How git merge requests restrict meta branches
In Git, merge request (Merge Request) is an extremely important function in collaborative development. Through merge requests, team members can easily merge their code contributions into the main branch of the project to ensure code consistency and stability. However, sometimes we need to limit the selection of source branches (also called meta branches) for merge requests to ensure the quality and safety of the code. This article will explain how to limit meta branches for Git merge requests.
- Branch Protection
In code hosting platforms such as GitLab, we can use the "Branch Protection" function to limit the meta branches of Git merge requests. Branch protection is a setting that limits and protects branches. Through this function, we can prohibit operations such as Push and Merge Request on specified branches.
First, go into the project settings in GitLab and select the "Branch" tab. Here we can see a list of branches for all projects. Next, select the branch you want to restrict (usually the trunk branch) and click the "Protect Branch" button.
In the protected branch settings page, we can choose the operations to be prohibited according to our needs, such as prohibiting branch push, merge request, fusion request, deletion, etc. Most importantly, we can also limit the selection of meta branches. In the "The following branches cannot be selected as the source branch of the merge request" option, select the branch that needs to be restricted.
- Code Review
In addition to branch protection, another way to limit Git merge requests to meta branches is through code review. Code review is a method of manually reviewing code to ensure code quality and security. During the code review process, reviewers can check the style, correctness, security, etc. of the code and discover and fix potential problems and vulnerabilities.
In Git, we can limit the meta branches of Git merge requests by setting reviewers and review rules. For example, we can require that each merge request must be approved by at least two reviewers, and must meet conditions such as code style specifications and unit test passing before it can be merged. In this way, the quality and security of the code can be ensured even without limiting the choice of meta branches.
- Restrict merge permissions
In addition to the above two methods, you can also restrict the meta branch of Git merge requests by restricting merge permissions. In Git, we can set the permissions of each branch, for example, only allow some people to perform merge operations under certain conditions.
First, enter the branch settings page in Git, then select the branch that needs to be restricted, and set the permissions in the "Permissions" option. For example, we can set that only project administrators can merge merge requests for that branch, or only developers who meet certain conditions can perform merge operations.
Summary:
For meta branch restrictions on Git merge requests, we can use a variety of methods, such as branch protection, code review, limiting merge permissions, etc. These methods have their own advantages, disadvantages and applicable scenarios. We need to choose the appropriate method according to the specific situation to ensure the quality and security of the code.
The above is the detailed content of How git merge requests restrict meta branches. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!

Hot AI Tools

Undresser.AI Undress
AI-powered app for creating realistic nude photos

AI Clothes Remover
Online AI tool for removing clothes from photos.

Undress AI Tool
Undress images for free

Clothoff.io
AI clothes remover

AI Hentai Generator
Generate AI Hentai for free.

Hot Article

Hot Tools

Notepad++7.3.1
Easy-to-use and free code editor

SublimeText3 Chinese version
Chinese version, very easy to use

Zend Studio 13.0.1
Powerful PHP integrated development environment

Dreamweaver CS6
Visual web development tools

SublimeText3 Mac version
God-level code editing software (SublimeText3)

Hot Topics



GitHub is not difficult to learn. 1) Master the basic knowledge: GitHub is a Git-based version control system that helps track code changes and collaborative development. 2) Understand core functions: Version control records each submission, supporting local work and remote synchronization. 3) Learn how to use: from creating a repository to push commits, to using branches and pull requests. 4) Solve common problems: such as merge conflicts and forgetting to add files. 5) Optimization practice: Use meaningful submission messages, clean up branches, and manage tasks using the project board. Through practice and community communication, GitHub’s learning curve is not steep.

On your resume, you should choose to write Git or GitHub based on your position requirements and personal experience. 1. If the position requires Git skills, highlight Git. 2. If the position values community participation, show GitHub. 3. Make sure to describe the usage experience and project cases in detail and end with a complete sentence.

GitLab is better for some developers and teams because it provides a complete DevOps toolchain and powerful CI/CD capabilities. 1. GitLab's CI/CD function is integrated within the platform, supporting full process automation from code submission to deployment. 2. Its server-side rendering technology improves page loading speed for large projects. 3. GitLab's permission management system is more flexible and supports fine-grained control.

Microsoft does not own Git, but owns GitHub. 1.Git is a distributed version control system created by Linus Torvaz in 2005. 2. GitHub is an online code hosting platform based on Git. It was founded in 2008 and acquired by Microsoft in 2018.

Starting from Git is more suitable for a deep understanding of version control principles, and starting from GitHub is more suitable for focusing on collaboration and code hosting. 1.Git is a distributed version control system that helps manage code version history. 2. GitHub is an online platform based on Git, providing code hosting and collaboration capabilities.

The reason for using GitHub to manage HTML projects is that it provides a platform for version control, collaborative development and presentation of works. The specific steps include: 1. Create and initialize the Git repository, 2. Add and submit HTML files, 3. Push to GitHub, 4. Use GitHubPages to deploy web pages, 5. Use GitHubActions to automate building and deployment. In addition, GitHub also supports code review, Issue and PullRequest features to help optimize and collaborate on HTML projects.

Git and GitHub are not the same thing. Git is a version control system, and GitHub is a Git-based code hosting platform. Git is used to manage code versions, and GitHub provides an online collaboration environment.

Git is an open source distributed version control system that helps developers track file changes, work together and manage code versions. Its core functions include: 1) record code modifications, 2) fallback to previous versions, 3) collaborative development, and 4) create and manage branches for parallel development.
