Do I have to use ChatGPT to write my homework? Wharton Business School professor goes in the opposite direction: If you take my class, you must use AI

What is the opposite:

When other children are prohibited from using ChatGPT by their teachers, students at the world's number one business school must use it to do their homework.

The thing is this: There is a "rebellious" professor at Wharton School: Ethan Mollick.

It’s the beginning of the semester. This management professor wrote a long article explaining his requirements for the new semester. The title clearly states:

You must use AI in my class. .

He also "spoiled" that he had actually used AI tools in the classroom, and the results were great.

Netizens started a heated discussion about this. Most people think that this is a good idea in the face of the current situation. Some people mentioned:

Even the Washington Post and the Associated Press are using AI to write articles, and using technology is not considered cheating. As long as the tasks assigned to students are not too simple, there is no need to worry about them using AI to get through.

How to use ChatGPT to write homework

So, how to use ChatGPT to write homework, just copy and paste the questions?

——Of course it won’t be so easy. There is a lot of knowledge here that is worth learning about.

Previously, Molik asked students to use ChatGPT to write a paper about "electing team leaders". The full text was required to have 5 paragraphs. Each person must give the AI ​​prompts at least 5 times, and finally summarize their experience of using it.

At the beginning, everyone just threw the questions given by the teacher directly to the AI. As a result, the AI-generated works were very awkward, and they could only get a C- at most when submitting homework.

So the students had no choice but to continue to train the AI. We mainly came up with three methods:

The first one is the easiest to think of: add more prompt words and continuously refine the requirements.

Take this assignment as an example. The tips from the first version to the final version are as follows:

• Generate a 5-paragraph article about electing team leaders;
• Generate a 5-paragraph article about how teams choose leaders;
• Generate a 5-paragraph article about how teams choose leaders and how the team process works;
• Generate a 5-paragraph article about A 5-paragraph essay on how leaders are selected by teams, team processes, and leadership skills;
• Generate a 5-paragraph essay, 250 words, on how leaders are selected by teams, team processes, and leadership skills.

The second is to add more professional knowledge to the prompt, such as this:

• Generate a 5-paragraph article about choosing a leader;
• Generate a 5-paragraph essay on selecting leaders, including the nonsense hypothesis, leader status effects, and qualifications;
• Generate a 5-paragraph essay on selecting leaders, Covers the babbling hypothesis, leader status effects, and seniority. Explain the nonsense effect: whoever talks the most can become a leader;
• ·······(The following is too long, so I won’t post it)

Finally One is equivalent to a human being acting as a reviewer, generating content based on AI, pointing out errors, and guiding them to modify and optimize step by step, for example:

• Generate a 5-paragraph article about selecting leaders ;
• This is good, but the third paragraph is wrong. The gibberish effect means that whoever talks the most becomes the leader. Correct this and add more details on how to use it. Add an example to paragraph 2;
• The example in paragraph 2 is incorrect. Presidential elections are held every four years. Pay attention to making the language in the last paragraph more interesting, and do not use the phrase "all in all";
• Based on the content of the 4 paragraphs, find 3 relevant examples, requiring them to be story-telling and the narrative language to be vivid. Don’t use examples of only masculine traits;
• add this paragraph back to the story and replace the second paragraph with one about your personal leadership style. Revise the last paragraph so it ends on a hopeful note.

Obviously, from the first to the third type, the degree of brain use of the operator increases in sequence.

The effect can be said to be "no pain, no gain".

The final output result of the first method is mediocre, and the content is general and nihilistic; the effect of the second method is obviously much better, but it is not convenient to fine-tune the content of the article. Students who use this method said that they feel that they are right There isn't much control over the AI's output.

The last "co-editing method" works best, but it not only requires people to have certain professional knowledge, but also needs to carefully check the output content of the AI ​​to make good suggestions.

"Learning to use AI is a new skill"

Although ChatGPT shocked everyone with its technology soon after it came out, everyone gradually discovered that this AI sometimes "talks nonsense seriously."

However, in Molik’s view, it’s not that ChatGPT cannot write good articles, but it needs to be properly trained.

He believes that since AI tools are now overwhelming, even if teachers do not allow students to use ChatGPT to write homework, students may still use it secretly.

Then... let you use it enough, and then you will naturally understand the pros and cons:

Learning to use AI is a new skill... but AI tools like ChatGPT have limitations Sex, this is what everyone must understand.

So-called limitations, for example:

The quality of ChatGPT’s content generation is closely related to the prompts given by humans. The more perfunctory your input is, the more perfunctory the AI ​​will be.

In addition, sometimes its answers may seem reasonable at first glance, but in fact they contain errors and biased content that must be corrected manually.

In short, in the words of Professor Molik, it is even more challenging for students to write an article through ChatGPT than if they write it purely on their own - because Students may also have to check assignments written by AI like a teacher, which can help improve their logical thinking.

In addition to Molik, experts in the field of AI also pointed out:

In fact, AI such as ChatGPT is not used to tell you new things.

Their real usefulness lies in assisting people with a certain professional foundation to help them improve their learning or work efficiency.

Reference link:
[1]https://oneusefulthing.substack.com/p/my-class-required-ai-heres-what-ive
[2]https:// news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34868437
[3]https://www.wsj.com/articles/from-ceos-to-coders-employees-experiment-with-new-ai-programs-32e1768a ?mod=djemalertNEWS​

The above is the detailed content of Do I have to use ChatGPT to write my homework? Wharton Business School professor goes in the opposite direction: If you take my class, you must use AI. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!