Samsung updates its flagship smartphone lineup every year, and every year there's a controversial question: Which is better, Snapdragon or Exynos? Exynos is the company's in-house chipset that powers some of its phones every year, although Europe is almost always the one region guaranteed to get Exynos chips. The US tends to get Snapdragon chips, and then in all other regions it's a toss-up as to what chipset they'll get. This year, India got its first Snapdragon chip in the Samsung Galaxy S22 series, and like clockwork, Europe got its Exynos.
As we noted, there appear to be some major issues with retail units of the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. Display flickering issues and performance issues have been fixed. Since publishing our article, I've had a number of consumers contact me on Twitter saying they're experiencing similar performance issues on their Exynos-based S22 devices. I've even seen some users say things have gotten worse since the last update. Keep in mind that Samsung is aware of the performance issues currently facing Exynos devices, at least according to noted leaker Max Jambor.
To be fair, I've also had a lot of consumers tell me that there are no issues with their devices. The purpose of this article is not to say that every user will have this experience, but there are quite a few consumers complaining about the performance of their devices. I have now managed to get my hands on a Galaxy S22 Ultra device powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, provided by Samsung PR USA, and tested it against a retail Exynos-based device purchased directly from Samsung Ireland. The results may be what you expect. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra: Snapdragon vs. Exynos
Instead, developer options were used to prevent any background processes from running on the device, and "Do not preserve activities" was enabled on both devices. Where possible, these devices were also disconnected from the Internet so that they could not receive push notifications that could interfere with testing. Essentially, I make sure there are no background processes running, and I also make sure there are no network interferences.
Both devices have also been updated to the latest available software versions, with build numbers and build dates below.
Exynos
Sustained performance is one of the most important metrics to pay attention to when using a smartphone. If sustained performance is poor, then after a short period of time your performance will degrade significantly. I did a comparison test between the two devices, and while performance was consistent between the two, the Snapdragon chipset always came out ahead. Still, this shows more reasonable results for the Exynos and doesn't itself indicate a problem.
To be clear, some of this is caused by other factors on the phone, such as the screen. However, there are significant differences in energy use.
In my testing, I also found high idle consumption, which means users will experience lower standby time on Exynos devices than on Snapdragon. App Launch TestWe designed a real-world test of app launch speed that launches some of the popular apps we use every day for 10 consecutive iterations. These applications are launched "cold" on the device, meaning the application is not cached in memory before being launched. When the app's main activity first starts drawing, the timing stops, so there's no need to wait for content to load from the network. Therefore, this test can determine how quickly a device can load applications from storage to memory, but it is important to note that this test is sensitive to changes in application and operating system versions. Given that we're comparing two variants of the same phone, it's easier to draw direct conclusions.
Above, I have included a video to show some of the issues I noticed that are not present on the Snapdragon variant Exynos variant. As evidence of the real-world consequences of some of these issues, I was logged into all the same apps on both devices. I use both devices differently than usual, all the same apps I'm logged into on the Exynos device are the same apps I'm logged into on the OPPO Find N, OnePlus 9 Pro, and Google Pixel 6 Pro, just to name a few example.
The Exynos 2200 experience is almost identical to that of using a budget device, everything takes a second longer than expected with a top flagship product
In other aspects of these devices, I didn't really notice any differences. The cameras are very close - if not quite - to each other (although I think the Qualcomm has a slight edge from my own use), and the stability seems to be about the same for anything less extreme. Walking around Barcelona and shooting equally well on both devices, I didn't notice any issues in this regard.As I already mentioned Well, I've had several users contact me about their poor experiences with the Exynos 2200 variant of the device. Not a single user with a Snapdragon chipset has contacted me complaining about the same issue. I'm not sure if every Exynos user encounters these issues, but there are certainly a significant number. I even tried enabling high performance mode in my battery settings but it made no difference. I also didn't see any signs of memory management issues as there was always RAM available.
It pains me to say it when it comes to Android smartphones, but Exynos is important. Qualcomm has a virtual monopoly on the Android flagship market... although there's no denying that MediaTek is catching up quickly. Having Samsung, the largest Android OEM in the space, use its own chipsets for a large portion of its portfolio puts some pressure on Qualcomm, which in an ideal world would be the same number of users who want Exynos chipsets as they are hungry for Qualcomm chips. Group.
It's hard to say what the cause of these problems is. It's likely to be the Exynos 2200, as other Exynos in the past haven't quite been on par with Snapdragon either. Or it could be that Samsung has coincidentally messed up the software on the Exynos variants. Samsung doesn't appear to have made any public statements about Exynos variants, as ComputerBase even said that while the company was contacted, it declined to say whether an update would be released.
In the past, as with the Exynos Galaxy S21 Ultra, gaming performance has been poor throughout the product's lifespan, as the Exynos 2100 just couldn't run properly, and no amount of software updates could bring it on par with its Snapdragon counterparts. As a result, the Galaxy S21 Ultra falls short of an across-the-board recommendation for its stellar performance, as your ability to play games on the device largely depends on where you buy it from. This is quite unacceptable considering the launch price of the phone remains at Rs 1,06,000/€1,249.
As it stands, the Exynos 2200 Galaxy S22 Ultra is completely useless as a daily driver
For now, the only thing I can say is if you live in Europe, don't buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. As it stands, the Exynos 2200 Galaxy S22 Ultra is completely useless as a daily driver. It's incredibly laggy and the battery life is terrible. It didn't improve anything and I had to turn off my phone multiple times during the day. I find it difficult to recommend a product that costs so much but performs so poorly, and I would be doing a disservice as a reviewer if I didn't highlight these issues I face at retail. As long as other OEMs are offering top-tier flagships that consistently perform like the top-tier flagships in your region, there's little reason to buy the Exynos Galaxy S22 series and take the draw on whether you're going to get a device that performs like the top-tier flagships. Some Exynos users get a good device, some don't - and that's unacceptable.
The above is the detailed content of Snapdragon Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Exynos. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!
![[Web front-end] Node.js quick start](https://img.php.cn/upload/course/000/000/067/662b5d34ba7c0227.png)
