups. of stereotypes and derogatory associations. CAIDP also cited a blog post from the company OpenAI, which said that a similar large model, ChatGPT, sometimes responded to harmful instructions or exhibited biased behavior.

In the complaint submitted to the FTC, CAIDP stated that "OpenAI released GPT-4 to the public for commercial use despite fully understanding the risks." The complaint also alleges that "the GPT-4 System Card does not provide details about the security checks OpenAI conducted during its testing, nor does it detail any steps OpenAI takes to protect children, which also raises questions about the use of GPT-4 on children." Concerns."

CAIDP also pointed out concerns raised by the European consumer organization BEUC: "If ChatGPT is used for consumer credit or insurance scores, is it possible that it will produce inappropriate results? Fair and biased outcome?" This tweet was also cited in CAIDP's complaint application.

In addition, in terms of network security, ChatGPT can be used for phishing, creating fake texts, or generating malicious code. On the privacy front, CAIDP said there were reports this month that OpenAI displayed private chats to other users.

In another case, an AI researcher described how ChatGPT could take over someone's account, view chat history, and access their bill without them realizing it information. However, OpenAI fixed the vulnerability.

CAIDP also stated that GPT-4 can provide text responses from image inputs, a feature that has a huge impact on personal privacy and personal autonomy, and allows users to convert personal images to linked to detailed personal data. It is understood that OpenAI has suspended the image-to-text function, but it is difficult to say what the actual situation is.

CAIDP believes that the FTC should prohibit OpenAI from further commercial deployment of GPT, require independent evaluation of GPT products before deployment and throughout the GPT AI life cycle, require OpenAI to comply with FTC AI standards, and Establish a publicly accessible incident reporting mechanism for GPT-4, similar to the FTC's mechanism for reporting consumer fraud.

CAIDP also urged the FTC to further publish standard specifications to serve as "basic standards for products in the generative artificial intelligence market area."

AI academic community, a debate

Thousands of people signed a petition in the past two days to suspend the development of GPT-4 follow-up AI large models. Today, CAIDP asked the FTC to investigate OpenAI’s ban Release a new commercial version of GPT-4. In just one or two days, various discussions have exploded, and AI bosses and various experts have come out to respond publicly. There are those who oppose it and those who support it.

In terms of suspending the research and development of GPT-4 follow-up AI large models, Turing Award winner Yoshua Bengio, Tesla CEO (OpenAI co-founder) Elon Musk, New York University Emeritus Professor Gary Marcus and UC Berkeley Professor Stuart Russell are all in favor. They have signed the open letter to suspend giant AI experiments. Notably, Marc Rotenberg, president and founder of CAIDP, also signed the open letter.

Open letter address: https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/

#However, Yann LeCun, who has been criticizing ChatGPT, publicly stated that he would not sign the open letter and disagreed with the content of the open letter.

Thomas G. Dietterich, professor emeritus at Oregon State University, said on Twitter, "I didn't sign it either. This letter is filled with a bunch of scary stuff. Rhetoric and ineffective or non-existent policies. There are important technical and policy issues that are being worked on." LeCun publicly stated "I agree."

Ng Enda also issued an article publicly opposing the thousands of people who signed the petition, and said: "GPT-4 has many new applications in education, health care, food, etc., and will help many people. Unless the government intervenes, the suspension will be implemented And preventing all teams from scaling LLM is unrealistic. Furthermore, asking governments to suspend emerging technologies they don’t understand is anti-competitive, sets a bad precedent, and is bad policy.”

Tian Yuandong later also supported Ng Enda’s view, “stated that he would not sign a moratorium. And said that once this kind of thing starts, there is no way to stop or reverse this trend. This It is the inevitable necessity of evolution. We should look forward from a different perspective, better understand LLM, adapt to it and utilize its power, and feel the heat."

# #Yi Tay (formerly a senior researcher at Google Brain), who just announced his departure from Google Brain, said: "If people who discuss LLM randomly on the Internet are banned for 6 months, I will sign."

The above is the detailed content of GPT-4 was asked to be banned due to complaints: OpenAI does not meet any of the artificial intelligence standards issued by the FTC. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!