


There are many situations! San Francisco wants self-driving taxis to put the brakes on
Since GM’s Cruise and Google’s Waymo were approved to operate self-driving taxis on the streets of San Francisco, there have been multiple instances where the vehicles have blocked city traffic and even impeded the movement of firefighting vehicles, sparking dissatisfaction among local officials. .
The transportation department is complaining
According to an earlier report by NBC, San Francisco transportation officials want Waymo and Cruise to slow down their operations due to safety concerns. Application and promotion of self-driving taxis in urban transportation.
San Francisco Transportation Authority officials said in two letters to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) that the promotion was unreasonable. In their letter, they cited recent incidents in which self-driving vehicles blocked traffic and impeded the movement of firefighting vehicles.
Cruise and Waymo are currently the only two companies approved to provide self-driving services to passengers in San Francisco.
Cruise received a license to operate self-driving taxis between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. last June, while Waymo received a license to provide self-driving services a few months later.
Self-driving taxis from both companies have been operating on the streets of San Francisco for several months now, but the vehicles have had many adverse reactions (or lack thereof) to complex traffic conditions.
In July last year, multiple Cruise self-driving cars blocked road traffic for several hours after inexplicably stopping, and a similar incident occurred in September last year. Earlier this year in January, a Waymo self-driving car stopped at an intersection in San Francisco, causing a traffic jam.
The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration launched an investigation into the vehicles operated by Cruise in December over concerns that the vehicles were blocking traffic and causing rear-end collisions during emergency braking.
San Francisco Transportation Authority officials wrote in the letter: "We need limited deployment of autonomous vehicles, rather than unlimited authorization, which will provide public confidence in the promotion of autonomous driving and industry success in San Francisco and beyond. "Confidence provides the best approach."
The fire department also criticized
Other San Francisco officials also expressed concerns that self-driving cars did not evade emergency vehicles.
Last April, a self-driving car parked in a lane and blocked a San Francisco Fire Department fire truck heading to the scene of a fire. A few months later, a Cruise AV self-driving car ran over a fire hose in use at a fire scene. Earlier in January this year, another Cruise AV self-driving car repeated this scene at a fire scene.
The fire department said they broke the front window of the self-driving car before stopping it from running over a fire hose. Other incidents included Cruise calling 911 on three separate occasions, claiming the passenger was "unresponsive" and possibly unwell, but when medical emergency personnel arrived they discovered the passenger was simply asleep.
In response to these anomalies, Cruise spokesman Aaron Mclea said: "The safety record of Cruise's self-driving cars has been publicly reported, including driving millions of kilometers in extremely complex urban environments, and there has been no such incident. Any situation that results in life-threatening injury or death.”
operating companies strive for
While the San Francisco Transportation Authority supports the application of autonomous driving technology, it hopes to increase transparency and implement additional safeguards .
Transportation officials say operators of self-driving cars should be required to collect more data on vehicle performance, including how often and when self-driving cars block road traffic; they also want to limit self-driving cars during rush hours. Operate on the streets of downtown San Francisco until proven capable of operating without significant obstruction to road traffic.
Still, Cruise hopes to operate its self-driving taxi service around the clock in San Francisco. While the company received approval from the California Department of Motor Vehicles last December, it is still awaiting approval from the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC).
In addition, both self-driving car operators already provide ride-hailing services in Phoenix, Arizona, and Cruise will also operate its self-driving cars in Austin, Texas.
Waymo spokesperson Katherine Barna said in a statement to industry media: "These letters submitted by the San Francisco Transportation Authority are an integral part of the regulatory process we have been looking to engage with California municipal officials and government agencies. Communication and dialogue. We will respond in a submission to the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) next week."
The above is the detailed content of There are many situations! San Francisco wants self-driving taxis to put the brakes on. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

Video Face Swap
Swap faces in any video effortlessly with our completely free AI face swap tool!

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics



Written above & the author’s personal understanding Three-dimensional Gaussiansplatting (3DGS) is a transformative technology that has emerged in the fields of explicit radiation fields and computer graphics in recent years. This innovative method is characterized by the use of millions of 3D Gaussians, which is very different from the neural radiation field (NeRF) method, which mainly uses an implicit coordinate-based model to map spatial coordinates to pixel values. With its explicit scene representation and differentiable rendering algorithms, 3DGS not only guarantees real-time rendering capabilities, but also introduces an unprecedented level of control and scene editing. This positions 3DGS as a potential game-changer for next-generation 3D reconstruction and representation. To this end, we provide a systematic overview of the latest developments and concerns in the field of 3DGS for the first time.

