ChatGPT is increasingly popular among content creators because of its ability to generate large amounts of content in a short period of time. However, like any powerful technology, AI language models can be misused.
Before downplaying this issue, it is important to recognize that misuse of AI can bring risks of legal issues, reputational damage and erroneous output. The following explores how to avoid content creators using ChatGPT the wrong way.
If users use ChatGPT for the first time, they will immediately notice its fast response speed. What once took hours to create now takes seconds. Over time, users may come to rely heavily on the software, often making only a few modifications without bothering to delve deeper into it.
This phenomenon refers to people’s over-reliance on artificial intelligence, and creators are forced to produce content quickly, and this becomes their attraction. However, a literature review on over-reliance on AI published by Microsoft warns that over-reliance on AI can lead to users accepting erroneous results.
Take the controversy of the online media CNET as an example. CNET published a financial analysis article written by artificial intelligence, signed "CNET Money Staff". Unfortunately, some experts have discovered glaring errors in AI-generated articles. This sentence can be rewritten as: It accused the media organization of publishing disturbing financial advice and manipulating Google search results for profit by churning out low-quality content.
CNET is over-relying on artificial intelligence, over-confidence, or no one will notice. Regardless, this incident should serve as a warning against over-reliance on the output of artificial intelligence.
One thing to keep in mind is that ChatGPT may output a large amount of outdated information. As the ChatGPT company itself said, the deadline for the knowledge used to train ChatGPT is September 2021, so it is a good measure for users to double-check the authenticity of the information.
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman also mentioned in a video interview with ABC News that users should be more cautious about ChatGPT’s “illusion problem.” It can confidently state fictional ideas as if they were fact. Incidents like this one from CNET Network can damage its users' credibility as an authoritative source of news.
When users lack sufficient knowledge to evaluate the results, it is easier for them to blindly accept content generated by ChatGPT. If ChatGPT's answers match users' perceptions, they may not make a special effort to explore different perspectives. To avoid these embarrassing situations, corroborate the facts, explore different perspectives, and seek expert advice.
Users are learning to use ChatGPT for content creation, including what AI illusion is and how to spot it in a list of topics to master. More importantly, don’t ignore human judgment and creativity. What needs to be remembered is that AI should enhance thinking, not replace it.
If users ask ChatGPT to provide Internet links to research resources, they may be disappointed. While ChatGPT may provide links, those links may be incorrect or may not necessarily be to the best content on the web.
To test it, the researchers asked ChatGPT to provide links to JSTOR research papers on coming-of-age stories written by young British fantasy writers. ChatGPT provides 5 resources, including title, volume number, page number and author.
At first glance, this list seems credible. Articles on JSTOR have some impressive-sounding titles, such as "Constructing Hybrid Identities: Race and Ethnicity in the Sally Greene Trilogy." But a Google search quickly shows that most links lead to the wrong JSTOR article, with one link leading to a 404 page.
Give ChatGPT a more specific topic and see if you get better results. Here's the prompt to use: "I'm writing a literary research paper on 'Heroines in British Young Adult and Adult Contemporary Fiction', can you give me a literature review on this topic?"
ChatGPT presents a list of five works, with author names and abstracts noted. However, one cannot find any of its listed works online.
To better understand this information, researchers are requesting links. ChatGPT refused this time, explaining that it was just an artificial intelligence language model without web browsing capabilities. However, it provides bibliographic information, and although the works are said to have been created between 2004 and 2018, this cannot be verified online.
ChatGPT steadfastly refuses to provide a link to verify the information it provides. OpenAI says it does not have web browsing capabilities but instead provides a list of bibliographic information. However, its data is still wrong.
The latest ChatGPT release notes from OpenAI Corporation reveal that it now has web browsing capabilities. But these features have not yet reached every user. Furthermore, as the researchers point out, ChatGPT’s search results are not necessarily the best on the internet, as professionals can manipulate the search engine’s results.
To avoid this problem:
The functions of ChatGPT may induce users to personify it or give it human attributes. For example, you can ask ChatGPT for suggestions, and if you need someone to chat with, you can chat with it.
ChatGP seems to be an emotional listener that can serve as your best friend and provide you with advice when you are feeling burnt out in the workplace.
But no matter how compassionate it sounds, ChatGPT is not human. Sentences that sound like human generation are simply the result of ChatGPT predicting the next word, or "tag," in the sequence based on its training data. It is not sentient like humans and has its own will and thoughts.
In other words, ChatGPT does not replace interpersonal relationships and collaboration in the workplace. As the Work and Happiness Initiative at Harvard University notes, these relationships benefit people and help improve their well-being and protect them from workplace stress.
Learning to use the latest technology tools is important, but interaction with other members of your team is also essential. Instead of relying on ChatGPT, replicate social relationships, build interpersonal skills, interact with colleagues, and find ways to make more progress together. Someone who does their job well.
Have you encountered the problem of difficulty in getting the best response when using ChatGPT? If you can provide specific situations and clear guidance, this question will be resolved may be resolved.
In the following example, ChatGPT can be asked to summarize an interesting blog written by American country music singer Eric Allen on Hackernoon. The lengthy article describes Allen's process of improving AI prompts in ChatGPT to create a music recommendation system called BeatBrain.
However, ChatGPT is not familiar with Allen’s article. When asked to share the link and provide a summary, ChatGPT falsely claimed that Eric Allen founded BeatBrain, a company that uses GPT-3 technology to create AI-generated music.
In order to assist ChatGPT in organizing articles, the articles need to be split into several parts and then copied and pasted. A corresponding summary must be provided for each upload. ChatGPT gets the job done right this time. The researchers used ChatGPT with another directive to redirect comments instead of summaries.
This experiment aims to demonstrate how to use ChatGPT to effectively summarize long technical articles. However, people can now access many Internet resources and learn prompting techniques to improve their ChatGPT responses.
Using recommended tips is not a foolproof way to prevent ChatGPT hallucinations, but it can help providers provide accurate results. Also check out the best ChatGPT tips on GitHub for more information on tip techniques. More information.
Using ChatGPT requires caution and responsibility, although it brings unprecedented speed and convenience. Avoid over-reliance on ChatGPT by using more appropriate tools for your research, working better with your team, and learning to use prompts effectively to maximize its benefits.
Embrace the power of ChatGPT, but always be aware of its limitations. By maximizing the potential of ChatGPT while minimizing its flaws, impactful, creative content can be produced, thereby improving the quality of the work.
The above is the detailed content of Four mistakes you should avoid when creating content with ChatGPT. For more information, please follow other related articles on the PHP Chinese website!
![[Web front-end] Node.js quick start](https://img.php.cn/upload/course/000/000/067/662b5d34ba7c0227.png)
