Unless you just woke up from a coma, I don’t need words to describe what the iPhone 13 Pro Max looks like, right? It's a big, blocky flagship, with glass front and back and flat stainless steel sides - the back half giving the phone a heavy, brick-like feel. In my opinion, Apple's flat, boxy design looks good and gives the phone an authoritative, machine-like vibe that contrasts with most Android flagships, most of which are wrapped in soft curves. The Vivo X80 Pro definitely fits that vibe, with its glass back coated in a soft matte coating that feels smooth to the touch.
It’s a widespread belief that the iPhone 13 Pro Max is too big to hold comfortably
I personally don’t like the feel of either phone: I don’t like the Vivo’s smooth matte back, and the iPhone 13 Pro Max’s flat sides result in angular corners that dig into my palm. Of course, these are just my opinions, but I do think it's a widely shared opinion that the iPhone 13 Pro Max is too big to hold comfortably. Aamir did find the Vivo X80 Pro to be a good fit for his taste, while sharing the same concerns about the iPhone's blocky design.
In terms of optics, the iPhone 13 Pro Max comes with a simple triple 12MP lens setup covering ultra-wide, wide-angle and telephoto focal length. Aside from Apple's Deep Fusion image-processing algorithm and a night mode that turns on automatically, there aren't many tricks or gimmicks to this iPhone camera -- there's no pixel binning, and no special side-facing lenses. The Vivo X80 Pro does more, with a quad-lens system that includes dual zoom lenses for two optical zoom lengths, with one lens supported by a micro-gimbal system. There's also a Zeiss T coating on each glass so they reduce lens flare, and both the main and ultra-wide cameras use pixel binning technology to force larger micron pixel sizes. There's a lot more processing that goes on between when Vivo's camera hardware captures the photo and when it appears in the Photos library. Helping out is Vivo's proprietary V1, a dedicated imaging chip designed to handle image processing. Apple also has its own image processing hardware, which is just part of the A15 Bionic.
Let’s start by checking the photo consistency across all shots. In the image below, shot in relatively ideal lighting conditions, we can see that the iPhone does a better job of maintaining a consistent color temperature between the main and ultra-wide lenses, while the Vivo shows some deviation in the shadows of the sky. Both main cameras take excellent photos, with sharp photos, good contrast, and accurate colors. Even if I zoom in 100% to pixel peep, it's a virtual tie. This is not the case with other shots.
However, the iPhone 13 Pro’s 3x zoom is really great—perhaps the best telephoto zoom lens in the industry. In the crop below, I took an iPhone 3x zoom photo, punching the hole to bring the frame closer to Vivo's 5x periscope zoom lens, and we can see that the image sharpness is about the same in both photos, while the X80 Pro's Photos are slightly less noisy. But if we did increase the zoom level to 15x, the X80 Pro's shots would be a bit sharper, because at the end of the day, having periscope technology is better than not having it at all.
Crops from the 3x iPhone 13 Pro Max lens (left) and the 5x X80 Pro lens (right).
However, the scene above is considered easy to shoot with a modern smartphone, if we move to more challenging scenes such as low light conditions or strong backlighting, then we start to see Vivo's superior hardware leads to some clear wins. In the image below, we can see that it's now the iPhone that exhibits color science deviations between the main and ultra-wide cameras, as the ultra-wide angle of the iPhone 13 Pro Max doesn't naturally take in a lot of light, and it takes two seconds to use Use the clock's long night mode to shoot. Vivo's ultra-wide angle has a larger image sensor and uses pixel binning technology, so it can take photos like the ones below normally during the day.
Generally speaking, the vivo X80 Pro’s lens is brighter, if we check in, more details
Still, the Vivo X80 Pro introduces a new "Cinematic Portrait" video mode that's arguably as good as the iPhone 13 Pro Max's own Movie Mode.
Overall, I would say that the camera system ceiling of vivo X80 Pro is higher, but also lower, which means that when vivo does a good job, it is very, very good, but there are some basic things , like the ability to switch lenses while shooting for video, which Vivo hasn't done right yet. The iPhone 13 Pro Max is a more powerful camera and has a better telephoto zoom lens. But the differences are minimal, and both are very good cameras that won't disappoint the end user.
This is yet another iOS vs. Android showdown, and I think most readers already have an opinion. But here's my opinion: I've always preferred Android over iOS because the former is more customizable and allows me to do more (like load apps easily, or save files in a proper file system), But I know iOS is more complete and surrounded by a better hardware ecosystem and third-party app ecosystem.
iOS 15 on iPhone 13 Pro Max and FunTouch 12 on Vivo X80 Pro.
These feelings definitely ring true for me when testing both phones side by side. Vivo's FunTouch OS is highly customizable, allowing me to change everything from the way the home screen moves to the fingerprint animation. I also love being able to open apps in a floating window which I often do. The latter part is one of the main reasons I carry an Android phone with me as my daily driver most of the time - I want to be able to multitask on the phone. With such a big screen on the iPhone 13 Pro Max, it's frustrating not being able to display multiple apps at once.
This means that even if my primary SIM card is I spend most of the year in an Android phone, but because of the superiority of the app, I always have an iPhone nearby. This is unlikely to change in the short term.
There’s good evidence that the Apple A15 Bionic chip in the iPhone 13 Pro Max is better than the Qualcomm Snapdragon in the Vivo X80 Pro The 8 Gen 1 is more powerful, and again the benchmark numbers back this up. But the thing is, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is still a very powerful chip, so for most of my day-to-day use, I didn't really see a difference in performance, unlike what I saw with the iPhone 13 Pro Max. Apps are faster or able to process voice commands faster.
Others General performance aspects also favor the iPhone: Apple's device has a louder, more complete speaker setup, a better tactile feel, and longer battery life. In fact, the iPhone 13 Pro Max has probably the longest battery life of any phone I've tested in the past few years—I could get through a full 12, 13-hour workday with more than 30 percent juice. In the era of 120Hz screens, no Android flagship phone can do this. Still, the Vivo X80 Pro usually lasted a 12-13 hour day (just with less battery left at the end), so it wasn't a big deal for me. It doesn't matter if I get home with 32% or 17% battery left. Plus, the Vivo X80 Pro charges faster and comes with a charger, so these are real wins.
There's also the value factor, which is arguably a win for Vivo: The iPhone 13 Pro Max and Vivo X80 Pro both cost around $1,100 in most parts of the world, But Vivo's phone comes with a screen protector, a nice faux leather case, wired earbuds, and a fast charger. In regions like India, where the price difference between the iPhone 13 Pro Max and the Vivo X80 Pro is over $640 (around $750 if you compare the 256GB version), the Vivo X80 Pro wins on pure value.
The above is the detailed content of Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max vs Vivo X80 Pro: May the best camera win!. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!