Yesterday during the interview, I was asked whether I had done any long-tail related questions, so I thought I would give a brief summary. The long-tail problem of autonomous driving refers to edge cases in autonomous vehicles, that is, possible scenarios with a low probability of occurrence. The perceived long-tail problem is one of the main reasons currently limiting the operational design domain of single-vehicle intelligent autonomous vehicles. The underlying architecture and most technical issues of autonomous driving have been solved, and the remaining 5% of long-tail problems have gradually become the key to restricting the development of autonomous driving. These problems include a variety of fragmented scenarios, extreme situations, and unpredictable human behavior. The "long tail" of edge scenarios in autonomous driving refers to edge cases in autonomous vehicles (AVs). Edge cases are possible scenarios with a low probability of occurrence. these rare events

0.Written in front&& Personal understanding that autonomous driving systems rely on advanced perception, decision-making and control technologies, by using various sensors (such as cameras, lidar, radar, etc.) to perceive the surrounding environment, and using algorithms and models for real-time analysis and decision-making. This enables vehicles to recognize road signs, detect and track other vehicles, predict pedestrian behavior, etc., thereby safely operating and adapting to complex traffic environments. This technology is currently attracting widespread attention and is considered an important development area in the future of transportation. one. But what makes autonomous driving difficult is figuring out how to make the car understand what's going on around it. This requires that the three-dimensional object detection algorithm in the autonomous driving system can accurately perceive and describe objects in the surrounding environment, including their locations,

The first pilot and key article mainly introduces several commonly used coordinate systems in autonomous driving technology, and how to complete the correlation and conversion between them, and finally build a unified environment model. The focus here is to understand the conversion from vehicle to camera rigid body (external parameters), camera to image conversion (internal parameters), and image to pixel unit conversion. The conversion from 3D to 2D will have corresponding distortion, translation, etc. Key points: The vehicle coordinate system and the camera body coordinate system need to be rewritten: the plane coordinate system and the pixel coordinate system. Difficulty: image distortion must be considered. Both de-distortion and distortion addition are compensated on the image plane. 2. Introduction There are four vision systems in total. Coordinate system: pixel plane coordinate system (u, v), image coordinate system (x, y), camera coordinate system () and world coordinate system (). There is a relationship between each coordinate system,

Trajectory prediction plays an important role in autonomous driving. Autonomous driving trajectory prediction refers to predicting the future driving trajectory of the vehicle by analyzing various data during the vehicle's driving process. As the core module of autonomous driving, the quality of trajectory prediction is crucial to downstream planning control. The trajectory prediction task has a rich technology stack and requires familiarity with autonomous driving dynamic/static perception, high-precision maps, lane lines, neural network architecture (CNN&GNN&Transformer) skills, etc. It is very difficult to get started! Many fans hope to get started with trajectory prediction as soon as possible and avoid pitfalls. Today I will take stock of some common problems and introductory learning methods for trajectory prediction! Introductory related knowledge 1. Are the preview papers in order? A: Look at the survey first, p

Original title: SIMPL: ASimpleandEfficientMulti-agentMotionPredictionBaselineforAutonomousDriving Paper link: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.02519.pdf Code link: https://github.com/HKUST-Aerial-Robotics/SIMPL Author unit: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology DJI Paper idea: This paper proposes a simple and efficient motion prediction baseline (SIMPL) for autonomous vehicles. Compared with traditional agent-cent

In the past month, due to some well-known reasons, I have had very intensive exchanges with various teachers and classmates in the industry. An inevitable topic in the exchange is naturally end-to-end and the popular Tesla FSDV12. I would like to take this opportunity to sort out some of my thoughts and opinions at this moment for your reference and discussion. How to define an end-to-end autonomous driving system, and what problems should be expected to be solved end-to-end? According to the most traditional definition, an end-to-end system refers to a system that inputs raw information from sensors and directly outputs variables of concern to the task. For example, in image recognition, CNN can be called end-to-end compared to the traditional feature extractor + classifier method. In autonomous driving tasks, input data from various sensors (camera/LiDAR

Written in front & starting point The end-to-end paradigm uses a unified framework to achieve multi-tasking in autonomous driving systems. Despite the simplicity and clarity of this paradigm, the performance of end-to-end autonomous driving methods on subtasks still lags far behind single-task methods. At the same time, the dense bird's-eye view (BEV) features widely used in previous end-to-end methods make it difficult to scale to more modalities or tasks. A sparse search-centric end-to-end autonomous driving paradigm (SparseAD) is proposed here, in which sparse search fully represents the entire driving scenario, including space, time, and tasks, without any dense BEV representation. Specifically, a unified sparse architecture is designed for task awareness including detection, tracking, and online mapping. In addition, heavy
